View Poll Results: Which WR most closely develops, into our #1 WR in GREEN BAY

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • WATSON

    2 13.33%
  • WICKS

    7 46.67%
  • REED

    6 40.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: WHO DEVELOPS INTO the NUMBER ONE WIDE RECEIVER in GB ?

  1. #21
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    1400-1500 is too high a bar. Only 5 guys in the entire NFL had 1400+. I think 1200 would be more like it.
    1200 and 10 touchdowns is definitely a #1
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  2. #22
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,208
    Davante is a borderline HOFer and he’s only gone over 1200 and 10 4 times in 10 years.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  3. #23
    Does this sound right?

    Reed is most likely to get lots of touches and make plays after the catch.

    Wicks is more likey to be they guy to fight for the 50-50 ball.

    Watson is more likely to beat everyone deep and go up and get a short TD pass jump ball.

    Pick which one is your #1, but you want them all on the field.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by MadtownPacker View Post
    This a ridiculous poll. It’s obvious it’s going to be a rookie WR from next year. The one the Rodgers pick is used on.
    Hahahahahahaha.

  5. #25
    because we are so deep at WR, do we trade one or 2 away, and when? (probably not this offseason)

  6. #26
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,208
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    because we are so deep at WR, do we trade one or 2 away, and when? (probably not this offseason)
    Probably, if they all go the way they’re going. 2nd round pick is better than a 3rd compensatory.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  7. #27
    Could be a 1A, 1B between Reed and Wicks. I lean more toward Wicks, because he's been better against man coverage, but they've both been good and things like that can change a lot year-to-year.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •