http://www.startribune.com/sports/70504472.html
Good clip...."I'm just thinking out loud" lol
http://www.startribune.com/sports/70504472.html
Good clip...."I'm just thinking out loud" lol
Baah
Nice vid but why not put it in the "Brett the fucking Viking" thread? In fact why not all these other dorky Brett threads as well?Originally Posted by gex
Sweet donkey fuck.....why not just start a Viking section to the forum? That would give us a place to put gems like "The Power of the Mullet".
LOL...i was certainly shocked to log on only to see several favre threads on page 1...Originally Posted by Freak Out
They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!
Brew Crew in 2011!!!
(while the link is still in my clipboard)
I agree with Freak Out. This is getting out of hand. Favre is a Viking...he has his OWN thread...leave it there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!
Stop whining. As if we're going to stop talking about Favre - ever. Or other players and teams that impact the Packers - or not. People just need to have thicker skin. Insult me - I can take it.Originally Posted by Zool
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
You guys are being outrageous. If Favre stuff is not allowed, then any player not on the Packers should not be allowed. Whether you like it or not, Brett Favre is the biggest thing to come through GB in a long, long, long time and will be a huge part of their history. There is absolutely nothing wrong with posting this vid.
we went thru this before. The Favre thread was created for all favre related shit.
Favre is Viking. This isn't a sports forum. It is a Packer forum. Shit has no place here, cept for the Favre thread.
What about all of your ramblings about Ruvell Martin, another ex-Packer?Originally Posted by Tyrone Bigguns
The fact of the matter is this: The thread was clearly labeled and you know what it was going to be about, yet you guys came in to "bump" it up instead of letting it die. If you had a problem with it, simply do not post in it. Is that really so hard?
Saying you can have threads about one player but not another sets a really ugly precedent and its not something I'm interested in being a part of. Where does the censorship stop, in that case? This forum was founded under a set of core beliefs. Start living them and stop bitching.
It's not like you didn't know what you were getting into. You made the decision to open the thread and make a comment about it. Take some personal accountability instead of trying to take away from others enjoyment.
Dipshit. That was ONE thread..just as there is already ONE thread about Bert. What point don't you get. Man, you are slow.Originally Posted by Partial
You are honestly trying to compare one thread about a recent departure in RM to multiple threads about Bert? LOL
Nobody is censoring anything. There is a Bert thread. Post bert related shit in that thread.
If you arent' interested in being a part of that..then go. No one is begging you to stay.
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#471801Originally Posted by Tyrone Bigguns
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#469012
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#450743
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#450672
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#445473
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#473145
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#468452
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#466089
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#462189
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#461094
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#455075
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#454214
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#453408
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#453121
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#450743
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#450696
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#450312
I could continue, but why bother? One thread? You're a bloody hypocrite. Bohica, brother
Partial vs. Ty. Is there any peace in Packer Nation?
Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.
Wow. You really are a moron. How many of those were Ruvell Martin threads?Originally Posted by Partial
Your first link is to ANOTHER Bert thread. Talk about making our point for us. Another Bert thread in the packer forum.
The issue is THREADS started, not occasionally bringing up his name.
2nd link is about Jake Allen. Hmm. Wonder why RM would be mentioned. And, what is funny is you are so stupid. Ty didn't bring up his name...and was positive about him. LOL
Third link. Add any player from any team. Again, one can mention Bert or Ruvell. Wow. you are kinda dumb.
4th. YOU made ruvell the issue. The issue was about your opinions. You "bumped" a thread to make yourself look smart. Harv asked if we should bump old threads of yours where you were wrong.
Ty used your "gushing" over ruvell as an example. There was no talk about him. My god, it might help if you actually read the posts before you tried to use them to support your foolishness.
5th link. Ty responded to your QUOTE about MM and cutting RM. And, didn't even use RM in my post. My point was about MM. Sheesh. You are really a maroon.
6th link. In the badger forum. You opine on the talent level. ty notes your ability to judge talent isn't good based on Money Morency and RM. See, that is called relevance. The issue is your ability..thus we need some examples of your ability.
I'm not going to continue, as i can tell it will be more of this type of stupidity.
Aren't you leaving?
You will notice that Ty's original post was no different than several others, nor did it address anyone specifically.Originally Posted by SnakeLH2006
You will notice that Partial didn't address anyone specifically...until my post.
Draw your own conclusion.
Is there even a Packer board anymore on here? Seems like Vikings central lately...Thank god the Bears suck or we'd have to deal with the Bear fans, too.
Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.
I knew I'd get partial fired up with the Mullet comment.
can we just do a nice little ban sweep and get rid of the jackasses please?
really... it's a packers forum... we go over this every time and we hear the same arguments every time that get owned and we never hear from partial again (until the next thread comes up so he can act like he never got owned in the first place).
the whole semantic / logic thing of "well then we cant talk about any other player" is ridiculous ... how bout i dont want to come here and see a fucking youtube video of favre saying this or that... how hard is that to understand you dickweeds?
I, for one, can do without the snarkiness about Favre threads and the addition of Favre threads. Keep it one area, PERIOD.
I know he is revered by a lot of fellow 'Rats, but let it freakin' go! Your admiration about him isn't going to bring him back. The vitriol spewed by those on the opposite side is turning a lot of us off as well.
Best thing to do, is not have all these extra BF threads. I respectfully ask Admin to please get this resolved.
It's one of the reasons, I have avoided posting as much as I had in the past.
I don't want to see any more Star-Trib or PioneerPress about the Vikings' players, which Favre is (for better or worse).
</rant>
-digital dean
No "TROLLS" allowed!