RashanGary
05-19-2006, 11:05 PM
Chicago 11-5
Greenbay 9-7
Detroit 6-10
Minnesota 6-10 *No playmakers. NONE*
I think Chicago has a firm grasp of the North. They are tough and are playing another year with the same crew in the same schemes. Plus, they just got a taste of the playoffs and should be hungry.
Greenbay is going to be deceptively good. I hear the over/under is 6.5 on GB's wins. I'm going to drop a hundo or two on the over. Needless to say, I think they are much improved. Hawk, Woodson are two playmakers that where not on the team a year ago. That = 2-3 wins right there IMO.
Detroit and Minnesta will duke it out for the honor of cellar dwellar. They have no play makers. I guess becasue of QB play, I have to give MINN the edge but it's not by much. At least DET has a couple play makers in Rodgers and Roy Williams. Damn.....Who is better? They both suck. LOL it feels good to say that. I hate the Vikings.
Greenbay 9-7
Detroit 6-10
Minnesota 6-10 *No playmakers. NONE*
I think Chicago has a firm grasp of the North. They are tough and are playing another year with the same crew in the same schemes. Plus, they just got a taste of the playoffs and should be hungry.
Greenbay is going to be deceptively good. I hear the over/under is 6.5 on GB's wins. I'm going to drop a hundo or two on the over. Needless to say, I think they are much improved. Hawk, Woodson are two playmakers that where not on the team a year ago. That = 2-3 wins right there IMO.
Detroit and Minnesta will duke it out for the honor of cellar dwellar. They have no play makers. I guess becasue of QB play, I have to give MINN the edge but it's not by much. At least DET has a couple play makers in Rodgers and Roy Williams. Damn.....Who is better? They both suck. LOL it feels good to say that. I hate the Vikings.