Results 1 to 20 of 153

Thread: The Skinbasket Weighs in on New Redskins Nicknames

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    As for the Fightin' Whiteys and their shirts, the quote covers all the relevant differences. The Whitey are the majority and some/most in the area feel no particular compunction about the name being used by a minority group for profit. Its benign enough to, literally, buy into. Also, while Whitey might very well be used in a derogatory sense, there are multiple positive examples of it. Unless you are describing a potato, its not really an analogue for Redskins.

    I doubt the same reaction would be had if that team was named the Fightin' Hibes or Fightin' Kikes.

    The Redskins are not about to hand over a portion of ownership to Indigenous Americans nor are they currently sharing royalties over their trademarks.

    Skinbasket Clone may feel that no disrespect intended washes his hands clean, but he is only one end of the communication. In a commercial enterprise, the intent of a consumer is pretty irrelevant.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  2. #2
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    As for the Fightin' Whiteys and their shirts, the quote covers all the relevant differences. The Whitey are the majority and some/most in the area feel no particular compunction about the name being used by a minority group for profit. Its benign enough to, literally, buy into. Also, while Whitey might very well be used in a derogatory sense, there are multiple positive examples of it. Unless you are describing a potato, its not really an analogue for Redskins.

    I doubt the same reaction would be had if that team was named the Fightin' Hibes or Fightin' Kikes.

    The Redskins are not about to hand over a portion of ownership to Indigenous Americans nor are they currently sharing royalties over their trademarks.

    Skinbasket Clone may feel that no disrespect intended washes his hands clean, but he is only one end of the communication. In a commercial enterprise, the intent of a consumer is pretty irrelevant.
    Certainly the minority bullets in society feel discrimination, even though there are positive examples of them
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  3. #3
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    The Redskins are not about to hand over a portion of ownership to Indigenous Americans nor are they currently sharing royalties over their trademarks.

    It would be kinda hard to do that, considering the trademark represents a symbol of native americans that no longer exists. Where would you go to share royalties with gladiators? Maybe a case could be made for the Fighting Irish but I suppose you'd have to stop those majority people from pummeling you to hand over the cash.
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand View Post
    It would be kinda hard to do that, considering the trademark represents a symbol of native americans that no longer exists. Where would you go to share royalties with gladiators? Maybe a case could be made for the Fighting Irish but I suppose you'd have to stop those majority people from pummeling you to hand over the cash.
    I would have to stop the Fightin' Irish lawyers first, then the NCAA. Would be broke and dead before I got to the actual Irish.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  5. #5
    Wait-n-See Rat All-Pro Smeefers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Green Bay WI
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    As for the Fightin' Whiteys and their shirts, the quote covers all the relevant differences. The Whitey are the majority and some/most in the area feel no particular compunction about the name being used by a minority group for profit. Its benign enough to, literally, buy into. Also, while Whitey might very well be used in a derogatory sense, there are multiple positive examples of it. Unless you are describing a potato, its not really an analogue for Redskins.

    I doubt the same reaction would be had if that team was named the Fightin' Hibes or Fightin' Kikes.

    The Redskins are not about to hand over a portion of ownership to Indigenous Americans nor are they currently sharing royalties over their trademarks.

    Skinbasket Clone may feel that no disrespect intended washes his hands clean, but he is only one end of the communication. In a commercial enterprise, the intent of a consumer is pretty irrelevant.
    I disagree with your analogy to the fightin hibes or kikes.

    It would more be like the fighting tanskins or the whiteskins or the blackskins

    It's nowhere near something like the fighting n<censored>rskins.
    - Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Smeefers View Post
    I disagree with your analogy to the fightin hibes or kikes.

    It would more be like the fighting tanskins or the whiteskins or the blackskins

    It's nowhere near something like the fighting n<censored>rskins.
    Perhaps not as flammable as the fightin' n<censored>skins, but I think it has a history of derogatory usage beyond a simple comparable of color of skin. Yellow man, maybe, but I think closer to chink. The redskin usage is uncommon enough today that it doesn't seem at all to rise to the level of the n-word*, but I think its history is more bleak than recently memory has it. Having not done any reading on it beyond this topic, probably makes me unqualified to judge a comparison between the two.

    If they approached the tribes, I wonder if any of them would take them up on some kind of offer. The Seminoles were mentioned earlier, but redskin is general enough I am not sure any tribe would want to touch it.


    * At some point I will be adult enough to simply type n-word out correctly like I did chink, but something always holds me back. I think I fear Richard Pryor (or maybe Michael Richards) yelling at me from the stage.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Perhaps not as flammable as the fightin' n<censored>skins, but I think it has a history of derogatory usage beyond a simple comparable of color of skin. Yellow man, maybe, but I think closer to chink. The redskin usage is uncommon enough today that it doesn't seem at all to rise to the level of the n-word*, but I think its history is more bleak than recently memory has it. Having not done any reading on it beyond this topic, probably makes me unqualified to judge a comparison between the two.

    If they approached the tribes, I wonder if any of them would take them up on some kind of offer. The Seminoles were mentioned earlier, but redskin is general enough I am not sure any tribe would want to touch it.


    * At some point I will be adult enough to simply type n-word out correctly like I did chink, but something always holds me back. I think I fear Richard Pryor (or maybe Michael Richards) yelling at me from the stage.


    This nails it in bold.


    Richard was awesome, was it him who said in one of his jokes he and Michael Jackson were forming the ignited negro college fund?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •