A bad trade. Randall is no shutdown corner and he’s the mother of inconsistency, but the Packers got rid of their best corner for a carbon copy of Hundley.
If you’re gonna trade for a Brownie, trade for Flash.
A bad trade. Randall is no shutdown corner and he’s the mother of inconsistency, but the Packers got rid of their best corner for a carbon copy of Hundley.
If you’re gonna trade for a Brownie, trade for Flash.
Kizer can throw the ball more than 5 yards downfield, so he's no carbon copy of Hundley. Hundley was more of a carbon copy of Rich Campbell.Originally Posted by Anti-Polar Bear
Fire Murphy, Gute, MLF, Barry, Senavich, etc!
Kizer completed only 53% of his passes last season. He has accuracy issues. Ditto, Hundley. Both are inaccurate, indecisive in the pocket, uninspiring and turnover prone. They actually look the same, too, physically.
Saw this while I was jogging past PB's packerrats twitter feed:
Gil Brandt
Verified account @Gil_Brandt
Funny how I'm reading Packers loved DeShone Kizer in last years draft. Half of Green Bay's front office is in Cleveland, which just dumped him for Tyrod Taylor.
It's possible Gutekunst wanted to draft Kizer and Todd overruled him. More likely, it was McCarthy who was in love with Kizer. With the new power structure in the Packers' front office, McCarthy likely pulled a power play and got Murphy to sign off on the Randall for Kizer trade.
McCarthy can't judge talent. Last time McCarthy was asked for his endorsement on personal matters, he picked Alex Smith over the Great Arm of Butte.
Randall for a Hundley-clone reeks incompetence if anyone asks me.
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
The best possible endorsement of Kizer.
This goof wanted Tebow, Joey Harrington, Johnny Manziel and other stiffs.
If the worst judge of QB's thinks Kizer is no good, he must have great value.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote