Richard Rodgers got blasted on the safety play as well. No one on that side save Bulaga had a block worth a damn.
Richard Rodgers got blasted on the safety play as well. No one on that side save Bulaga had a block worth a damn.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
That was a terrible, scared play call. Running the ball out of a single back formation against that mean Detriot front? Stupid. Might as well just take a knee in the endzone.Originally Posted by pbmax
And of ALL guys to run, they try Lacy. They would have been better off with a qb sneak to start. Running Lacy intentionally to the side and then seeing Lacy run scared later in game instead of hitting the hole, were equally pathetic.
Hoes:
THREE turnovers and we still lose the game. Offensive line was bitch slapped all day long. The entire line stunk. Bulaga was of no extra help. Even keeping Lacy in max protect didn't help
WRs (they didn't step up vs. the scrub DB's of the Lions, plus too many drops by Boykin, Adams)
A-Rod missed Nelson for a TD late.
Offense as a whole failed to show up.
Still a lot of missed tackles on D. House had a couple, so did Neal.
Pimps:
Peppers strip sack
Capers did his part on planning on this game
-digital dean
No "TROLLS" allowed!
Running in that situation shouldn't be a problem. To get 1 or 2 yards to operate with.
Not sure that was the right play call though. No one blocked it well. No run play works well if you don't block.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Another (naive?) question for Stubby: If your game plan calls for using the TE's as blockers exclusively, why use the TE's? Why not just let a guy like Lane Taylor be a designated TE for the game...or at least for the Lacy safety play?
One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers
The defense would react to the lack of a skilled, eligible receiver at TE. Meaning coverage would be directed elsewhere.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
On that note, did Kevin Barry ever catch a pass after being 'designated eligible' in the U-62 formation?
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Didn't JJ Watt catch a TD pass this year? Don't know where he lined up.
Still, even if the defense reacted as you say, in a run situation at least we've got a stout blocker who won't get blasted out so easily.
One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers
Oh, you can do it. Belichick went on last week in great detail why he prefers a Tackle at TE over an unbalanced line. And throwing to that tackle is one way to make the D pay for not treating the Tackle like an eligible player. Belichick and Parcells did this for years.
I was simply commenting on why it might not be the first choice.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Belichick and Parcells always seem to think outside the box. It's why I like them and why they are elite coaches.
One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote