PDA

View Full Version : 2005 Depth Chart by Postions



Tarlam!
05-20-2006, 06:23 AM
Since we are alre4ady starting to allocate who might make the 53 man circus, I thought I'd go back to 2005 and see how our roster was made up. I know the post is long (pagewise), but maybe you want to cut and paste the positional list and start adding names...

Postion
..........Running Total.
(Number at Position)

Offense

QB..........1.
(3)..........2.
..............3.

HB..........4.
(3)..........5.
..............6.

FB..........7.
(2).........8.

WR.........9.
(5).........10.
.............11.
.............12.
.............13.

TE..........14.
(3).........15.
.............16.

C...........17.
(2).........18.

OT.........19.
(4).........20.
.............21.
.............22.

G...........23.
(4).........24.
.............25.
.............26.

Defense

DE.........27.
(5)........28.
............29.
............30.
............31.

DT........32.
(4)........33.
............34.
............35.

SLB.......36.
(2)........37.

MLB.......38.
(2)........39.

WLB......40.
(2)........41.

CB.........42.
(5).........43.
.............44.
.............45.
.............46.

FS..........47.
(2).........48.

SS..........49.
(2).........50.

Specialists

Punter.....51.
Kicker......52.
LS...........53.

gbpackfan
05-20-2006, 07:46 AM
MM was talking about keeping 6 WR last minicamp. I agree with him.

BlueBrewer
05-20-2006, 08:04 AM
I also agree with 6 WR, the amount of talent that we have for the price it would be foolish to downsize.

Noodle
05-20-2006, 11:11 AM
Keep 6 WRs on the 53 roster, keep only two QBs or one FB.

HarveyWallbangers
05-20-2006, 11:26 AM
There's a good chance they keep 6 wideouts, and they can do it by carrying 9 OL--which is normally what they do.

Clifton, Colledge, Wells, Coston, Tauscher, Barry, Spitz, White are solid bets. The last roster spot will come down to Klemm, Whitticker, Moll, Lucier, etc. I'm betting they keep Klemm because he provides them with security. He's been a decent LT in the past, and i think he's about the only backup on the roster who would be okay as a starter at that crucial spot. Whitticker is not a good fit for this scheme. Moll is practice squad material. The rest are just bodies.

Tarlam!
05-20-2006, 11:56 AM
QB..........1. Favre
(3)..........2. A-Rod
..............3. Ingelbert

HB..........4. Gado
(3)..........5. Green
..............6. Herron NOT DAVENPORT

FB..........7. Hendo
(2).........8. Ben Brown Leach just aint that great

WR.........9. DD Fergie traded
(6).........10. Gardner
.............11. Boerigter
.............12. Jennings
.............13. Rogers
…ââ ¡Ã‚¬Ã‚¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦Ã ¢â‚¬Â¦Ã¢â‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¦.14. Lucas

TE.........15. Bubba
(3)..........16. Lee
…ââ ¡Ã‚¬Ã‚¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦...1 7. Cross Think A-Rod, think future, think "missed opportunities"

C.........18. Wells
(2)........19. White


OT.........20. Chad
(4)..........21. Taush
.............22. Klemm
............23. Moll

G.........24. Colledge
(4)..........25. Spitz Yes, two Rooks will start
.............26. Coston
…ââ ¡Ã‚¬Ã‚¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦.27. Lucier Plays 2 positions, versatile. Cuts include Whit, Barry.

Defense

DE........28. Kampy
(4)............29. KGB
............30. Montgomery
............31. Tollefson Cut: Peterson

DT........32. Picket
(4)........33. Allen
............34. Jenkins Plays 2 positions, versatile.
............35. Jolly Cuts, Corey Williams, Washington.

SLB.......36. Taylor
(2)........37. Poppy

MLB.......38. Hodge
(2)........39. Barnett

WLB......40. Hawk
(2)........41. Manning

CB.........42. Woodson
(5).........43. Harris
.............44. Carroll
.............45. Hawkins
.............46. Blackmon

FS..........47. Marquand
(2).........48. Culver Roman goes….

SS..........49. Collins
(2).........50. Marviel Thornburg is a demon. He may pull this one outta the bag!

HarveyWallbangers
05-20-2006, 01:18 PM
Offense

QB..........1. Favre
(3)..........2. Rodgers
..............3. Martin

HB..........4. Green
(3)..........5. Gado
..............6. Davenport

FB..........7. Henderson
(2).........8. Leach

WR.........9. Driver
(6).........10. Gardner
.............11. Ferguson
.............12. Jennings
.............13. Boerigter
.............14. Rodgers

TE..........15. Franks
(3).........16. Lee
.............17. Martin

C...........18. Wells
(2).........19. White

OT.........20. Clifton
(4).........21. Tauscher
.............22. Klemm
.............23. Barry

G...........24. Colledge
(3).........25. Coston
.............26. Spitz

Defense

DE.........27. Kampman
(4)........28. Gbaja-Biamila
............29. Montgomery
............30. Peterson

DT........31. Pickett
(5)........32. Williams
............33. Cole
............34. Jenkins
............35. Allen

SLB.......36. Taylor
(2)........37. Poppinga

MLB.......38. Barnett
(2)........39. Hodge

WLB......40. Hawk
(2)........41. Manning

CB.........42. Harris
(5).........43. Woodson
.............44. Carroll
.............45. Hawkins
.............46. Blackmon

FS..........47. Manuel
(2).........48. Roman

SS..........49. Collins
(2).........50. Culver

Specialists

Punter.....51. Ryan
Kicker......52. Cundiff
LS...........53. Davis

Tarlam!
05-20-2006, 01:22 PM
Not much between our rosters harv. Leach, Roman, and the TE are most likely right in your roster. I think Fergie has had it...

HarveyWallbangers
05-20-2006, 01:31 PM
There will be a couple of surprises. There always is. I don't think I've ever pegged the full roster this early.

Guys that could get beat out, and who could beat them out.

WR
Gardner (if his atttitude isn't right)
Ferguson (they may decide to dump him for a younger player)
Boerigter (see Ferguson)
Rodgers (he just may not be that good, and somebody else could beat him out as a returner)

RB
Green (injuries)
Davenport (injuries)

FB
Leach (new regime)

TE
Martin (depends what his attitude is like)

OT
Klemm (if a younger player steps up, they may choose to save money here)

OC
White (all of his potential is just hearsay at this point)

DE
Peterson (I think he's probably safe)

DT
Allen (just a wild guess for this spot)

LB
Manning (could be beat out by somebody like Campbell)

CB
Carroll (longshot, but if he doesn't show improvement, he could be gone)

S
Roman (if Underwood, Culver, and/or somebody else shows potential)

ST
None of the specialists are guaranteed a starting gig.

Harlan Huckleby
05-20-2006, 06:24 PM
I think Green or Underwood could be surprise cuts.

mraynrand
05-20-2006, 08:34 PM
I just hope Roman isn't on the final roster. It's not that I think there's a guy right now that is better, but if someone doesn't emerge to pass him, that's a weak link right at the starting gate.