Results 1 to 20 of 798

Thread: Official 2024 NFL Draft Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Wolf Pack Rat HOFer Deputy Nutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In Skin's basket
    Posts
    11,174
    I have put about a 45 minutes into watching film on this year's linebacker class, and I think in any other year none of these guys would be more than a 3rd pick. Maybe what my expectations are bullshit.

  2. #2
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
    I have put about a 45 minutes into watching film on this year's linebacker class, and I think in any other year none of these guys would be more than a 3rd pick. Maybe what my expectations are bullshit.
    May be also true at safety.

    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    May be also true at safety.

    yikes

    so theres no way we draft that guy

  4. #4
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,713
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    yikes

    so theres no way we draft that guy
    He's coming off meniscus surgery. I wonder if he tried to work out too early.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  5. #5
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    20,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    He's coming off meniscus surgery. I wonder if he tried to work out too early.
    If that is the case, someone will get a steal if he drops to the third round. If it's not true, then that RAS is some serious suckage, right there. Not too far from my negative 4.23.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    yikes

    so theres no way we draft that guy
    Wow... yeah. That's... not good. Gute doesn't keep many sub 5 RAS guys on the roster, and he's not going to draft one high. You'd hope that he's not fully recovered from the knee surgery.

    Nutz - you're not wrong about the LBs. Even the highly touted ones have some pretty meh or even bad moments if you watch the full game vs. a highlight video.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
    I have put about a 45 minutes into watching film on this year's linebacker class, and I think in any other year none of these guys would be more than a 3rd pick. Maybe what my expectations are bullshit.
    2024 is a bad year to go into the draft needing LB, because if you have to draft one this year, you're spending more than you would other years. The guy you draft in the 3rd may be a guy you'd have gotten in the 4th or even 5th the year before or after, but if you have a hole that needs filling, you bite the bullet and spend it. I'm still hoping we find something useful in free agency.

  8. #8
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    20,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Tundra View Post
    2024 is a bad year to go into the draft needing LB, because if you have to draft one this year, you're spending more than you would other years. The guy you draft in the 3rd may be a guy you'd have gotten in the 4th or even 5th the year before or after, but if you have a hole that needs filling, you bite the bullet and spend it. I'm still hoping we find something useful in free agency.
    I tried this argument on a date once, and got punched in the face.

    Maybe Guter will draft three safeties and three linebackers in rounds four through seven, and see how they shake out.

    I did see they brought in a defensive lineman from OSU for a visit. I'm not against that - but in Hafley's defense, are there most often only two defensive linemen on the field at one time (not counting the EDGE guys who line up as DE's)?

    If so - and I don't know enough to know - then they've already got Clark, Slaton, Brooks, and Wooden for two spots. Is that right?
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
    I tried this argument on a date once, and got punched in the face.

    Maybe Guter will draft three safeties and three linebackers in rounds four through seven, and see how they shake out.

    I did see they brought in a defensive lineman from OSU for a visit. I'm not against that - but in Hafley's defense, are there most often only two defensive linemen on the field at one time (not counting the EDGE guys who line up as DE's)?

    If so - and I don't know enough to know - then they've already got Clark, Slaton, Brooks, and Wooden for two spots. Is that right?
    wyatt?

    yeah, we have no need to draft a fatty for defense this year

    i also think we're gonna be trading up this year. we have too many picks. maybe package the 2 second rounders to get another pick in the first

    or trade one of the seconds for a first next year, if someone falls that someone else really wants.

    kinda looks like this year doesn't offer a whole lot of quality players at positions we need. bad year to have so many picks

  10. #10
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,637
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    wyatt?

    yeah, we have no need to draft a fatty for defense this year

    i also think we're gonna be trading up this year. we have too many picks. maybe package the 2 second rounders to get another pick in the first

    or trade one of the seconds for a first next year, if someone falls that someone else really wants.

    kinda looks like this year doesn't offer a whole lot of quality players at positions we need. bad year to have so many picks
    I disagree. This draft is so fat at OL that we could easily find value with all 3 of our top picks at OL alone. And lets be honest. We could replace 2 starters on the OL and improve them quite easily. We also could use some interior depth.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    I disagree. This draft is so fat at OL that we could easily find value with all 3 of our top picks at OL alone. And lets be honest. We could replace 2 starters on the OL and improve them quite easily. We also could use some interior depth.
    i thought about that, but we are so damn good at finding O-line in the mid to later rounds

    imo, and its based on nothing, we have a better chance at finding a starter for the O-line in the mid rounds then we do any other position

  12. #12
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,637
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    i thought about that, but we are so damn good at finding O-line in the mid to later rounds

    imo, and its based on nothing, we have a better chance at finding a starter for the O-line in the mid rounds then we do any other position
    Not nothing, you are basing it on Gutes past several drafts. Its valid, but when you get a chance to turn your OL into the best in the NFL with 2 good picks and it also happens to be where the value is, you shouldn't pass on it because you might find some quality in round 5.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  13. #13
    what exactly do we need at LB?

    i'm guessing quay is still the MLB, is that still a sideline to sideline enforcer type like urlacher? or is it something different? or does he play one of the other two spots like WLB?

    are weakside and strongside still a thing like they were when we last ran the 4-3? weakside = playmaker, strongside = thumper

    or is that not a thing anymore,

    what would the safety/LB hybrid play? is that the MLB?

    what kind of player exactly do we need for those 2 spots?

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    what exactly do we need at LB?

    i'm guessing quay is still the MLB, is that still a sideline to sideline enforcer type like urlacher? or is it something different? or does he play one of the other two spots like WLB?

    are weakside and strongside still a thing like they were when we last ran the 4-3? weakside = playmaker, strongside = thumper

    or is that not a thing anymore,

    what would the safety/LB hybrid play? is that the MLB?

    what kind of player exactly do we need for those 2 spots?
    Hard to say for sure because we haven't seen his defense yet, but most people seem to think he's looking for LBs along the lines of San Francisco's group - think Warner, Greenlaw, and Al-Shaair before he left. And he's stated that he prizes Quay highly. So fast, aggressive, hard-hitting LBs, with a mix of coverage skills and run-stopping ability.

    Pretty much the universal model for the ideal linebacker; I guess the "type" he wants is "best possible all-around LB he can get".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •