Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7
Results 121 to 140 of 140

Thread: Week 4 Other Games

  1. #121
    Quote Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
    What's kind of funny is that seemingly no one on the planet - not Jim Caldwell, not Jon Gruden, not the fans, nobody - knew this rule. Tirico never said a word. The coaches didn't bitch at all. It wasn't until after when somebody postgame interviewed a ref that this came up.

    So essentially the rule was there but no one really seemed to know that. Had Caldwell or one of his assistants known the rule, he might've immediately jumped the officials about it, so they might've then huddled briefly (pretending it was their idea) and then thrown a flag.
    Very good point. The Lions should have raised a stink. I didn't know the rules exactly, but I knew a defender must not be able to earn a touch back by batting the ball out of the endzone. It was like the announcers and coaches just wanted to get out of the noisy stadium and turn in.

  2. #122
    Quote Originally Posted by Guiness View Post
    I was thinking the same thing no one said a word, including on this board
    That sounds like a shot at pbmax. This happened on his watch as forum crier.



  3. #123
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,579
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    Very good point. The Lions should have raised a stink. I didn't know the rules exactly, but I knew a defender must not be able to earn a touch back by batting the ball out of the endzone. It was like the announcers and coaches just wanted to get out of the noisy stadium and turn in.
    I thought it was odd as well, like a holy roller in reverse, but no one said anything so I disregarded it. Funny though, this is the second time it's come up this season, another team fumbled the ball through the opponent's end zone and had possession taken away and I was surprised by the ruling.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  4. #124
    Wouldn't have even guessed at that one. All the cases I could think of once I heard about the missed call were legal. Barely knew that there was an illegal case.

    However, I should have known. Database guys uncovered 12 calls of illegal batting of the football since 2010. 8 were accepted, 4 declined. Included in that is one by Pittsburgh, penalty accepted by Green Bay in 2010. Estus Hood batted a blocked FG kick illegally. Packers accepted and drive for a TD.

    2 of these included balls in the end zone. Zebras should have know. Chris Maragos (Seattle-Badgers) had one called against him in 2013 versus the 49ers during a punt.

    Near end of article: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/clu...ounters-week-4

    Source: http://www.nflpenalties.com/
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  5. #125
    Kevin Seifert ‏@SeifertESPN 8h8 hours ago
    Three years later, Lance Easley still receives email from people who want him to die: http://es.pn/1j4JoVn

    This is one of those rare occasions where the internet mob is onto something. This guy needs to stop answering his phone. Does his agent email every NFCN reporter after every controversial call?
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  6. #126
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,937
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    However, I should have known. Database guys uncovered 12 calls of illegal batting of the football since 2010. 8 were accepted, 4 declined. Included in that is one by Pittsburgh, penalty accepted by Green Bay in 2010. Estus Hood batted a blocked FG kick illegally. Packers accepted and drive for a TD.

    Near end of article: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/clu...ounters-week-4

    Source: http://www.nflpenalties.com/
    You threw me on this. Estus Hood was a Packer DB in the late 70's. Thought maybe he had a kid with the Steelers in 2010.
    Article states "E. Hood" a DL. That would be Evander "Ziggy" Hood.

  7. #127
    Would you believe that was today's second trivia question?
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  8. #128
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand View Post
    In case you missed it:



    Cleveland does something to a man, and it usually isn't good. #factoryofsadness
    Tramon was done in not by his mistake, but by the collective shrug people give to the Browns about getting details right, like whether or not someone in an orange helmet is offside or not.

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...to-the-browns/

    Tramontana maintained that the League admitted an error, but they deny it. However, Florio thinks TW has a case:

    The All-22 footage available the the NFL’s Game Rewind feature has two angles that suggest that the flag shouldn’t have been thrown. In one angle, it’s clear that Williams is lined up alongside his teammates. In the other angle, it’s clear that he times the snap perfectly, moving at the same instant the ball is lifted off the ground by the snapper.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  9. #129
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    In line, on the LOS and adjacent, I think that is still legal.

    I do agree with Paul Zimmerman, they should just outlaw blocks below the waist.
    Same play was called tonight on the LOS. The only problem was it was not egregious. In fact, I don't think the Texans blocker even hit the Colts rushed below the waist. He hit him above the hip. Kind of weird because the more I read about this, I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a penalty. Well, it should be illegal, but I"m not sure if it is. The Texans tonight was not nearly as bad as this block.

    I did find video. I wish ESPN would have pointed it out. Maybe there'd be more buzz to make these blocks illegal.

    This Ugly Block From The Seahawks Resulted In A Gruesome Broken Leg
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  10. #130
    I don't know why they won't ban the low blocks. Is this wrestlinnnnnnnnnnnnnnng? No. Ban that shit.

  11. #131
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    Same play was called tonight on the LOS. The only problem was it was not egregious. In fact, I don't think the Texans blocker even hit the Colts rushed below the waist. He hit him above the hip. Kind of weird because the more I read about this, I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a penalty. Well, it should be illegal, but I"m not sure if it is. The Texans tonight was not nearly as bad as this block.

    I did find video. I wish ESPN would have pointed it out. Maybe there'd be more buzz to make these blocks illegal.

    This Ugly Block From The Seahawks Resulted In A Gruesome Broken Leg
    Yeah, I saw the block that got called tonight. It might be illegal, but the explanation from Dumb and Dumber wasn't right.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  12. #132
    Thanks for the link Harv. I am not sure that's illegal, and if it is, it's block from behind call and not a "while the defender was engaged" call.

    It is immoral and unethical, because the Guard is diving with his full weight at the side of the DT's knee and leg and the only way to knock him down is to collapse the leg from the side. He doesn't move far enough to get his head or elbow in front of the player. He just collapsed his leg like they did to Jurko in Dallas.

    He is barely, briefly engaged with the Center, who is running past him to get play-side and kick out the other DT or ILB. The Center is trying to run away from him and its the Lion who puts his hands on the Seahawks briefly after the C tired to rush pat him.

    Its why they should just ban going low.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  13. #133
    From that link:

    Again, to reiterate, this type of chop block is legal. On a running play, an offensive lineman can engage a player below the waist provided he is not more than one position away from the initial block. In layman’s terms, the right guard can chop the nose tackle engaged with the center. The right tackle cannot.
    So the Colts-Texans call was because it was a pass. The Seahawks non-call was because even if you judged it to be a chop block (two guys engaged on one defender, one high and one low), its legal if its a run play and they are adjacent.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  14. #134
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,579
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    From that link:



    So the Colts-Texans call was because it was a pass. The Seahawks non-call was because even if you judged it to be a chop block (two guys engaged on one defender, one high and one low), its legal if its a run play and they are adjacent.
    ???

    I always thought you couldn't hit low if he was already engaged. Never seen this convoluted verbiage before.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  15. #135
    Quote Originally Posted by esoxx View Post
    We will.

    Doesn't look that fun.

  16. #136
    Prescient Rat HOFer esoxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,813
    Quote Originally Posted by Rastak View Post
    Doesn't look that fun.
    Wow you held on to that comment for 28 days.

    Bitter often?

  17. #137
    Quote Originally Posted by esoxx View Post
    Wow you held on to that comment for 28 days.

    Bitter often?
    Oh c'mon esoxx. Ras earned that one. Can't hold one as good as that against someone.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  18. #138
    lol

  19. #139
    Prescient Rat HOFer esoxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,813
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Oh c'mon esoxx. Ras earned that one. Can't hold one as good as that against someone.
    You're right. I'm sure if the packers rolled I would have went back to a comment made some 28 days earlier to rub it in. Who carries something like that around for a month is what I would like to know.

    But rock on.

  20. #140
    Quote Originally Posted by esoxx View Post
    You're right. I'm sure if the packers rolled I would have went back to a comment made some 28 days earlier to rub it in. Who carries something like that around for a month is what I would like to know.

    But rock on.
    Well, on this board Ras is the odd one out, so his memory is probably longer than most. But he is a good dude stuck rooting for an expansion team

    Just kidding Ras!
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •