An interview gets everyone on record. So if there are subsequent revelations, all statements are in play. That is on pretty solid logical ground.

What is highly questionable is the level of seriousness to give to this complaint. If its just a recanted interview (and no records*), then just where do you draw the line on unsubstantiated claims made publicly?


* something that may not apply to Peyton Manning, who along with Neal, seemed to have an established relationship with on or more people at this clinic.