no ones getting fired if we lose to day, if a-rod comes back next week, we'll probably end up with 9 wins
so even though the whole world has now seen how poor of a team we are without a-rod saving the day, nothing will change
HOFer
no ones getting fired if we lose to day, if a-rod comes back next week, we'll probably end up with 9 wins
so even though the whole world has now seen how poor of a team we are without a-rod saving the day, nothing will change
We aren't the only team that would suffer without their starting QB. If Atlanta or Seattle lost their starter for half the season they would suck too.Originally Posted by red
HOFer
no, they wouldn't, and thats the whole point
we were a super bowl contender with a-rod, and a bottom 5 team without him
other teams have lost their starting Qb's and have not fallen that far
hell look at the vikings
all of the vikings 'backups' have significant starting exp. Hardly comparable to Hundley. However it points out the lack of scouting and talent evaluation and quite frankly the coaching once Prissy Aaron went down how far this team has fallen
Not Minnesota it appears
LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?
Minnesota is the rare case where a team got better by losing their starting QB. Bradford completed a lot of passes, but Keenum makes more big plays.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote