Originally Posted by Bretsky
yep... its game over now about Favre stuff...
Originally Posted by Bretsky
yep... its game over now about Favre stuff...
I looked back, and you took a personal shot at Danno. Unprovoked I might add. Packer fans can hate Favre, becuase they are fans of the TEAM, and did not care for the Divas childish unprofessional behavior. I could say that you are not a Packer Fan becuase you put a PLAYER over the TEAM.Originally Posted by Pacopete4
Originally Posted by cpk1994
I think that player would make this TEAM better.... there is nothing wrong with that... its only the situation that it falls under that u see it differently
Doesn't matter. A real fan NEVER puts a PLAYER over the TEAM. They can disagree with the teams handling of a player, but at the end of the day they accept the TEAM's decision. You clearly cannot.Originally Posted by Pacopete4
Originally Posted by cpk1994
I can't? haha.. just because I don't like it and say something about it doesnt mean that every sunday I'm not pulling on my packers jersey as usual fired up for the game supporting my team.... god ur just... uh! just shut up please...
Don't mean to interject in your dumbass fight, but this above comment is the dumbest thing I have read here to date. My god. Who are you to say what makes and doesn't make a fan?Originally Posted by cpk1994
Rushing Touchdowns dont count?Originally Posted by Pacopete4
Rodgers first year starting >>>> Favre's first year starting.
Really? They went 9-7. Get back to me when that happens.Originally Posted by Chevelle2
Favre is playing well - no doubt. But Rodgers is also playing very well, and has kept pace enough that Ted must be pretty secure in his decision at this point.
Well see, but anything short of a playoff appearance could make TT not be so happy about it. Hard to go from 13-3 and possibly watching favre on anothe team not in the playoffs last year get in, and watch the packers not.Originally Posted by Scott Campbell
Still a lot of football to go, but that will ultimately show if he made a good move. It's not as if rodgers wouldn't be just as good next year.
I don't think Ted is insecure with any decision he makes. Just like Col Jessup from "A Few Good Man", he made a command decision and thats the end of it.Originally Posted by Scott Campbell
They went 9-7. You're right. THEY. THE TEAM.Originally Posted by packerbacker1234
Favre? He threw 13, interceptions. 24 a year later.
Dumb fuck.
so your telling me theres a chance we can get rid of TT then? awesome! haha dont take it too hard, it was merely a jokeOriginally Posted by cpk1994
Originally Posted by packerbacker1234
Huh? Rodgers getting game experience is good for his progression. Just as it would be for any young QB.
Right now I don't see this team being any better with Brett on it. That surprises me.
Whats the montra? Just win baby. Rodgers isn't favre. Favre is not Rodgers. You can't compare how they play, as they play the position completely differently, especially young in their careers. Favre didn't even know what the heck a nickle defense was at that age.Originally Posted by Chevelle2
Yet, Favre kept winning. Leading comeback win after comeback win, and bringing excitement to watching GB football again. It is about the W's, not the stats.
They are both 3-3 thru their first 6 games of their career.Originally Posted by packerbacker1234
So, thats tied.
Tie breaker = Stats.
Which goes to Rodgers.
Time for bed.
Well, TT wil die one day so he won't be the Packers GM forever. Nice try, you fail(again).Originally Posted by Pacopete4
Originally Posted by Chevelle2
Haha. You realize they started their careers also in two completely different eras. Favre was in the era when hitting the QB late, or really hitting the QB at all (such as nailing him as hard you can, helemt, arm, etc.) was allowed. ANd boy, did BRett get hit.
AR started in the era where hitting QB's draws penalties. Lots of them. Usually considered the Peyton Manning rule, because manning only really excelled after that rule was put into play.
Originally Posted by packerbacker1234