PDA

View Full Version : How is the NFC North going to play out?*an early prediction*



RashanGary
05-19-2006, 11:05 PM
Chicago 11-5
Greenbay 9-7
Detroit 6-10
Minnesota 6-10 *No playmakers. NONE*

I think Chicago has a firm grasp of the North. They are tough and are playing another year with the same crew in the same schemes. Plus, they just got a taste of the playoffs and should be hungry.

Greenbay is going to be deceptively good. I hear the over/under is 6.5 on GB's wins. I'm going to drop a hundo or two on the over. Needless to say, I think they are much improved. Hawk, Woodson are two playmakers that where not on the team a year ago. That = 2-3 wins right there IMO.

Detroit and Minnesta will duke it out for the honor of cellar dwellar. They have no play makers. I guess becasue of QB play, I have to give MINN the edge but it's not by much. At least DET has a couple play makers in Rodgers and Roy Williams. Damn.....Who is better? They both suck. LOL it feels good to say that. I hate the Vikings.

HarveyWallbangers
05-19-2006, 11:20 PM
Chicago is the clear favorite. Minnesota, Green Bay, and Detroit will fight it out for second. 8 wins could finish second in the division.

Deputy Nutz
05-19-2006, 11:21 PM
Well, Chicago's offense is pretty god awful. The Packers, Lions, and Vikings all have experienced coaching changes, and are in a rebuilding mode.

Chicago, 9-7

Green Bay, 8-8

Vikings, 7-9

Detroit, 5-11

RashanGary
05-19-2006, 11:41 PM
Nutz,

You think putting $100 on the over of 6.5 wins for GB is a good bet? I just want to get a few opinions.

Deputy Nutz
05-19-2006, 11:51 PM
Sure. I would be really suprised if this team doesn't win 8 games. the defense seems to good to allow anything less.

Hopefully this team can stay healthy, something they weren't able to do under Sherman.

RashanGary
05-19-2006, 11:56 PM
Woodson, Hawk are two playmakers that weren't there a year ago. Not only that but they both take the place of the 2 weakest defenders. I think it's a safe bet. WTF It'll be fun either way.

Bretsky
05-19-2006, 11:57 PM
Nutz,

You think putting $100 on the over of 6.5 wins for GB is a good bet? I just want to get a few opinions.

I think 6 wins is their floor and 9 wins is their season. So I think odds are on your side

RashanGary
05-20-2006, 12:31 AM
Thanks B...

I'm thinkin it looks like a good bet too. I'm gonna do it. Like I said, it's gonna be fun either way. Wathcing them lose will such in a way, but it will be a laugh looking back even if they lose. It's not like I'm betting my car or anything. Plus, I think it's a safe bet.

MadtownPacker
05-20-2006, 12:42 AM
Sorry but all you bear fearing crevices need to realize the bears are gonna get served week 1.

Packers 9-7
queens 7-9
bears 7-9
lions 5-11

RashanGary
05-20-2006, 12:51 AM
I'm on bettingexpress.com

The bet is pretty interesting.

If the Packers win 6 or more games I win $100 Dollars.

That is pretty safe. The problem is; If they only win 5 or less, I lose 170.

I still think it is a really good bet. I do not see them going below 6 wins.

If Favre gets injured, that ruins my bet.

Tarlam!
05-20-2006, 02:33 AM
O.K. Go file this and hold me to it:

Pack 11 wins.
Minne 9 wins
Chicago 7 wins
Detroit 5 wins.

After winning 4 of the NFC North, we win against the Aints, Fins, Sheep, Cards, Bills, Jets, Niners.

Here's how it will look:

0-1
1-1
2-1
2-2
3-2
Bye
4-2
5-2
6-2
6-3
6-4
6-5
7-5
8-5
9-5
10-5
11-5

YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST!