Results 1 to 20 of 101

Thread: Studs & Duds - Packers vs. Seahawks

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I second ND72's nomination of Vogel. He was backed up a couple of times and hit no duds. He allowed 1 return of 5 punts, though there was one other moon shot he hit that could have been returned.

    Kid looks good so far. 42 Net is great is they have less than 20 returns for the season.

    Fackrell was active, more than he was in preseason. Still not a force at getting quick pressure, he has a nose for the ball and being in position. Would have loved to see more of Brooks.

    Murphy held up better than I expected. And he seemed to get better.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    I second ND72's nomination of Vogel. He was backed up a couple of times and hit no duds. He allowed 1 return of 5 punts, though there was one other moon shot he hit that could have been returned.

    Kid looks good so far. 42 Net is great is they have less than 20 returns for the season.

    Fackrell was active, more than he was in preseason. Still not a force at getting quick pressure, he has a nose for the ball and being in position. Would have loved to see more of Brooks.

    Murphy held up better than I expected. And he seemed to get better.
    All true - Vogel was excellent. Murphy wasn't hopeless going against an excellent D Line. And Fackrell did his job in the scheme - about all you can ask of a back up.

    I never even saw Brooks hit the field, and I was surprised to see it written on the screen that he got the concussion.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •