Heading Them Off At The Pass

[The Shadow]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Fuck you Shadow.

Nothing you write can change the fact that arod sucks and brett is the greatest qb of all time..and will cease to be great only when he decides to stop playing.

[BallHawk]

The situation with A-Rod is quite similar to the situation in Blazing Saddles.

A-Rod is the new sheriff (QB), but people are skeptical because he's different (Not Brett Favre). Only a few people support him and the people that support him are from Wisconsin (Gene Wilder)

Anyways, all these badasses (Vikings) are gonna destroy the town (NFC North). But the new sheriff (Aaron) devises a plan and unites the town (The team gets behind him) and they end up destroying the badasses (Beat the Vikings in the NFC North)

The sheriff (Aaron) is pronounced a hero and he rides off into the sunset (wins a Super Bowl)

On another note, we're gonna need a shitload of dimes.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Your whole analogy is ridiculous...arod ain't black. :roll:

[BallHawk]

Your whole analogy is ridiculous...arod ain't black. :roll:

Damn. How could I overlook that?

[pasquale]

On another note, we're gonna need a shitload of dimes.

that's quite possibly my favorite line from that movie. love it. :bclap:

[hoosier]

A laurel and a hardy handshake for our new...town........ :shock:

[pasquale]

who's mongo then?

(and the lob is up...)

[Chevelle2]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

I was just thinking about this the other day....may I use these responses in a copy-paste fashion?

[oregonpackfan]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

[retailguy]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

Shouldn't you have used some kind of emoticon? :?:

[retailguy]

:P 8-)

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

Shouldn't you have used some kind of emoticon? :?:

I guess so...the second paragraphs was so ridiculous i didn't think anybody would take it literally.

I guess it is another case of PT Barnum.

[BallHawk]

I caught the sarcasm. It was kinda obvious, IMO. But I guess you have to know Ty is a sarcastic bastard to get it. :D

[digitaldean]

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b32/spiffywonderboy/10182007/mongo.gif

Mongo love Sheriff A-Rod, errr , Bart.

[Zool]

Mongo not like that. Mongo straight.

[LEWCWA]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

[Zool]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

[BallHawk]

http://www.movieactors.com/freezeframes5/blazingsad55.jpeg
Candygram for Aaron! Candygram for Aaron!

[KYPack]

who's mongo then?



Alex Karras

Pic above.

[BallHawk]

http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/political-pictures-barack-obama-blazing-saddles.jpg

[GBRulz]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

About as useful as this thread itself.

[Zool]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

About as useful as this thread itself.

To quote a specific poster "how about if you don't like the subject, ignore the thread."

[GBRulz]

So, it's ok for you to throw sarcastic remarks at someone saying their remark was well though out, but i can't say anything back ?

:roll:

[Charles Woodson]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

About as useful as this thread itself.

To quote a specific poster "how about if you don't like the subject, ignore the thread."

GBRulz im with you on that, but then again you did say that... Cant have it both ways...

[Scott Campbell]

Cant have it both ways...



Members of the fairer sex often can have it both ways.

[GBRulz]

Yeah, I guess this isn't Burger King, is it?

[Scott Campbell]

Yeah, I guess this isn't Burger King, is it?


You do know there's a "whopper" joke coming from Tyrone any moment now.

[bobblehead]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!! :lol:

[cpk1994]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.This really isn't a prememptive strike as Paco and a few others alreday shouted out those 3 responses Saturday.

[Bretsky]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.This really isn't a prememptive strike as Paco and a few others alreday shouted out those 3 responses Saturday.

I thought this was settled Saturday; anyways great to bring it back up again

This thread sucks

[MadtownPacker]

I thought this was settled Saturday; anyways great to bring it back up again

This thread sucksThat what I thought too.

[Bretsky]

I thought this was settled Saturday; anyways great to bring it back up again

This thread sucksThat what I thought too.


The Brilliant Minds think alike once again :lol:

[Guiness]

who's mongo then?

(and the lob is up...)

Geez, knee jerk is that it's got to be Fat Pat. He's been talking about Rodgers so much, you have to think other Packers are telling him 'Uh-oh, Aaron. I think Pat here's taken a liking to you.'

'course, and argument could be made for Urlacher

[Guiness]

I guess so...the second paragraphs was so ridiculous i didn't think anybody would take it literally.

I guess it is another case of PT Barnum.

Really? And here I thought it was a rare moment of lucidity from our favorite crack smoking, high end appliance knowledgeable Packer following person of colour.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!! :lol:

Ty woulda...but has been implored by Mad and Zool to be nicer.

Ty has been PCd.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I guess so...the second paragraphs was so ridiculous i didn't think anybody would take it literally.

I guess it is another case of PT Barnum.

Really? And here I thought it was a rare moment of lucidity from our favorite crack smoking, high end appliance knowledgeable Packer following person of colour.

Ty is a man of color.

Ty doesn't appreciate you bringing in the king's english into this thread.

Go see a flick and leave your flat you socialist bastard.

[The Shadow]

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

I was just thinking about this the other day....may I use these responses in a copy-paste fashion?


Please do.
The whiny posts are inevitable.

[Bretsky]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!! :lol:

Ty woulda...but has been implored by Mad and Zool to be nicer.

Ty has been PCd.


well good; that means there's no need for me to do it too :lol:

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Fuck you Shadow.



Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!! :lol:

Ty woulda...but has been implored by Mad and Zool to be nicer.

Ty has been PCd.


well good; that means there's no need for me to do it too :lol:

Fuck you bretsky!!

[bobblehead]

I thought this was settled Saturday; anyways great to bring it back up again

This thread sucksThat what I thought too.


The Brilliant Minds think alike once again :lol:

uhhh.....