Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: Studs And Duds - Packers vs. Bucs

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The packer run defense was weak. Not sure where dud lies.

  2. #2
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    The packer run defense was weak. Not sure where dud lies.
    Some of that is Capers and the weak fronts he likes to play, but regardless of personnel on either side - Martinez and Ryan were pathetic.

    I just FF'd and slo-mo'd thru the game... neither one of those guys should be starting in the NFL. Probably not good enough to be backups on most teams... but, of course, we're stuck with them like we're stuck with Randall and Capers. None of those guys is going anywhere, anytime soon.
    wist

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    Some of that is Capers and the weak fronts he likes to play, but regardless of personnel on either side - Martinez and Ryan were pathetic.

    I just FF'd and slo-mo'd thru the game... neither one of those guys should be starting in the NFL. Probably not good enough to be backups on most teams... but, of course, we're stuck with them like we're stuck with Randall and Capers. None of those guys is going anywhere, anytime soon.
    Seriously you are worse than a broken clock. In this case, you ring for the second half performance.

    In the first half those horrid ILBs allowed 13 carries to go for 41 yards, an average of 3.2 ypc.

    In the second half, Clark and Ryan got hurt and were replaced by Dial and Joe Thomas. Matthews also spent some time inside and the Bucs figured out something in their run game.

    Second half they were 22 for 124, 5.6 ypc. For the game, those horrid ILBs, even injured, allowed 4.7 ypc.

    For the season, Packers Run D is 7th best in the League at -19.8 DVOA. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef

    http://www.nfl.com/liveupdate/gamece...B_Gamebook.pdf
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  4. #4
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Seriously you are worse than a broken clock. In this case, you ring for the second half performance.

    In the first half those horrid ILBs allowed 13 carries to go for 41 yards, an average of 3.2 ypc.

    In the second half, Clark and Ryan got hurt and were replaced by Dial and Joe Thomas. Matthews also spent some time inside and the Bucs figured out something in their run game.

    Second half they were 22 for 124, 5.6 ypc. For the game, those horrid ILBs, even injured, allowed 4.7 ypc.

    For the season, Packers Run D is 7th best in the League at -19.8 DVOA. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef

    http://www.nfl.com/liveupdate/gamece...B_Gamebook.pdf
    The tape don't lie... they can't play. Both Ryan and Martinez are poor players.

    Perhaps better coaching, a new DC, and a new scheme can help, but I doubt it. They lack instincts and anticipation.

    Good for homers like you though max... you got the defense and the DC you like.

    -----------------

    Here's a question for you...

    Barber caught a screen pass for 34 yds (2nd or 3rd Qtr I think) nary a Packer on the screen. Watching that play unfold, who is at fault on the Packer defense??

    Ryan?? As he turned his back to the LOS after he realized it wasn't a run, and had no clue as to what was actually happening on the play. Do the Packers defensive coaches really teach their LB's to transition from their 1st responsibility to their second, in this case underneath coverage on the crossing route, by completely turning their back on the play??

    Or,

    Capers and the coaching staff?? Whose scheme and play call put Ryan in that position??

    Or,

    Is no one at fault, as relatively uncontested 34 yd gains are acceptable, as long as it doesn't result in a score??
    wist

  5. #5
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    The tape don't lie... they can't play. Both Ryan and Martinez are poor players.

    Perhaps better coaching, a new DC, and a new scheme can help, but I doubt it. They lack instincts and anticipation.

    Good for homers like you though max... you got the defense and the DC you like.

    -----------------

    Here's a question for you...

    Barber caught a screen pass for 34 yds (2nd or 3rd Qtr I think) nary a Packer on the screen. Watching that play unfold, who is at fault on the Packer defense??

    Ryan?? As he turned his back to the LOS after he realized it wasn't a run, and had no clue as to what was actually happening on the play. Do the Packers defensive coaches really teach their LB's to transition from their 1st responsibility to their second, in this case underneath coverage on the crossing route, by completely turning their back on the play??

    Or,

    Capers and the coaching staff?? Whose scheme and play call put Ryan in that position??

    Or,

    Is no one at fault, as relatively uncontested 34 yd gains are acceptable, as long as it doesn't result in a score??
    Martinez is a poor player??

  6. #6
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugger View Post
    Martinez is a poor player??
    No instincts... not a play maker.

    Very pedestrian player.
    wist

  7. #7
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    No instincts... not a play maker.

    Very pedestrian player.
    If he is pedestrian then why is he ranked 4th in the league in tackles?

    http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorysta...seasonType=REG

  8. #8
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Seriously you are worse than a broken clock.
    get him a SPRIGGS™ watch!
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •