If you pay 50 million in the first year and cut them, but you already took the full 50M hit… yes, you’re not paying for it anymore. But if you already paid the 50million for one year and took the hit, are you really gaining anything? No. It’s a ridiculous argument.
Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
It's facts not an argument.Originally Posted by RashanGary
You don’t want a hit in your cap.
When you make a guaranteed portion of a contract, you’re guaranteed to do something you don’t want to do.
Whether you do it now or later it’s still the exact same thing. You took a hit on your cap. And it was guaranteed.
If you substitute taking a cap hit (something you don’t want) with cutting your arm off (also something you don’t want)
I think we can clearly see that if we cut our arm off now or later, it’s still the same result.
Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote