PDA

View Full Version : Power Rankings



Charles Woodson
07-21-2008, 11:42 AM
2008 Power Rankings: Offseason
RK (LW) TEAM REC COMMENT
1 (1) Patriots 16-0-0 The Patriots may have major question marks at CB. But with the NFL's easiest schedule, that shouldn't matter. The key is staying healthy. (JC)
2 (2) Colts 13-3-0 The Colts head to camp with health concerns about Marvin Harrison and Dwight Freeney, but won a lot of games without them in 2007. (PK)
3 (3) Chargers 11-5-0 The Chargers have to make sure the injuries don't mount because this team enters training camp smelling its first Super Bowl visit in 14 seasons. (BW)
4 (4) Cowboys 13-3-0 QB Tony Romo knows the only way he can validate his immense talent is to win a playoff game. With this team, he'll finally break through. (MM)
5 (5) Jaguars 11-5-0 The Jags' draft concentrated on pass-rushers who can give Peyton Manning and Tom Brady a harder time. (PK)
6 (6) Giants 10-6-0 New York didn't have to wait until training camp for the Super Bowl hangover to start. Losing four key players on defense won't help, and Jeremy Shockey's not the type of person to put his ego aside to help the team. (MM)
7 (7) Steelers 10-6-0 Ben Roethlisberger looked awfully good this spring. He might be primed to join the elite QB class of Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. (JW)
8 (10) Packers 13-3-0 Yes, they've had some unexpected drama this summer. With or without Brett Favre, however, the Packers have assembled a deep and talented roster that is built for the long haul. (KS)
9 (8) Seahawks 10-6-0 Coach Mike Holmgren is looking for the defense to toughen up on the road, which could be key as the offense works its way through personnel changes. (MS)
10 (9) Browns 10-6-0 Recent injury setbacks for WR Joe Jurevicius (knee), OG Ryan Tucker (hip) and CB Daven Holly (knee) have hit this team hard. But the Browns are deep. (JW)
11 (12) Vikings 8-8-0 The Vikings hit a couple of offseason home runs, signing WR Bernard Berrian and trading for DE Jared Allen. Their arrivals, plus the development of QB Tarvaris Jackson, should be enough to get to the playoffs. (KS)
12 (11) Saints 7-9-0 LB Jon Vilma and rookie DT Sedrick Ellis should make the defense significantly better. The offense already had plenty of talent. (PY)
13 (13) Eagles 8-8-0 This is the wild-card factor. With a healthy Donovan McNabb and and an improved defense, the Eagles could get back to winning NFC East titles. Keep your eyes on speedy rookie DeSean Jackson. (MM)
14 (16) Titans 10-6-0 The Titans will rely on offensive coordinator Mike Heimerdinger to jump-start the pass offense, while the run game and defense remain the backbone. (PK)
15 (15) Buccaneers 9-7-0 The defense always will keep the Bucs close. If Warrick Dunn, Earnest Graham or a healthy Cadillac Williams can provide a consistent ground threat, this team is in the playoffs. (PY)
16 (14) Redskins 9-7-0 We're about to find out whether Jason Campbell is the answer at QB. Head coach Jim Zorn was hired to help Campbell, and so far, the two are getting rave reviews. (MM)
17 (17) Cardinals 8-8-0 Edgerrin James turns 30 next month, but he's confident superior conditioning will help him avoid injuries that strike older running backs. (MS)
18 (19) Bills 7-9-0 Dick Jauron has the Bills poised to be a surprise playoff challenger. Trent Edwards had a great offseason working with the offensive changes implemented by new coordinator Turk Schonert. (JC)
19 (20) Texans 8-8-0 Houston could improve and not have its record show it because of competition in the AFC South. (PK)
20 (18) Panthers 7-9-0 Coach John Fox is betting his future that QB Jake Delhomme can make a full recovery from Tommy John surgery. Rookie RB Jonathan Stewart will have to make an immediate impact. (PY)
21 (22) Ravens 5-11-0 Choosing the right QB this summer could be the difference between a winning and losing season. (JW)
22 (23) Broncos 7-9-0 If Jay Cutler can stay healthy and Brandon Marshall can stay out of trouble, this offense will be fun to watch. (BW)
23 (21) Jets 4-12-0 Eric Mangini plans to go heavy on the run this year, but will there be enough offense to make a playoff run? The big question is at QB. (JC)
24 (25) Bengals 7-9-0 If new coordinator Mike Zimmer can rally the defense quickly, the Bengals could surprise. (JW)
25 (24) Bears 7-9-0 The Bears are hoping Kyle Orton or Rex Grossman will emerge as a viable quarterback, but their histories suggest otherwise. It's a big risk to take. As with the Lions, the defense will have to take control. (KS)
26 (28) Rams 3-13-0 Getting LT Orlando Pace healthy -- and keeping him that way -- must rank as the Rams' top priority heading into training camp and the season. (MS)
27 (26) Raiders 4-12-0 Optimism is sky high in Oakland. It might not be warranted, but the Raiders will be more fun to watch than in recent years. (BW)
28 (27) 49ers 5-11-0 The 49ers have not yet committed to a starting QB, but the season could hinge on whether Alex Smith recovers from a brutal 2007 season. (MS)
29 (29) Lions 7-9-0 Converting from a pass-happy offense to a more balanced attack is a good move for the long haul, but will take some time. This team needs to rely on its defense, which is under development. (KS)
30 (30) Chiefs 4-12-0 This is one of the youngest teams in the NFL. Let the rebuilding phase begin. (BW)
31 (31) Dolphins 1-15-0 Bill Parcells has improved the roster with his type of tough, physical players, but the success of the season will depend on what happens at QB. It's anybody's guess who will start -- John Beck, Chad Henne or Josh McCown. (JC)
32 (32) Falcons 4-12-0 The roster was gutted -- not a bad thing. But it's going to take time to add enough talent to make this team a serious contender. (PY)

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2008&week=0

Fritz
07-21-2008, 01:03 PM
"The Vikings hit a couple of offseason home runs, signing WR Bernard Berrian and trading for DE Jared Allen."

Bernard Berrien = single

Jared Allen = triple

The Leaper
07-21-2008, 01:32 PM
If they hit two home runs, why are they still outside the top ten?

bobblehead
07-21-2008, 01:44 PM
As usual of late the NFC looks weak. I'm sticking with my prediction earlier this offseason that the Chargers go 14-2 and win the superbowl this year.

I think the Titans will surprise also, but ultimately they play in the AFC.

billy_oliver880
07-21-2008, 01:55 PM
"The Vikings hit a couple of offseason home runs, signing WR Bernard Berrian and trading for DE Jared Allen."

Bernard Berrien = single

Jared Allen = triple

Bernard Berrien is a sac bunt at best.

mission
07-21-2008, 04:17 PM
what development of tavaris jackson are they referring to?

sheepshead
07-21-2008, 04:33 PM
what development of tavaris jackson are they referring to?
hope wish and a prayer

Chevelle2
07-21-2008, 04:38 PM
what development of tavaris jackson are they referring to?

puberty

Bretsky
07-21-2008, 04:54 PM
"The Vikings hit a couple of offseason home runs, signing WR Bernard Berrian and trading for DE Jared Allen."

Bernard Berrien = single

Jared Allen = triple


IMO is Berrien had a QB he'd be a double

But T Jackson has the ability to make him a called third strike

3irty1
07-21-2008, 06:08 PM
Berrian's not bad but I feel like he's a poor fit for the WCO. He's not especially good after the catch, not a guy I want running over the middle, and drops too many balls. I you've got to be more than a deep threat to be a legit number 1.

MJZiggy
07-21-2008, 07:02 PM
what development of tavaris jackson are they referring to?

puberty :lol:

RashanGary
07-21-2008, 07:10 PM
Berrian's not bad but I feel like he's a poor fit for the WCO. He's not especially good after the catch, not a guy I want running over the middle, and drops too many balls. I you've got to be more than a deep threat to be a legit number 1.

I've never thought about it, but good point.

Another thing, as much as Grossman is a bad overall QB, he's really not a bad passer at all. He can put the ball anywhere with accuracy, he's just too risky and kills his team that way. I think the "Barrian would be even better if he had a QB" thing is untrue. The Bears would be better if they didn't have a risk taker but the recievers do not suffer because of that. They benefit.

Zool
07-21-2008, 11:18 PM
Berrian's not bad but I feel like he's a poor fit for the WCO. He's not especially good after the catch, not a guy I want running over the middle, and drops too many balls. I you've got to be more than a deep threat to be a legit number 1.

He doesn't really want to run over the middle either.

MadtownPacker
07-22-2008, 01:03 PM
Just an FYI about Berrian. Back in the days at Fresno St going across the middle and loading up on YAC was something he did often. I always felt chicago didnt use him right with rex"chuck'it and say fuck'it" grossman.

Dont you guys remember when he kick your badgers asses at Camp Randall?? :lol:

http://www.packerrats.com/gallery/burned.jpg

boiga
07-22-2008, 03:33 PM
As usual of late the NFC looks weak. I'm sticking with my prediction earlier this offseason that the Chargers go 14-2 and win the superbowl this year.

I think the Titans will surprise also, but ultimately they play in the AFC.

I never did understand this line of thinking. Last year the NFC tied the AFC in interconference regular season games 32-32 and won the tie breaking Super Bowl.

Sure the NFC might have more parity than AFC, but both have just as many lousy teams as quality ones. The supposed talent gap between the conferences is bull.

In regards to the list above, odds are it will be as bunkum as last years preseason power rankings. Considering the authors are guessing out of their rears, that should come as expected.

The Leaper
07-22-2008, 03:38 PM
Sure the NFC might have more parity than AFC, but both have just as many lousy teams as quality ones. The supposed talent gap between the conferences is bull.

I agree.

Sure, the AFC has more high quality teams...it also has more poor quality teams.

On one hand, you've got the Patriots, Colts, Jags and Chargers.

On the other hand, you've got the Raiders, Jets, Dolphins, Chiefs and Ravens.

The NFC doesn't have as many high quality teams, but it also doesn't have nearly as many non-competitive teams.

Guiness
07-22-2008, 03:42 PM
As usual of late the NFC looks weak. I'm sticking with my prediction earlier this offseason that the Chargers go 14-2 and win the superbowl this year.

I think the Titans will surprise also, but ultimately they play in the AFC.

I never did understand this line of thinking. Last year the NFC tied the AFC in interconference regular season games 32-32 and won the tie breaking Super Bowl.

Sure the NFC might have more parity than AFC, but both have just as many lousy teams as quality ones. The supposed talent gap between the conferences is bull.

In regards to the list above, odds are it will be as bunkum as last years preseason power rankings. Considering the authors are guessing out of their rears, that should come as expected.

It's because all the national writers are in love with the Patriots, Colts and Chargers