Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: Might Richard Rodgers be a better prospect than we think?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    For his size I expected RR to be a better blocker that he was. If he learns that part of the game, he could be a pretty good old-school TE, lining up next to the tackle and blocking or running routes. Chewy would be his ceiling, which is pretty good. With Lacy, having a TE that can block or catch well is good for making the offense less predictable.
    Fire Murphy, Gute, MLF, Barry, Senavich, etc!

  2. #2
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,713
    Quote Originally Posted by MadScientist View Post
    For his size I expected RR to be a better blocker that he was. If he learns that part of the game, he could be a pretty good old-school TE, lining up next to the tackle and blocking or running routes. Chewy would be his ceiling, which is pretty good. With Lacy, having a TE that can block or catch well is good for making the offense less predictable.
    Blocking techniques can be learned. Chewy wasn't a good blocker coming out of Boston College, but he became one of the best.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •