Results 1 to 20 of 163

Thread: Cap affect of paying as you go vs pushing out and having dead space

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    if the cap goes up every single year the way it has been going, then it makes sense to kick the can down the road

    lets take year 1, you have a guy with a 20 million dollar cap hit, and the cap is 200 million. that guy is taking up 10% of the cap

    but you can somehow kick that 20 down the road a couple years to where the cap is gonna be 300 million. now that guys 20 million dollar cap number is only taking up 5% of the cap

    so in the long run you win. (i used easy to use numbers, and not real life numbers that suck)

    does that make any sense?

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    if the cap goes up every single year the way it has been going, then it makes sense to kick the can down the road

    lets take year 1, you have a guy with a 20 million dollar cap hit, and the cap is 200 million. that guy is taking up 10% of the cap

    but you can somehow kick that 20 down the road a couple years to where the cap is gonna be 300 million. now that guys 20 million dollar cap number is only taking up 5% of the cap

    so in the long run you win. (i used easy to use numbers, and not real life numbers that suck)

    does that make any sense?
    A couple points.

    Every team gets the same bump and if they don't kick the can they can sign that covered free agent instead of you.

    You lose the future cap whether you cut or trade the player, so your future team could miss out on a new signing (see first point above) and not even have the original player that's costing you on the roster.

    You can get in situations where it makes more sense to keep a player on the roster that you would otherwise cut or trade. Then you carry both the cap hit pushed forward and their yearly salary costing even more total for a player you don't want

  3. #3
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,066
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    if the cap goes up every single year the way it has been going, then it makes sense to kick the can down the road

    lets take year 1, you have a guy with a 20 million dollar cap hit, and the cap is 200 million. that guy is taking up 10% of the cap

    but you can somehow kick that 20 down the road a couple years to where the cap is gonna be 300 million. now that guys 20 million dollar cap number is only taking up 5% of the cap

    so in the long run you win. (i used easy to use numbers, and not real life numbers that suck)

    does that make any sense?
    20/300 = 6.67% not 5%
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderDan View Post
    20/300 = 6.67% not 5%
    damnit

    so much for easy to use numbers

    thanks for the correction

  5. #5
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,066
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    if the cap goes up every single year the way it has been going, then it makes sense to kick the can down the road

    lets take year 1, you have a guy with a 20 million dollar cap hit, and the cap is 200 million. that guy is taking up 10% of the cap

    but you can somehow kick that 20 down the road a couple years to where the cap is gonna be 300 million. now that guys 20 million dollar cap number is only taking up 5% of the cap

    so in the long run you win. (i used easy to use numbers, and not real life numbers that suck)

    does that make any sense?
    The problem with that thinking is that the owners have to pay a certain percentage of the cap each year. So contracts tend to increase the same amount as the salary cap.

    That leads to, paying less for player A but more for player B who signed his contract this year and not 2 years ago.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  6. #6
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,615
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    if the cap goes up every single year the way it has been going, then it makes sense to kick the can down the road

    lets take year 1, you have a guy with a 20 million dollar cap hit, and the cap is 200 million. that guy is taking up 10% of the cap

    but you can somehow kick that 20 down the road a couple years to where the cap is gonna be 300 million. now that guys 20 million dollar cap number is only taking up 5% of the cap

    so in the long run you win. (i used easy to use numbers, and not real life numbers that suck)

    does that make any sense?
    See...all I read is that in several years you are handicapped 5% against the cap vs. a team that didn't kick it down the road. Sure, its a good move if you plan on being GM for only a couple years (Rodgers), but not so great for your successor (Love).
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •