hahahahaha Maybe Eberflus deserves to get canned. Is Fields really "subpar"? If "-par" means being the best or say top 2 or 3 QBs in the league, yeah, I guess he is "subpar". On the other hand, if "subpar" means less than as somebody mentioned, top 1/3, hell no. There certainly aren't 10 or 11 better QBs than Fields, at least not IMO.
And Caleb Williams is a bust on the way to happening - also IMO. That would be even more likely with the Bears. Drafting him with one of those high first round picks would be a very Bear-like move.
Justin Fields was:
22nd in passing yards
20th in TD passes
23rd in INT%
22nd in passer rating
24th in QBR
29th in completion pct.
21st in yards per attempt
At least he was pretty consistent.
Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget your perfect offering
There is a crack, a crack in everything
That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen
22nd in passing yards
20th in TD passes
23rd in INT%
22nd in passer rating
24th in QBR
29th in completion pct.
21st in yards per attempt
At least he was pretty consistent.
LOL so you're saying he's closer to Sam Howell and Gardner Minshew in terms of being a QB than Lamar Jackson? SHOCKING. I'm sure Tex will come up with some objective proof that Fields is a top 12 QB. (Like fumbles)
22nd in passing yards
20th in TD passes
23rd in INT%
22nd in passer rating
24th in QBR
29th in completion pct.
21st in yards per attempt
Pfft. People can twist statistics around to mean aything they want. Ask any Bears fan, and he'll explain that every single one of those numbers is just an outlier, an abberation.
Pfft. People can twist statistics around to mean aything they want. Ask any Bears fan, and he'll explain that every single one of those numbers is just an outlier, an abberation.
I bet Fields could throw a football over that mountain.