This one is for Patler.

http://overthecap.com/russell-wilson...-negotiations/

It grabbed my attention by pointing out that Peter King's assessment of Aaron Rodgers contract as a percent of the salary cap was flawed.

King mentions that at $22 million per year, that means that Rodgers’ year on cap hit was 17.8% in year one
It seems King was guilty of using a rounded number for the average salary, but also overestimating the overall value and structure of the contract. The author points to his work that shows that Rodgers never exceeds 13.27% of the Packer's salary cap in a given year.

So later in his piece (http://mmqb.si.com/2015/06/08/russel...-contract-nfl/) when King starts to estimate what Wilson's ask will be, he is starting with a very inflated QB percentage of future team salary caps (caps that are again regularly increasing).

Suppose Wilson signed a deal averaging $22 million per. This year the cap is $143.3 million. Rodgers’ deal, in year one, was for 17.8 percent of the Packers’ cap. Wilson’s $22 million average deal, if that’s anything near what he wants, would be for 15.4 percent of the Seahawks’ 2015 cap.
The large error here is the use of average salary. King calculates it (confusing, using OTC numbers) at slightly under $22 million. However, when they break it down by year, Rodgers never exceeds $22 million in cap hit in any year, and has several well below it.