Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Exactly.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,710
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    One point not explicitly made by Stuart but brought up by Brian Burke at Advanced Football Stats, is that because the NFL measures everything rounded to an yard, simple accuracy is missing in a lot of running back yardage stats. When you are trying to decipher whether a drop from a 4.5 ypc to 4.1 is a bad omen, it doesn't help that a lot of the fluctuation could be rounding.
    It could be, but isn't it more likely that rounding would even itself out over the course of a season?
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    It could be, but isn't it more likely that rounding would even itself out over the course of a season?
    On average, , yes.

    But there are always exceptions.

    The best point the article makes is the even/odd splits. The discrepancy points out that there are WAY too many other factors happening with the YPC stat to use it to judge a RBs performance.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •