If MM's strategy and coaching was so poor, how did we get ahead 16-0 and 19-7? Was it a complete fluke?Originally Posted by woodbuck27
Obviously he had a pretty good game plan to beat SEA at SEA and I would say that GB is the only team all year that made SEA look bad.
But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
OK I cannot ignore this:
ThunderDan maybe? ... open that mind of yours.
Before you made this post did you read the article and all (or most of) the comments?
Surely this isn't the 'only' group of Packer fans that refuse to get it !
An original game plan must stand up for a complete four quarters. A full 60 minutes. If it's not working then 'of course' that plan must be altered to compensate for anything predicting a loss.
You don't bull headedly focus a game plan on targets. You better be flexible and thinking on your feet. You better allow input.
In Regulation Green Bay had the ball 4:30 longer than the Seattle Seahawks and we see that solid lead at the half.
What are you doing introducing baloney and the term 'fluke'. Get on point please.
The 'only' thing really obvious was the score. A proper analysis gets to the many reasons it got there. This article is clear as to Mike McCarthy's part in why this team was defeated in what he deemed 'a fun game'.
"A fun game". Holy shit Mike !
Vince Lombardi rolled over in his grave at that characterization of Green Bay @ Seattle last Sunday.
Seattle 28 - Green Bay 22.
ThunderDan:
Read the article and do so open minded.
That article answers your questions.
** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote