Predict Rodgers Stats...

[Chevelle2]

Im bored....Ill bump it too.....

250/400
26 touchdowns
14 interceptions
3200 yards

200 rush yards
2 rush touchdowns


94.58 rating.

[PackerTimer]

800 completions
7200 yards
89 touchdowns
550 rushing yards
11 touchdowns
1 interception (of course this happens while he steps in as nickle back. :D

Seriously, my numbers come out almost exactly like yours C2.

[HarveyWallbangers]

http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?t=12534&highlight=rodgers+predict

I'll stick with this:


I'm thinking a good year for Rodgers would be about 62 comp. %, 20-22 TDs, 14-15 interceptions.

[RashanGary]

Im bored....Ill bump it too.....

250/400
26 touchdowns
14 interceptions
3200 yards

200 rush yards
2 rush touchdowns


94.58 rating.

I think this is a good guess.

[RashanGary]

I guess 2 out of every 3 QB's do not finish the season starting every game each year. For Favre to do it 16 times in a row is really amazing.

I hope Rodgers doesn't get injured. I could see him having a big year if he's healthy all season.

[BallHawk]

I'm thinking around a 60% completion percentage, 25 TDs, 13 INTs, 3,000 yards.

[RashanGary]

Hey Ballhawk,

Ruvell looks more cut this year and is having a great camp. I think I'll be eating my words on the "Ruvell is a guy you want to replace" thing.

[Bossman641]

I'll say somewhere around 3500 yards, 23 TD, 14 INT and a 64% completion rate.

Honestly, I'd be happy if he has 20+ TD's and <16 picks.

[BallHawk]

Hey Ballhawk,

Ruvell looks more cut this year and is having a great camp. I think I'll be eating my words on the "Ruvell is a guy you want to replace" thing.

I keep hearing great things about Ruvell. He's in shape, catching everything thrown his way, still has the great attitude.

With A-Rod and him being great friends I see him getting a lot more looks this year.

I dare say, I think when all is said and done after the season he will have been our 3rd most productive WR. I expect numbers similar to James Jones' from last year only with more TDs, maybe around 5.

[Noodle]

You folks have him as a top ten quarterback. No way.

If we're lucky, it'll be like 200 comp., 320 attempts (we're going to run more), 2,500 yards, 15 tds, 10 ints.

It's going to be a tough start, but he'll get better through the season.

[BallHawk]

You folks have him as a top ten quarterback. No way.

If we're lucky, it'll be like 200 comp., 320 attempts (we're going to run more), 2,500 yards, 15 tds, 10 ints.

It's going to be a tough start, but he'll get better through the season.

My stats are based on A-Rod being competent and our WRs being the league's best.

YAC will pad A-Rod's stats heavily, IMO.

[GBRulz]

http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?t=12534&highlight=rodgers+predict
[/quote]

I clicked on that link.... I had to check three times to see some of the posts that JH had on that page. I am convinced someone hacked into his account and posted those things! :shock:

[LEWCWA]

You Rodgers homers don't expect much from you boy do you! Hell he will miss at least 4 games. I'll say 172-312 14 tds 11 ints and a 5-7 record in his starts.....He may even be benched for Brohm by week 11. We will then start our merri-go-round of QBs much like the cowboys, broncs, bears, vikes and every other team in the league. What a shame.

[HarveyWallbangers]

Well, it was bound to happen. Brett wasn't going to play forever. At least this way the Pack has a year to evaluate Rodgers before he goes into his contract year--typically when a team would extend a guy before he hits UFA. I wouldn't classify myself as a Rodgers homer. I hated that he dropped to us, but he's really improved each year. By his second year, I was intrigued. After watching him last preseason, I felt he was quite similar to Matt Hasselbeck. After the Dallas game, I had high hopes that he'll be a good QB in the NFL. He'll have to prove it though.

[Freak Out]

I'll wait and see if he makes it through the pre-season. Has M3 said how he plans on playing the QBs in these games?

[mmmdk]

Passing: 24 TDs, 12ints, 3400 yards and 62% comp.

Rushing: 220 yards, 2TDs and 12 fumbles/7 lost.

That's in 16 games.

[Pacopete4]

Im bored....Ill bump it too.....

250/400
26 touchdowns
14 interceptions
3200 yards

200 rush yards
2 rush touchdowns


94.58 rating.


AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... YOU GOTTA BE SHITTIN ME... WATCH OUT FAVRE CUZ YOUR RECORDS ARE ABOUT TO FALL.............. AAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHA

[3irty1]

2800 yards
18 TD
10 INT

He's going to win games but I doubt he's going to dazzle.

[The Gunshooter]

12-4, same stats as Favre last year with 300 yards rushing and a pro bowl berth.

[Lurker64]

441/621
5,233 yards passing
52 Touchdowns
4 Interceptions

16-0 Baby!

[prsnfoto]

24-48
220 yds
2 TDs
4 INTs

:D :shock:

[Freak Out]

441/621
5,233 yards passing
52 Touchdowns
4 Interceptions

16-0 Baby!

Don't bogard that kool-aid my friend...pass it over to me.

I would be happy with that kind of performance out of Rodgers. :lol:

http://www.snorgtees.com/images/KoolAidMan_Fullpic_2.gif

[MadScientist]

176 / 321
2023 yards passing
7 TD
8 INT

141 Yds russing


Instead of pulling numbers out of my ass, I pulled them out of Hasselbeck's first year in Seattle. (The numbers were for 12 games, which is plausible for AR). Hasselbeck didn't turn into a good QB until his 3rd year.

I chose Hasslebeck as he was the last Favre understudy to go on to be a starter. The other stat line to look at would be Brett's first year in GB:

302/471 3227yds 18 TD, 13 INT (13 games)

I'd say most hear are predicting a higher TD/INT ratio that should be reasonably expected.

[Chevelle2]

Thought Id bump this to allow more people to get their predictions in.

[The Leaper]

My guess?

14 games played
59% comp
3000 yards
20 TD
14 INT

[Gunakor]

From the looks of things, we might be leading the NFL in drops come January. So it's kinda hard to predict. Add on to that the ineffectiveness of our offensive line and the slower than hoped for recovery of Ryan Grant and I think Rodgers is going to struggle some, especially early on. However the second half of our schedule is alot easier than the first, so I think we are poised to go on a tear in the final 8 games if we are healthy.


2800-3100 yards, 25-30 TD throws, 15-20 INT's, 55-60% completion percentage, 25-35 sacks (most of them coming early in the season).

[Merlin]

I would say using Hasselbeck's numbers is fair. Although I don't think Rodgers will play all 16 games, especially if our line keeps blocking so well :oops: :oops:

[cheesner]

176 / 321
2023 yards passing
7 TD
8 INT

141 Yds russing


Instead of pulling numbers out of my ass, I pulled them out of Hasselbeck's first year in Seattle. (The numbers were for 12 games, which is plausible for AR). Hasselbeck didn't turn into a good QB until his 3rd year.

I chose Hasslebeck as he was the last Favre understudy to go on to be a starter. The other stat line to look at would be Brett's first year in GB:

302/471 3227yds 18 TD, 13 INT (13 games)

I'd say most hear are predicting a higher TD/INT ratio that should be reasonably expected.

The difference is that AR was much further along than MH coming out of college. I expect AR to be further along and more successful. AR also has more talent and more talent around him.

I am going with 325/500 3600 yds 28 TDS 17 INTS

[Zool]

Assuming he plays 14 games, I'll go with

2800yards 17td/14int

[mmmdk]

Passing: 24 TDs, 12ints, 3400 yards and 62% comp.

Rushing: 220 yards, 2TDs and 12 fumbles/7 lost.

That's in 16 games.

I'll stick with the above barring injury and what not. This is due to the strenght of the Packers; namely our WR corps. Plus our D is will give up more points in my book; more catching other teams from behind in games.

Packers of 2008 will resemble Packers of 2006 in wins but play better. 2007 will be hard to copy; this is the NFL, new season and Packers are not a powerhouse (yet). A 9-7 record is good in 2008.

[SnakeLH2006]

356 completions
535 attempts
4155 yards
66.5 comp. %
7.77 yards/att.
82 long
28 TDs
15 Int
15 Sacks
95.7 QB Rating

...................wait, who are we talking about?? :lol:

[The Gunshooter]

12-4, same stats as Favre last year with 300 yards rushing and a pro bowl berth.

:D

[mission]

176 / 321
2023 yards passing
7 TD
8 INT

141 Yds russing


Instead of pulling numbers out of my ass, I pulled them out of Hasselbeck's first year in Seattle. (The numbers were for 12 games, which is plausible for AR). Hasselbeck didn't turn into a good QB until his 3rd year.

I chose Hasslebeck as he was the last Favre understudy to go on to be a starter. The other stat line to look at would be Brett's first year in GB:

302/471 3227yds 18 TD, 13 INT (13 games)

I'd say most hear are predicting a higher TD/INT ratio that should be reasonably expected.

You're definitely not allowed on the bandwagon. :lol:

[Chevelle2]

I
14 interceptions


:lol:

[mission]

Was there another one of these threads? I coulda swore I responded to one and agreed with Carolina_Packers prediction for the most part ... not seeing that now, though. :?: