Still waiting.Originally Posted by Partial
The point you made was "who was texting" it was rare. You never said compared today.
Nobody but you would consider 100 million rare. 100 mill is less than today. Rare. Not a chance.
Still waiting.Originally Posted by Partial
The point you made was "who was texting" it was rare. You never said compared today.
Nobody but you would consider 100 million rare. 100 mill is less than today. Rare. Not a chance.
where have I witnessed such scintillating debate before?
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Isn't it implied that it's compared to today? Regardless, it is rare when it looking at it compared to today. The total texts and texts per user are both micro-fractions of what they are.Originally Posted by Tyrone Bigguns
No. It isn't implied.Originally Posted by Partial
Camparison is a strawman.
Rare is rare. There aren't degrees.
That's the truthOriginally Posted by Tyrone Bigguns
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
We now interrupt this inane argument with a picture of a hot cheerleader.
All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!
It isn't an argument, it is an excercise.Originally Posted by Cheesehead Craig
It's all good, Falco. I thought it was clear, but I'll to be more fluent, unlike Partial's twist and turn arguments. Partial would make a great Internet lawyer like Johnnie Cochran, "If you don't get my post's gists, I gotta give it some 180 twists.".Originally Posted by falco
Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.