PDA

View Full Version : Rating the D-Lineman



Harlan Huckleby
08-22-2008, 01:58 AM
I divide the Packer D-linemen into 4 categories:

Excellent - Kampman
Good - Pickens, Jolly
Mediocre - Jenkins, KGB
Garbage - everyone else

I know this looks really harsh, but compare the quality of defensive linemen that the Packers face each and every week. The other guys are able to apply pressure and make plays from end to end, and I don't believe that is because all our O-lineman are sucky.

Jenkins & KGB certainly have had spurts of greatness in recent years, but if you look at their consistent production, they are just average performers.

I don't see squat from guys deeper in the depth chart, they look inept to me. Maybe I missed somebody.

I would be interested how other people would fill these four bins.

Fritz
08-22-2008, 06:48 AM
Kinda gotta agree. I think a strong defensive line is mandatory if you're going to win consstently in the NFL.

TT tried to address this in part with the Harrell pick and signing Pickett. Pickett is working out, Harrell, so far, is the second coming of Jamaal Reynolds.

I understand him not wanting to break the bank for Corey Williams. That's okay. But it looks like it would've been nice to see another defensive tackle be drafted this year.

It's an area of concern.

RashanGary
08-22-2008, 07:22 AM
Scary.

hoosier
08-22-2008, 07:59 AM
I don't see how you can rank KGB as mediocre. For what the Packers ask him to do, he's undoubtedly in the top 50%, maybe even significantly higher. In fact, I can't think of many who have performed as well on a consistent basis over the last seven years. Let's compare him to active defensive lineman that play RE in 4-3 defenses. Who else would you rather have playing on passing downs? In the NFC I can count them on one hand: Umenyiora, Jason Taylor, Trent Cole, Allen. Another group, including Will Smith, Bertrand Berry, John Abraham, Mark Anderson and probably others I'm forgetting about, are about even in terms of pass rushing. Now if KGB were still being asked to play RE full-time and stop the run, then I would have an easier time accepting your ranking.

I'm also not ready to put Jolly in the same category as "Pickens" (that's Pickett to you, son). Jolly hasn't even proven he can stay on the field--or off the police blotter--for a full season yet. And regarding the rest of them that you throw in the garbage heap: Thompson and Montgomery might turn out to be something more than mere garbage.

Maxie the Taxi
08-22-2008, 08:21 AM
I think this thread is an indication of why the Packers are flirting with the 2-D-linemen/5 LB formation.

KYPack
08-22-2008, 08:36 AM
I divide the Packer D-linemen into 4 categories:

Excellent - Kampman
Good - Pickens, Jolly
Mediocre - Jenkins, KGB
Garbage - everyone else

I know this looks really harsh, but compare the quality of defensive linemen that the Packers face each and every week. The other guys are able to apply pressure and make plays from end to end, and I don't believe that is because all our O-lineman are sucky.

Jenkins & KGB certainly have had spurts of greatness in recent years, but if you look at their consistent production, they are just average performers.

I don't see squat from guys deeper in the depth chart, they look inept to me. Maybe I missed somebody.

I would be interested how other people would fill these four bins.

Pretty much agree. I do think Jenkins can elevate is level of play. If we have 4 guys that good to excellent, we can field a good line. That may be a stretch.

You can double the garbage rating for Cole. I don't know how that guy keeps his gig. OL's do anything they want with that guy. He has no push whatsoever.

Harlan Huckleby
08-22-2008, 10:00 AM
I don't see how you can rank KGB as mediocre. For what the Packers ask him to do, he's undoubtedly in the top 50%, maybe even significantly higher. In fact, I can't think of many who have performed as well on a consistent basis over the last seven years

How effective was he last year, and what is a reasonable projection for this season given his knee looks chronically damaged?

"Mediocre" means that half the DE's in the league who get significant playing time are better, half are worse. I don't see KGB getting near the QB very often, and he doesn't play the run well (they don't always pass on third down.) He is now average at best.

Regarding KY's point about Jenkins, it's true its possible he is going to return to the form that he flashed a couple years ago. But you can't say he is more than "just a guy" until it happens.


Thompson and Montgomery might turn out to be something more than mere garbage.

Well, we're talking about the roster for THIS season. Montgomery - sorry, he is garbage. Thompson - a project.

Scott Campbell
08-22-2008, 10:04 AM
I wanted a DE with the first pick in the draft. It needs to be addressed.

Harlan Huckleby
08-22-2008, 10:05 AM
I think Jason Taylor would have been a smart gamble.

Scott Campbell
08-22-2008, 10:26 AM
I think Jason Taylor would have been a smart gamble.


Nice short term move. A second and a sixth sounds a little steep, but not outrageous. But I think we need numbers - more than just one player.

hoosier
08-22-2008, 10:37 AM
How effective was he last year, and what is a reasonable projection for this season given his knee looks chronically damaged?

"Mediocre" means that half the DE's in the league who get significant playing time are better, half are worse. I don't see KGB getting near the QB very often, and he doesn't play the run well (they don't always pass on third down.) He is now average at best.

Last year he had 9.5 sacks while missing the last quarter of the season, and if you respect McGinn's analysis he was maybe having his best year ever before he got hurt. So I don't know what you're seeing that McGinn and the stats are missing.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=783218.

I haven't read anything that would make me think he would be unable to perform at a similar level this year. You say the knee is chronically damaged, but on what basis? The fact that he's being held out of preseason games isn't necessarily significant. I don't think we'll really know until the season starts. But barring any strong evidence to the contrary, I am inclined to be optimistic.

KYPack
08-22-2008, 10:37 AM
We did draft a Dlineman this year. We traded a 4th and one of TT's beloved 5th's for the Jets 4th in last years draft. Drafted DE J Thompson. It was the first time in the draft history of Ted T he ever traded up for a pick.

So far the kid looks 100% lost.

I'm still trying to figure out how we went from on of the deepest Dlines in the league to hurtin' for certain in the off-season.

Harlan Huckleby
08-22-2008, 10:41 AM
Last year he had 9.5 sacks while missing the last quarter of the season, and if you respect McGinn's analysis he was maybe having his best year ever before he got hurt. So I don't know what you're seeing that McGinn and the stats are missing.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=783218.

My time is far too valuable to read that article, but i will concede the argument. I was confusing his previous season where I believe he struggled. The years all start to run together when the sand in the hour glass is almost run down.

But still, KGB had his cartilege surgery a long time ago, the fact that he still can't get on the practice field means you can't count him for much.

retailguy
08-22-2008, 12:09 PM
I'm still trying to figure out how we went from on of the deepest Dlines in the league to hurtin' for certain in the off-season.

I'll take a stab at this one...

1. We traded Corey Williams
2. Pickett has been hurt.
3. Jolly is trying to become a pharmacist during the offseason without a license.
4. KGB replaced his bad knee with an on sale Walmart knee.
5. Muir's promising development has evaporated.
6. Montgomery continues to tease, but is NEVER consistent.
7. Jenkins looks average.

did I miss anything?

Maxie the Taxi
08-22-2008, 12:14 PM
I'm still trying to figure out how we went from on of the deepest Dlines in the league to hurtin' for certain in the off-season.

I'll take a stab at this one...

1. We traded Corey Williams
2. Pickett has been hurt.
3. Jolly is trying to become a pharmacist during the offseason without a license.
4. KGB replaced his bad knee with an on sale Walmart knee.
5. Muir's promising development has evaporated.
6. Montgomery continues to tease, but is NEVER consistent.
7. Jenkins looks average.

did I miss anything?

8. Justin Harrell is still hurt.

Cleft Crusty
08-22-2008, 12:15 PM
Last year he had 9.5 sacks while missing the last quarter of the season, and if you respect McGinn's analysis he was maybe having his best year ever before he got hurt. So I don't know what you're seeing that McGinn and the stats are missing.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=783218.

My time is far too valuable to read that article, but i will concede the argument. I was confusing his previous season where I believe he struggled. The years all start to run together when the sand in the hour glass is almost run down.

But still, KGB had his cartilege surgery a long time ago, the fact that he still can't get on the practice field means you can't count him for much.

KGB's role changed to pass rush specialist and it did wonders for him. if you recall, he was pretty good even in the NFC championship game, making a critical play late that should have given the Packers offense a chance to ice the game (pun intended). The worry is certainly the knee, which may be bone on bone, effectively finishing KGB's career. This will be a big story - will KGB even be on the final roster with his bum knee, and will this be another area of regret for Thompson if the Packers can generate no pass rush. As others have suggested, this may be why the defensive scheme may be looking more towards the LBs to generate pressure, simply because the D-line has no dominant pass rusher.

retailguy
08-22-2008, 12:19 PM
I'm still trying to figure out how we went from on of the deepest Dlines in the league to hurtin' for certain in the off-season.

I'll take a stab at this one...

1. We traded Corey Williams
2. Pickett has been hurt.
3. Jolly is trying to become a pharmacist during the offseason without a license.
4. KGB replaced his bad knee with an on sale Walmart knee.
5. Muir's promising development has evaporated.
6. Montgomery continues to tease, but is NEVER consistent.
7. Jenkins looks average.

did I miss anything?

8. Justin Harrell is still hurt.

Oh yeah. Thanks.

How could I forget that one? :roll: (I was sitting in a motel parking lot in Iowa when that pick was announced - my kids were at a birthday party in the motel pool. I distinctly remember thinking, WHO? and WTF?. Later I found out the guy had been hurt, didn't even know it at the time...)

Maxie the Taxi
08-22-2008, 12:24 PM
I'm still trying to figure out how we went from on of the deepest Dlines in the league to hurtin' for certain in the off-season.

I'll take a stab at this one...

1. We traded Corey Williams
2. Pickett has been hurt.
3. Jolly is trying to become a pharmacist during the offseason without a license.
4. KGB replaced his bad knee with an on sale Walmart knee.
5. Muir's promising development has evaporated.
6. Montgomery continues to tease, but is NEVER consistent.
7. Jenkins looks average.

did I miss anything?

8. Justin Harrell is still hurt.

Oh yeah. Thanks.

How could I forget that one? :roll: (I was sitting in a motel parking lot in Iowa when that pick was announced - my kids were at a birthday party in the motel pool. I distinctly remember thinking, WHO? and WTF?. Later I found out the guy had been hurt, didn't even know it at the time...)

So was Harrell, I think.

sharpe1027
08-22-2008, 01:09 PM
How about this:

Excellent - Kampman
Very Good - Pickett
Good - Jolly
Mediocre - Jenkins, KGB
Garbage - everyone else

Pickens has been doing everything asked of him, which usually invovles taking on two blockers. He was the biggest reason for Barnett's success last year, IMO.

mmmdk
08-22-2008, 01:38 PM
I divide the Packer D-linemen into 4 categories:

Excellent - Kampman
Good - Pickens, Jolly
Mediocre - Jenkins, KGB
Garbage - everyone else

I know this looks really harsh, but compare the quality of defensive linemen that the Packers face each and every week. The other guys are able to apply pressure and make plays from end to end, and I don't believe that is because all our O-lineman are sucky.

Jenkins & KGB certainly have had spurts of greatness in recent years, but if you look at their consistent production, they are just average performers.

I don't see squat from guys deeper in the depth chart, they look inept to me. Maybe I missed somebody.

I would be interested how other people would fill these four bins.

I agree :shock: