Very true, but the data supports that if you want to get to it and lose to Brady your best chance is to have a highly paid, top notch QB.Originally Posted by bobblehead
Very true, but the data supports that if you want to get to it and lose to Brady your best chance is to have a highly paid, top notch QB.
HOFer
Nothing in your stats shows this. You can’t count QBs on cheap contracts that got paid right after they went to a Super Bowl as guys with big contracts. Makes no sense.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
I didn’t do that. When Russ won the super bowl before getting extended for example that counts as a cheap QB. 90% of super bowl appearances featured a QB not on cheap contracts.
67% of super bowls had a qb appear on not cheap contracts in the last 15 years. Not 90%.
So a full 33% had 0 expensive representation and 67% were won by a qb that was relatively cheap.
All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.
George Orwell
Not sure where you getting those numbers from but I will double check. Sounds unlikely based on common sense.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote