View Poll Results: Which WR most closely develops, into our #1 WR in GREEN BAY

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • WATSON

    2 13.33%
  • WICKS

    7 46.67%
  • REED

    6 40.00%
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: WHO DEVELOPS INTO the NUMBER ONE WIDE RECEIVER in GB ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I'm confused by the definition of #1 WR.

    If it's the guy most likely to catch more passes, then it's gotta be Reed for me. He gets open and makes plays with the ball.

    If it's a guy you throw when not necessarily open, that's not Reed. I'd go with Wicks or Watson.

  2. #2
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,711
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpe1027 View Post
    I'm confused by the definition of #1 WR.

    If it's the guy most likely to catch more passes, then it's gotta be Reed for me. He gets open and makes plays with the ball.

    If it's a guy you throw when not necessarily open, that's not Reed. I'd go with Wicks or Watson.
    I think #1 is determined by 2 things:

    Who is the guy the QB wants to go to when he absolutely has to have a completion?
    Who is the guy the opponent is most concerned about?
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  3. #3
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,662
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpe1027 View Post
    I'm confused by the definition of #1 WR.

    If it's the guy most likely to catch more passes, then it's gotta be Reed for me. He gets open and makes plays with the ball.

    If it's a guy you throw when not necessarily open, that's not Reed. I'd go with Wicks or Watson.


    I struggled with the exact definition as well. I had started to define it, but instead decided to leave it out to spur on more debate.

    ROUGH stats I was going to throw out where perhaps, a 90-100 catch season/ 14-1500 yards
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  4. #4
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,711
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky View Post
    I struggled with the exact definition as well. I had started to define it, but instead decided to leave it out to spur on more debate.

    ROUGH stats I was going to throw out where perhaps, a 90-100 catch season/ 14-1500 yards
    1400-1500 is too high a bar. Only 5 guys in the entire NFL had 1400+. I think 1200 would be more like it.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  5. #5
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    1400-1500 is too high a bar. Only 5 guys in the entire NFL had 1400+. I think 1200 would be more like it.
    1200 and 10 touchdowns is definitely a #1
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  6. #6
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    Davante is a borderline HOFer and he’s only gone over 1200 and 10 4 times in 10 years.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •