But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
SI_DougFarrar @SI_DougFarrar 33m33 minutes ago
Packers formation-diverse vs. CHI. They'd run 11 personnel 76% thru 3 games, but went heavy 12 base & more WR wrinkles. Made a difference.
SI_DougFarrar @SI_DougFarrar 30m30 minutes ago
Second-quarter TD to Cobb came out of a two-slot WR package Packers used a few times. Created iso matchups vs. man coverage. Go figure!
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Jarad Allen reportedly lost 18 pounds with a bout of pneumonia:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ith-pneumonia/
While I'm not sorry the Packers missed facing him, that's some serious shit. As long as he gets the time to get back in shape, there should be no lasting effects.
Fire Murphy, Gute, MLF, Barry, Senavich, etc!
Maybe. But consider an alternate scenario. I would bet you that loose ball control that was clearly over the line (plus control of ball when on the ground) would yield a TD call that would stand up to being reversed. Of course, I am probably forgetting about the rules section that covers this exact scenario that might render my argument moot.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Bob McGinn @BobMcGinn 5m5 minutes ago
The #Packers' roster has stood at 52 players for 13 days now.
Maybe he's shopping for a DT.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
http://www.footballbyfootball.com/co...-high-coverage
Originally Posted by Lions GameSolution? Skip the run (unless you want to run zone and put Starks in), put in Harris and throw it to middle of field and the flats.Originally Posted by Bears Game
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
I don't understand why the Packers roster is at 52. Why didn't they call up Jumal Rolle and not lose him to Houston? I don't get. It's not to save a small chunk of salary, is it?
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
They forgot. Fire Slocum!
C.H.U.D.
They are relatively healthy, so there isn't much need to fill the spot with a guy who will be inactive every game anyway.
As for Rolle, they have 6 healthy corners on the roster now, not much need for a 7th.
Besides, this will give them a roster spot to activate Tretter in a few weeks without having to release anyone.
Pretty crazy that the whole defensive backfield is healthy! The 6th CB, Goodson, has he dressed yet? The Packers kept him, now at the expense of Rolle, who looked a lot better in the pre-season, I wonder what the plans are for bringing him along now that he's healthy.
We also haven't seen much of Richardson, who I thought would be on the field a lot more, but seems to be behind Burnett
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Makes little sense. It's saves a little bit of money, but doesn't reward guys on the practice squad. The Packers have a good reputation for building within, but this seems cheap. Why not call up Dorsey or White with Boykin out.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
The 53rd spot is for Jesus.
70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.