PDA

View Full Version : Better QB : Don Majikowsi or Aaron Rodgers?



motife
03-10-2008, 03:50 PM
back to square 1. Imagine the last 16 years were just a dream.

Would we be better off with Infante's healthy Majik Man or McCarthy's Rodgers?

BallHawk
03-10-2008, 04:03 PM
A-Rod would be my pick.

But if A-Rod could put up numbers resembling Don's 1989 season I would be pretty happy.

SkinBasket
03-10-2008, 04:07 PM
There's a reason Don's career didn't rebound in Indy or Detroit. He wasn't really that good or durable, but he had a special year, including the win over the Bears, a funny name, and a desperate fan base.

twoseven
03-10-2008, 04:24 PM
Majik was drafted in the tenth round, obvioulsy AR in the first, so I would EXPECT a lot more out of AR.

What team are they QBing..AR's 08' lineup -OR- Majik's 1988 4 win squad, 3rd from last in the league in total yardage, with Brent Fullwood rushing for 483 yards, and Sharpe (55 rec, 791 yards, 1 TD) and Perry Kemp (48, 620, 0) as his wideouts?

The Shadow
03-10-2008, 06:22 PM
Um..... Rodgers hasn't really played yet.
How on Earth can you compare the two?

BlueBrewer
03-10-2008, 08:10 PM
I know we are all bored but you are really reaching here. That said I pick rodgers.

red
03-10-2008, 08:28 PM
Um..... Rodgers hasn't really played yet.
How on Earth can you compare the two?

right on shadow

Scott Campbell
03-10-2008, 08:36 PM
Majik had a better mullet.

The Shadow
03-10-2008, 08:39 PM
Who is better?
The future Packet QB now in high school or the guy in junior high?

MJZiggy
03-10-2008, 08:45 PM
Majik had a better mullet.

Rodgers does a better Jesus imitation.

b bulldog
03-10-2008, 08:49 PM
Majik was a pretty good QB until injuries derailed his career.

Joemailman
03-10-2008, 09:38 PM
This thread is is asking who we would pick in 1992. Keep in mind that in 1990 and 1991 combined, Majik had 13 TD passes and 20 INT's. Majik was a 1-year wonder. I'd take Rodgers who I think has a better arm and is probably smarter.

Freak Out
03-10-2008, 09:48 PM
Um..... Rodgers hasn't really played yet.
How on Earth can you compare the two?

As seems to be the trend here......QFT. (Ugh..)

Lets ask this question in a year or two.

Jimx29
03-10-2008, 10:47 PM
Um..... Rodgers hasn't really played yet.
How on Earth can you compare the two?Just like all the NFL beat writers do....speculate, speculate, speculate and sooner or later people will take your speculations as truths



I speculate that Rodgers would be the better of the two, but the majic man has one of the best pics i've ever snagged

http://i31.tinypic.com/9glvm8.gif

Bretsky
03-10-2008, 11:05 PM
This thread is is asking who we would pick in 1992. Keep in mind that in 1990 and 1991 combined, Majik had 13 TD passes and 20 INT's. Majik was a 1-year wonder. I'd take Rodgers who I think has a better arm and is probably smarter.

A one year wonder or somebody who was learning how to play the position for Green Bay ? I'm not sure which it was. He was never the same after the injury; and that was a good thing

Carolina_Packer
03-11-2008, 08:06 AM
I would have preferred 'Too Early to Tell' as a poll choice. I hope Rodgers is the answer and that he's better than Don, but we shall see.

MadtownPacker
03-11-2008, 08:56 AM
Arod has to at least win 1 game before he can even be compared to tavaris jackson so NO, ARod is not better then Majikowski (who I never saw play).

AtlPackFan
03-11-2008, 12:16 PM
Ask me again in a few years