Tolzien is not a better athlete than Flynn, they are both average. I see Flynn winning the backup job unless an injury occurs.
Tolzien is not a better athlete than Flynn, they are both average. I see Flynn winning the backup job unless an injury occurs.
I agree, but then the question is, do you even bother to keep a third QB like Tolzien (or anyone else)? Someone on the PS, sure, but do you waste a spot on the 53 man roster for a guy you don't ever even want to have active on game days, let alone play? I think not.Originally Posted by Brandon494
Flynn could and should be the current Doug Pederson; content backing up Rodgers, making a million or so a year, for the next 5 or 6 years until the Packers begin looking for Rodgers successor. Flynn is not going to have a career as a starter, but he can have a long career as a backup in GB, if he wants it.
Maybe so but do you agree Scott has the better arm?
Stronger arm yes, but less accurate so far, and he's kind of a statue. I'd take Flynn 10/10 times over Tolzien right now. Heady player who doesn't make many mistakes and produces when given a shot. Neither of them is going to win you a superbowl though.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote