Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: Apparently the on-roster replacements weren't enough - Jahri Evans signing

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rat-A-Tat-Tat Veteran BZnDallas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dirty South
    Posts
    747
    Hell I guess its your grading scale. Lol If you can't see the difference that's on you. We agree in that Evans isn't Lang. But Evans is better than what we had. So TT did what YOU asked by bringing in veteran talent. Now you don't give credit? That's on you.
    Now what y'all know about dem Texas boys
    Comin' down in candied toys, smokin' weed and talkin' noise!!!

  2. #2
    Red Devil Rat HOFer gbgary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    up the road from jerrahworld
    Posts
    14,529
    Quote Originally Posted by BZnDallas View Post
    Hell I guess its your grading scale. Lol If you can't see the difference that's on you. We agree in that Evans isn't Lang. But Evans is better than what we had. So TT did what YOU asked by bringing in veteran talent. Now you don't give credit? That's on you.
    we had lang but let him go. if you agree that evans isn't as good as lang then you must agree we're worse at that position. i'd have given tt credit had he resigned lang.

  3. #3
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,632
    Quote Originally Posted by gbgary View Post
    we had lang but let him go. if you agree that evans isn't as good as lang then you must agree we're worse at that position. i'd have given tt credit had he resigned lang.
    We most certainly DID NOT have lang. He was a FA. Unrestricted no less. He got paid like a tackle. Glad for him. Glad TT isn't the guy who did pay him.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  4. #4
    Red Devil Rat HOFer gbgary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    up the road from jerrahworld
    Posts
    14,529
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    We most certainly DID NOT have lang. He was a FA. Unrestricted no less. He got paid like a tackle. Glad for him. Glad TT isn't the guy who did pay him.
    all tt had to do to keep lang was pay him. cap wasn't an issue. we're talking about whether free agency has improved the Packers this season. has it? well obviously no. an upgrade at one position doesn't make it so.

    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    So when you compare an injured TE who can't block to Bennet and you compare Lang to Evans you don't call that a net win?
    cook vs bennett: upgrade with bennett. lang vs evans: downgrade with evans (evidently the Packers coaches were very upset about the lang loss)

  5. #5
    Rat-A-Tat-Tat Veteran BZnDallas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dirty South
    Posts
    747
    Quote Originally Posted by gbgary View Post
    all tt had to do to keep lang was pay him. cap wasn't an issue. we're talking about whether free agency has improved the Packers this season. has it? well obviously no. an upgrade at one position doesn't make it so.



    cook vs bennett: upgrade with bennett. lang vs evans: downgrade with evans (evidently the Packers coaches were very upset about the lang loss)
    You don't pay top dollar to the least important position on the offensive line. TT has a clear record of that, do we need to list them? Let me rephrase that. GOOD teams don't pay top dollar to Guards. That's why the Lions did....
    Now what y'all know about dem Texas boys
    Comin' down in candied toys, smokin' weed and talkin' noise!!!

  6. #6
    Red Devil Rat HOFer gbgary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    up the road from jerrahworld
    Posts
    14,529
    Quote Originally Posted by BZnDallas View Post
    You don't pay top dollar to the least important position on the offensive line. TT has a clear record of that, do we need to list them? Let me rephrase that. GOOD teams don't pay top dollar to Guards. That's why the Lions did....
    but are we better on the field for tt's thrift? we're simply not. THIS Packers team needs upgrades to go to the superbowl.

  7. #7
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,711
    Quote Originally Posted by gbgary View Post
    but are we better on the field for tt's thrift? we're simply not. THIS Packers team needs upgrades to go to the superbowl.
    But not all upgrades come from free agency. Upgrades also come from players getting healthy, players improving, the draft, better schemes etc.

    I think the improvement at the TE position (Don't forget Kendricks) will at least offset the losses on the offensive line.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •