PDA

View Full Version : Its election time and Fox is up to their usual stellar job



Tyrone Bigguns
06-13-2008, 09:16 AM
Fox News refers to Michelle Obama as `baby mama'
By DAVID BAUDER,AP
Posted: 2008-06-13 07:34:08

NEW YORK (AP) - Fox News Channel referred to Michelle Obama as "Obama's baby mama" in a graphic on Wednesday, the latest in a trio of references to the Democratic presidential campaign that have given fuel to network critics.

The graphic "Outraged liberals: Stop picking on Obama's baby mama" was flashed during an interview with conservative columnist Michelle Malkin about whether Barack Obama's wife has been the target of unfair criticism.

In the past two weeks, Fox anchor E.D. Hill has apologized for referring to an affectionate onstage fist bump shared by the couple as a "terrorist fist jab," and Fox contributor Liz Trotta said she was sorry for joking about an Obama assassination.

The incidents are further indications of how closely the endless cable campaign chatter is being watched this year. Hillary Clinton's campaign was angered by what it described as the pro-Obama tilt of some MSNBC commentators. Amid protests, MSNBC's Chris Matthews said he was wrong this winter to say Clinton was a candidate because "her husband messed around." And MSNBC reporter David Shuster was suspended for two weeks for saying Clinton's campaign had "pimped out" daughter Chelsea by having her make political phone calls.

"Obama's baby mama" was never said on the air. Malkin said during her interview that she had seen no gratuitous or cheap shots taken against Michelle Obama by Republican or conservative critics.

Joan Walsh, a columnist from Salon.com, criticized the graphic on Thursday as a slur.

"Do you try to explain that `baby mama' is slang for the unmarried mother of a man's child, and not his wife, or even a girlfriend?" Walsh wrote. "Are they racist, or just clueless? Isn't there racism even in their cluelessness, if somebody didn't know what `baby mama' means, but used it anyway? Even at Fox, won't somebody have to apologize?"

"Baby Mama" also was the title of a recent movie about a woman who hired a surrogate to bear a child. It starred Tina Fey and Amy Poehler, both of whom are white.

Bill Shine, senior vice president of programming at Fox, said in a statement that a producer "exercised poor judgment" during the segment. The producer was not fired; no other disciplinary action was announced.

Hill's "terrorist fist jab" comment came in a tease to a segment on the candidates' body language, and it wasn't repeated during the subsequent interview. She told Fox it was taken from something she had read online.

No matter: "terrorist fist jab" quickly became an online sensation.

Hill apologized on-air four days after she said it. Hill said some people "thought I had personally characterized it inappropriately. I regret that. It was not my intention and I certainly did not mean to associate the word `terrorist' in any way with Sen. Obama and his wife."

Fox subsequently canceled Hill's weekday afternoon program as part of a larger reorganization. She remains on staff.

Trotta's assassination joke came May 25 as she commented about how some considered it distasteful for Clinton to refer to Robert F. Kennedy's assassination when explaining why she was staying in the presidential race.

"Now we have what some are reading as a suggestion that somebody knock off Osama," she said, quickly correcting herself. "Obama. Well, both if we could."

Obama's name has often been confused with terrorist leader Osama bin Laden's, by people ranging from Mitt Romney to CNN's Alina Cho. And MSNBC once flashed a picture of bin Laden as Chris Matthews talked about Obama.

Trotta apologized on-air the next day, and hasn't appeared on Fox since.

"I sincerely regret it and apologize to anybody I've offended," she said. "It's a very colorful political season and many of us are making mistakes and saying things that we wish we hadn't said."

sheepshead
06-13-2008, 11:40 AM
Don't worry, we wont have to resort to name calling to defeat the most flawed, inexperienced, radical empty suit to be nominated by his party in history.

Tyrone Bigguns
06-13-2008, 11:49 AM
Don't worry, we wont have to resort to name calling to defeat the most flawed, inexperienced, radical empty suit to be nominated by his party in history.

Funny, you already have.

That sentence could have been written about Bush.

retailguy
06-13-2008, 11:59 AM
[quote="Tyrone Bigguns
That sentence could have been written about Bush.[/quote]

And it has, many times. On that basis, shouldn't you quit complaining?

All the inaccurate spin directed at Bush can't be duplicated in this campaign, there simply isn't enough time.

Obama, on the whole, is being treated much more fairly than I expected. Wait until the mainstream media (fox included) start going after McCain... That lovefest is now OVER, since he's won the nomination.

Tyrone Bigguns
06-13-2008, 12:06 PM
[quote="Tyrone Bigguns
That sentence could have been written about Bush.

And it has, many times. On that basis, shouldn't you quit complaining?

All the inaccurate spin directed at Bush can't be duplicated in this campaign, there simply isn't enough time.

Obama, on the whole, is being treated much more fairly than I expected. Wait until the mainstream media (fox included) start going after McCain... That lovefest is now OVER, since he's won the nomination.[/quote]

Relax, the next 8 years wont' hurt that badly. :twisted:

BTW, who is Coulter gonna vote for..now that hillary is done?

Partial
06-13-2008, 12:16 PM
Tex's thread speaks for itself. Bush's presidency was great when he was able to get things done by having a republican congress. Now that the dems are in control note everything going down the tubes.

LL2
06-13-2008, 12:21 PM
Nothing has been done since Newt Gingrich was Speaker of the House. Pelosi is a joke!

texaspackerbacker
06-13-2008, 12:36 PM
Basically, the only real negative in the country is the high oil /gas price situation. The rotten leftist majority in Congress has hamstrung Bush from taking steps that would have relieved that--refineries, drilling domestic sources, increased use of nuclear power, etc. It's NOT some coincidence; It's Congress preventing effective action because bad times--fuel or otherwise--increase their chances of getting back the presidency.

Based on that, one might conclude that if Obama gets in, it will then serve the purpose of Dems in Congress to improve the situation. The trouble with that logic, however, is that the stupid leftist policies pushed by most Dems will do more harm than the obstruction of good solutions now.

bobblehead
06-13-2008, 12:50 PM
Nothing has been done since Newt Gingrich was Speaker of the House. Pelosi is a joke!

AMEN BROTHER, a post after my own heart.

bobblehead
06-13-2008, 12:51 PM
Basically, the only real negative in the country is the high oil /gas price situation. The rotten leftist majority in Congress has hamstrung Bush from taking steps that would have relieved that--refineries, drilling domestic sources, increased use of nuclear power, etc. It's NOT some coincidence; It's Congress preventing effective action because bad times--fuel or otherwise--increase their chances of getting back the presidency.

Based on that, one might conclude that if Obama gets in, it will then serve the purpose of Dems in Congress to improve the situation. The trouble with that logic, however, is that the stupid leftist policies pushed by most Dems will do more harm than the obstruction of good solutions now.

I hope you are including the shit sucking republicans that sided with the left in defeating those measures. They did have a majority for 6 years and I still don't see any oil flowing....leftists pricks can reside on the right as well.

Freak Out
06-13-2008, 01:01 PM
Look ma no hands! But I see some strings.....?

sheepshead
06-13-2008, 01:03 PM
Don't worry, we wont have to resort to name calling to defeat the most flawed, inexperienced, radical empty suit to be nominated by his party in history.

Funny, you already have.

That sentence could have been written about Bush.

Okay wait..the only comeback you have is "I know you are but what am I" ?

Besides, last time I checked Bush isn't running.

texaspackerbacker
06-13-2008, 01:06 PM
That's true, Bobblehead. There are some very squishy Republicans, especially on "environmental" issues. Blame the God damned leftist mainstream media for that, more than anything else. These guys correctly in many states, think they have to follow the bogus liberal crap put out about environmental issues to get elected.

The necessity of 60 votes for cloture of filibusters in the Senate is a bigger factor, though.

hoosier
06-13-2008, 01:13 PM
Tex's thread speaks for itself. Bush's presidency was great when he was able to get things done by having a republican congress. Now that the dems are in control note everything going down the tubes.

Stick to what you know, which in your case seems to be sweeping shit out of the basement. :P

texaspackerbacker
06-13-2008, 01:25 PM
Tex's thread speaks for itself. Bush's presidency was great when he was able to get things done by having a republican congress. Now that the dems are in control note everything going down the tubes.

Stick to what you know, which in your case seems to be sweeping shit out of the basement. :P

Hoosier, he represents the great apolitical center in this country--which when exposed to a rare bit of truth and normalcy, instinctively recognizes it as truth and normalcy--and in tune with what they were thinking before the leftist mainstream media drenched them with more shit than a sewage flooded basement.

That is why, just like 2000 and 2004, when we get closer to the election and ads and debates start to mean more than media spin, the electorate generally comes around to the point of view of truth and normalcy--and rejects the left wing extremists--Gore, Kerry, and now Obama.