PDA

View Full Version : Sheehan vs. Pelosi



Kiwon
08-12-2008, 06:00 AM
Com'on radical Rats,

Your icon is on the ballot in San Francisco.

Cindy needs your money. Now's your chance to send a woman to Congress with the balls to have Bush and Cheney impeached, tried for war crimes and executed.

Don't let Cindy down. Your donation can help return America back to her greatness. Push back against the industrial-military complex.

Sheehan for Congress!!

http://www.cindyforcongress.org/img/original/Head_3_right.jpg

http://www.cindyforcongress.org/

The Leaper
08-12-2008, 08:14 AM
And people wonder why Washington is a joke.

Harlan Huckleby
08-12-2008, 11:03 AM
Com'on radical Rats,

I don't think we have a single "radical" Rat, at least not on the left.

GoPackGo
08-12-2008, 11:06 AM
http://www.cindyforcongress.org/img/original/Victor2.gif


pffffffffffft

sheepshead
08-12-2008, 11:47 AM
she looks like she smells bad.

SkinBasket
08-12-2008, 12:56 PM
Is she still doing this "for her son?"

Kiwon
08-12-2008, 05:07 PM
Com'on radical Rats,

I don't think we have a single "radical" Rat, at least not on the left.

Of course, you don't.

Your New York Times lexicon tells you so.

falco
08-12-2008, 05:14 PM
who gives a shit

Kiwon
08-12-2008, 06:21 PM
who gives a shit

More memorable quotes from falco. That's right up there with, "blah, blah, blah"

http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/844/bsaeeg3.jpg

Funny how you guys lionize her......until she needs your money. Then it's, "who gives a shit."

Tyrone Bigguns
08-12-2008, 07:19 PM
Care to give us examples of "us" lionizing her.

We all await.

falco
08-12-2008, 07:21 PM
who gives a shit

More memorable quotes from falco. That's right up there with, "blah, blah, blah"

http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/844/bsaeeg3.jpg

Funny how you guys lionize her......until she needs your money. Then it's, "who gives a shit."

i'm glad my musings have made an impression on you :lol:

i've got about as much compassion for cindy sheehan as i do for you and your douchebaggery

Kiwon
08-12-2008, 09:31 PM
i've got about as much compassion for cindy sheehan as i do for you and your douchebaggery

And you can add "respect for the truth and the English language" to your little rant.

Kiwon
08-12-2008, 09:35 PM
Care to give us examples of "us" lionizing her.

We all await.

Slacker. You pull the threads and prove that you lib Rats didn't.

Tyrone Bigguns
08-12-2008, 09:36 PM
Kiwon,

Why are you such a dick? I'm curious.

You rarely see any of the "radicals" start threads designed to antagonize, etc.

You seem to do it quite frequently. Is this a cry for help. Do you think you are effective.

Mostly, you just come across as a dick.

GBRulz
08-12-2008, 10:04 PM
BSAE?? :oops:

BallHawk
08-12-2008, 10:10 PM
BSAE?? :oops:

Haha, didn't notice that the first time round.

Harlan Huckleby
08-12-2008, 10:18 PM
Com'on radical Rats,

I don't think we have a single "radical" Rat, at least not on the left.

Of course, you don't.

Your New York Times lexicon tells you so.

So you think the NY Times is radical?

Tyrone Bigguns
08-12-2008, 10:22 PM
Care to give us examples of "us" lionizing her.

We all await.

Slacker. You pull the threads and prove that you lib Rats didn't.

Oh, i see..you are from guilty until proven innocent school. You sling mud and then expect us to prove we aren't...hard to disprove a negative.

Nice american values you are showing. :oops:

mraynrand
08-12-2008, 10:38 PM
Care to give us examples of "us" lionizing her.

We all await.

Slacker. You pull the threads and prove that you lib Rats didn't.

Oh, i see..you are from guilty until proven innocent school. You sling mud and then expect us to prove we aren't...hard to disprove a negative.



If it is demonstrated that Tyrone could not possibly have lionized Cindy Sheehan, Kiwon's theory would absolutely fall apart.

Tyrone Bigguns
08-12-2008, 10:46 PM
Care to give us examples of "us" lionizing her.

We all await.

Slacker. You pull the threads and prove that you lib Rats didn't.

Oh, i see..you are from guilty until proven innocent school. You sling mud and then expect us to prove we aren't...hard to disprove a negative.



If it is demonstrated that Tyrone could not possibly have lionized Cindy Sheehan, Kiwon's theory would absolutely fall apart.

Ty only "lionizes" hot protesters.

Pam Anderson for Peta, for example.

texaspackerbacker
08-13-2008, 01:58 AM
There's a gigantic point being missed here.

Even in the heart of leftist San Francisco, if you split the vote enough, a Republican could sneak in and rid us of Pelosi.

Kiwon
08-13-2008, 03:39 AM
You rarely see any of the "radicals" start threads designed to antagonize, etc.

http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?t=13549&highlight=


Mostly, you just come across as a dick.

Which would explain your fascination. Just don't move to the fantasy stage.

There is help for gender confusion though, but the first step is admitting you have a problem. Straight away, go to your closet, and throw away your dresses and pumps. Lingerie too. No keeping souvenirs.

It'll be tough but making a clean break is best. Say goodbye to that inner woman of yours once and for all and don't look back. Think of all the money you'll save not buying makeup.

Tyrone Bigguns
08-13-2008, 03:08 PM
You rarely see any of the "radicals" start threads designed to antagonize, etc.

http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?t=13549&highlight=


Mostly, you just come across as a dick.

Which would explain your fascination. Just don't move to the fantasy stage.

There is help for gender confusion though, but the first step is admitting you have a problem. Straight away, go to your closet, and throw away your dresses and pumps. Lingerie too. No keeping souvenirs.

It'll be tough but making a clean break is best. Say goodbye to that inner woman of yours once and for all and don't look back. Think of all the money you'll save not buying makeup.

Wow, you dont' understand the word "rarely." I posted at best 5 times....to show you guys what it would be like.

Pwned.

You knowledge of gender confusion is quite remarkable...and telling. :lol:

Kiwon
10-20-2008, 07:33 PM
You guys are letting Saint Cindy down. Pelosi's playing dirty.

Maybe you guys should start fightthejeers.com


.................................................. .............

Hanky Campaignky

Posted by Cindy Sheehan 12:00 AM Oct 13, 2008

Hanky Campaignky?

The past few weeks have been a little strange at Cindy for Congress and, I guess the things that have been happening could just be coincidences, or a run of bad luck, but the climate for the possibility of campaign hanky-panky certainly exists.

Campaigns have been compromised since the beginning of campaign history, but these days with legal warrantless wiretapping and political party conventions sponsored by AT&T and the constant call of "all hail to my political party" and obeisance to the banksters above what's good for our nation, maybe what's been happening on my campaign isn't coincidental or "Mercury retrograde," or whatever.

Starting with the necessity of "changing a light bulb" (bugging my phone) in my hotel phone at the DNC (brought to you by AT&T) while I was out of the room, Cindy for Congress has had an increasing number of attacks. Two weeks ago, we were begged by organizers of a "radical" music festival called "We the People(Sheeple)" forbade me from speaking after having begged me to be there. An article in LA Beat said that the Mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigoso was involved in the decision to silence my voice. Not only did we go down to L.A. at our own expense, but also we took an entire day of valuable campaign time to do so.

The past week, though, has been incredibly trying. First of all we had to file a restraining order against a former volunteer whom, with hindsight, we now know was probably spying on us for the Pelosi camp. After we let this person go, his emails to us became increasingly hostile and threatening. After that happened, the tail lights in our campaign-mobile were busted out (the campaign mobile that has Cindy for Congress signs all over it and pictures of it were in an AP story.

Towards the end of the week, four young men walked into our office and they were acting quite suspiciously as they pretended to be registering to vote. One of our interns was helping them when I heard her yell: "No! Stop!" I heard an awful noise and ran out of my office to see the young men run off. They had grabbed one of our computers (leaving a jar of donations on the front desk) and beat our intern over the head when she tried to stop them. Our front windows are almost totally covered with signs and posters and it would be hard to see what we have from the street…we did, thankfully, recover the computer which has sensitive material on it and we are even more thankful that Somer is okay. (She's tough like her boss).

After several days of harassment, I got home late one night to discover a jury summons in my mailbox. I have been summoned to jury duty the week of, you guessed it, the elections!

The final (and in my opinion worse) weird thing happened on Saturday night. We had scheduled a group of "robo" calls to go out today (Monday, Oct 13). At 10:30 Saturday night, we started getting phone calls and emails blasting us for sending out the calls at 10:30 on a Saturday night, which is not only illegal, but extremely annoying. The company had approached us to donate 10,000 calls to us and then was charging us a small fee for the rest of the calls. 38,000 early/absentee voters received this call and my office has been overwhelmed with angry voters who won't be voting for me now and some of the good will that we have been building here in San Francisco for the last year went down the drain in just a few minutes. Was it just a "glitch" in the system, as the owner of the robo-call company claims, or overt sabotage of the campaign? Isn't it sad that we have to be paranoid about all of this? To be sure, our office is in a rough part of town, but the frequency of the harassment is certainly intensifying.

The stakes are high and I have a feeling "they" won't stop at anything to assure that the tyranny of incumbency continues.