Packers should have kept Ingle Martin

[SkinBasket]

He did have the best stat line from this weekend's game against Oakland of any Titan QB. Since a lot of us like to base our player evaluations on preseason games, it's only logical that Ingle will be the next Steve Young. Ted really screwed that one up and needs to be immediately executed in front of Lombardi's memorial and his head offered up as appeasement to his everlasting soul.

[Pacopete4]

Ingle would be our most athletic QB on the team... just has to learn how to actually play the game though

[SkinBasket]

An athlete. That was Ingle in a nutshell. Athelticism defined. The very essence of athleticism some would say. Or not.

[Zool]

Dont you mean

Packers should of kept Ingle Martin?

[mraynrand]

He did have the best stat line from this weekend's game against Oakland of any Titan QB. Since a lot of us like to base our player evaluations on preseason games, it's only logical that Ingle will be the next Steve Young. Ted really screwed that one up and needs to be immediately executed in front of Lombardi's memorial and his head offered up as appeasement to his everlasting soul.

Easing up on TT just a little, aren't we? You must be some sort of TT sycophant and Favre lover. If you really hated TT, you would be in favor of defiling his body.

[Pacopete4]

Choose:


QB #1: 9 for 15- 60%, 142 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT, 1 sack
5 rushes for 16 yards, no TDs


QB #2: 18 for 31- 58%, 175 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 6 sacks
1 rush for 3 yards, no TDs


QB #3: 17 for 23- 75%, 239 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT, 4 sacks
No Rushes


QB #4: 5 for 6- 83%, 48 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT, 1 sack
No Rushes

[LL2]

#4 is Favre. Who are the others?

[SkinBasket]

#4 is Favre. Who are the others?

Doesn't matter. He's making my point for me by asking us to choose a QB based on preseason numbers. Thanks Paco.

[KYPack]

Halfway funny, Skin.

Good to see you bafck in stride.

[rbaloha1]

You may be correct.

Have not watched Ingle play but I seem to recall IM possessing the strongest arm at the combine.

[Maxie the Taxi]

If Martin's father had been Congressman John Dingell, his name would be Ingle Dingell.

[Pacopete4]

#1- Ingle Martin
#2- Aaron Rodgers
#3- Colt Brennan
#4- Brett Favre



... I didn't put those up there to say there was a meaning behind preseason Skin... I just did it cuz we've been talking about Ingle and Colt today.. thats all

[SkinBasket]

#1- Ingle Martin
#2- Aaron Rodgers
#3- Colt Brennan
#4- Brett Favre



... I didn't put those up there to say there was a meaning behind preseason Skin... I just did it cuz we've been talking about Ingle and Colt today.. thats all

Strange then you would ask us to choose one from that particular group based on their preseason stats... thats all.


My name is Dede!!!

I like to dance!!!

[Pacopete4]

#1- Ingle Martin
#2- Aaron Rodgers
#3- Colt Brennan
#4- Brett Favre



... I didn't put those up there to say there was a meaning behind preseason Skin... I just did it cuz we've been talking about Ingle and Colt today.. thats all

Strange then you would ask us to choose one from that particular group based on their preseason stats... thats all.


My name is Dede!!!

I like to dance!!!



How else could I get Ingle Martin and Colt Brennan stats? haha it was juts for fun, no meaning...

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Clearly #3 is the best qb. The stats don't lie.

[sheepshead]

Dont you mean

Packers should of kept Ingle Martin?


While "should of" is accepted(God only knows why), it should make you cringe to see the preposition "of" used that way.

The skin meister has it right.

[Brohm]

And here I thought someone was just speaking fast when I heard it -> contracted should've for "should have" :lol:

[Zool]

Dont you mean

Packers should of kept Ingle Martin?


While "should of" is accepted(God only knows why), it should make you cringe to see the preposition "of" used that way.

The skin meister has it right.

[sarcasm]

[Scott Campbell]

#1- Ingle Martin
#2- Aaron Rodgers
#3- Colt Brennan
#4- Brett Favre




Like they say in the mutual fund prospectus's, past performance is not always indicative of future results.

[Cleft Crusty]

#1- Ingle Martin
#2- Aaron Rodgers
#3- Colt Brennan
#4- Brett Favre




Like they say in the mutual fund prospectus's, past performance is not always indicative of future results.

I say this to my wife. I also say this about prescription meds. Also, regarding the title subject, my psychiatrist would say: "Stop 'shoulding' on yourself"

[CaliforniaCheez]

Some people have no memory!

Ingle Martin played very poorly when he was with the Packers and should have been cut.

Flynn has looked better than Rodgers or Martin did as rookies.

[Tarlam!]

Hey, Skin, wanna hear a joke?

[SkinBasket]

Do I have a choice? We're on a forum you poop pot.

[Maxie the Taxi]

And if he wasn't married, he'd be Single Ingle Dingell.