Simple answer, AR wasn't playing to win Thursday night. He was playing to not lose, by the time he started playing to win, it was to late. Kinda goes back to the Rodgers gambling problem thread.
Simple answer, AR wasn't playing to win Thursday night. He was playing to not lose, by the time he started playing to win, it was to late. Kinda goes back to the Rodgers gambling problem thread.
Last edited by Rutnstrut; 09-07-2014 at 12:25 PM.
Actually, that is the reverse of the gambling problem mentioned in the other thread. But carry on.Originally Posted by Rutnstrut
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Wasn't that thread that he doesn't gamble enough or take enough chances? Isn't that the same as playing it too safe?
Playing it too safe at the end of the game, yes. Your impression of his approach in the Seattle game was too cautious early.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
And Rodgers is in cahoots with MM who doesn't want win because he isn't responsible to an owner and TT who is too arrogant to admit a mistake with his draft picks.
Im watching SD v Seattle and Rivers is challenging the ENTIRE defense and looking awfully good...he threw at Sherman 3 times in the 1st half and completed all 3!!
His WR Allen is looking impressive v Sherman and the play calling has been not only great but exciting as well!!
Brandon Marshall, MAN...!!
Jimmie Johnson: Nascar's G.O.A.T......
Sittin' pretty
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote