Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Paying Running Backs Large Sums is Dumb

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 02-28-2017, 08:46 PM #1
    bobblehead
    bobblehead is offline
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,623
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Alternate title: C'mon Bobble, let's have an argument.

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...drian-peterson



    EPA: expected points added
    WPA: win probability added
    But I agree 100% with the thread title. Its the OL that makes a running game, backs are a dime a dozen.

    Its like you don't even know me
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-01-2017, 08:57 AM #2
    pbmax
    pbmax is offline
    Mad Rat HOFer pbmax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    67,364
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    But I agree 100% with the thread title. Its the OL that makes a running game, backs are a dime a dozen.

    Its like you don't even know me
    Just sending out a ping to get a response.

    Actually worried about Patler not being around.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules