Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: Grading the Packer's Draft

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,241
    This was the year after the Covid season. It was, like this year, a historically thin draft. If the grade is a C based on normal expectations, he probably performed at about B level compared to the rest of the league that year.

    Likewise, this years draft probably won’t be so great in the mid to later rounds either.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by RashanGary View Post
    This was the year after the Covid season. It was, like this year, a historically thin draft. If the grade is a C based on normal expectations, he probably performed at about B level compared to the rest of the league that year.

    Likewise, this years draft probably won’t be so great in the mid to later rounds either.
    COVID definitely impacted the draft.
    Getting an extra year meant you have more older prospects coming out.

    NIL is the other piece to the puzzle. Combined with getting an extra year of eligibility from COVID, players have less incentive to declare early. In 2021 it might have resulted in a thinner draft, but I don't think 2024 was a thinner draft because of it. I actually think NIL makes for more robust drafts -- you have better developed players or players with more demonstrated production at the college level for scouts.

    The talent at specific positions also varies by year (this year's QB class = very good, this year's ILB class = not so good)... so RG you're not wrong but I just think there are a lot of factors in play you didn't mention.

  3. #3
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,241
    Quote Originally Posted by run pMc View Post
    COVID definitely impacted the draft.
    Getting an extra year meant you have more older prospects coming out.

    NIL is the other piece to the puzzle. Combined with getting an extra year of eligibility from COVID, players have less incentive to declare early. In 2021 it might have resulted in a thinner draft, but I don't think 2024 was a thinner draft because of it. I actually think NIL makes for more robust drafts -- you have better developed players or players with more demonstrated production at the college level for scouts.

    The talent at specific positions also varies by year (this year's QB class = very good, this year's ILB class = not so good)... so RG you're not wrong but I just think there are a lot of factors in play you didn't mention.

    There were only 50 juniors that came out. Usually it’s 100. Juniors are staying back because of the NIL and portal. They make money at school now.

    Next year there will be more seniors so next years draft will go back to being deeper.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by RashanGary View Post
    There were only 50 juniors that came out. Usually it’s 100. Juniors are staying back because of the NIL and portal. They make money at school now.

    Next year there will be more seniors so next years draft will go back to being deeper.
    Until the next lawsuit came me to challenge the NCAA's ability to limit eligibility based years played.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by RashanGary View Post
    There were only 50 juniors that came out. Usually it’s 100. Juniors are staying back because of the NIL and portal. They make money at school now.

    Next year there will be more seniors so next years draft will go back to being deeper.
    Cam Rising (Utah QB) will be 25 in two weeks, and he's back for another year. I think it's something crazy like 7 total because of COVID, injuries and NIL money. I think he's now the George Blanda of college football.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •