Peter King names ___ ___ Defensive player of the week

[packers11]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/10/20/week7/2.html

Defensive Player of the Week

Nick Barnett, LB, Green Bay. To watch this game was to watch one of the most frustrating days of Peyton Manning's career. The Packers defense, led by Barnett (six tackles, two tackles for loss, excellent sideline-to-sideline athleticism), kept Manning scoreless on eight of 10 possessions and forced him into throwing two interceptions, both returned for Green Bay touchdowns.

[oregonpackfan]

This must come as bitter "eating crow" for the Barnett-Bashers on this forum who continually belittle Barnett's skills and value to this team. :roll:

[SkinBasket]

Peter King has spoken. So he hath proclaimed it, so shall it be!

I think King must have owed him a beer or something and they settled on this.

[Zool]

Thank goodness for Peter King. Without him I wouldnt realize that drag down tackles are the new MVP material. Here I thought stopping a back for no more gain or even hitting him backwards was the idea.

[ThunderDan]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/10/20/week7/2.html

Defensive Player of the Week

Nick Barnett, LB, Green Bay. To watch this game was to watch one of the most frustrating days of Peyton Manning's career. The Packers defense, led by Barnett (six tackles, two tackles for loss, excellent sideline-to-sideline athleticism), kept Manning scoreless on eight of 10 possessions and forced him into throwing two interceptions, both returned for Green Bay touchdowns.

I have already e-mailed Peter King on this one. What a dope!!! Barnett is not the reason the Packers keep Peyton down. As I stated in another thread if Manning doesn't throw the INTs it's a 20 point swing and the D doesn't look that good.

I give all the credit to Woodson, T Williams, Rouse and "Pro Bowl" Nick Collins. Chillar played well also.

Why Barnett? He had a lot of tackles isn't that what our D scheme is supposed to create for the MLB?

What I saw on run play after play was Barnett getting blown off the ball unable to shed blockers.

[boiga]

On the other hand, Barnett has led the team in tackles this year. He's the guy managing the total defensive effort with the radio in his helmet and should get some credit when the defense puts together a complete effort like this one.

I think there's been a learning curve regarding on field communication and the radio. Barnett's had a lot more responsibility than in the past and is only just now putting all the pieces together.

[retailguy]

On the other hand, Barnett has led the team in tackles this year. He's the guy managing the total defensive effort with the radio in his helmet and should get some credit when the defense puts together a complete effort like this one.

I think there's been a learning curve regarding on field communication and the radio. Barnett's had a lot more responsibility than in the past and is only just now putting all the pieces together.

The pundits here have to bag on somebody. It might as well be Barnett. A couple of season ago it was KGB. Last year it was Kurt Schottenheimer.

It'll be someone new soon.... just be patient.

[cheesner]

On the other hand, Barnett has led the team in tackles this year. He's the guy managing the total defensive effort with the radio in his helmet and should get some credit when the defense puts together a complete effort like this one.

I think there's been a learning curve regarding on field communication and the radio. Barnett's had a lot more responsibility than in the past and is only just now putting all the pieces together.

The pundits here have to bag on somebody. It might as well be Barnett. A couple of season ago it was KGB. Last year it was Kurt Schottenheimer.

It'll be someone new soon.... just be patient.I thought it was always all TT's fault?

[Fritz]

You'd think everybody would know that by now.

[Tony Oday]

Ripping on Kurt Schottenheimer is not out of style...never will be...he still sucks! FIRE Kurt Schottenheimer!!!!!

[gbpackfan]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/10/20/week7/2.html

Defensive Player of the Week

Nick Barnett, LB, Green Bay. To watch this game was to watch one of the most frustrating days of Peyton Manning's career. The Packers defense, led by Barnett (six tackles, two tackles for loss, excellent sideline-to-sideline athleticism), kept Manning scoreless on eight of 10 possessions and forced him into throwing two interceptions, both returned for Green Bay touchdowns.

I have already e-mailed Peter King on this one. What a dope!!! Barnett is not the reason the Packers keep Peyton down. As I stated in another thread if Manning doesn't throw the INTs it's a 20 point swing and the D doesn't look that good.

I give all the credit to Woodson, T Williams, Rouse and "Pro Bowl" Nick Collins. Chillar played well also.

Why Barnett? He had a lot of tackles isn't that what our D scheme is supposed to create for the MLB?

What I saw on run play after play was Barnett getting blown off the ball unable to shed blockers.


Hmmm....a Packer fan emailing King to tell him that Barnett does not deserve any credit for holding an explosive offense down on Sunday. Sure, the secondary played well but so did Barnett. I don't know what more the guy can do to satisfy some of you. It's kind of pathetic. Peter King may look at your email and say "And this guys is calling ME a dope?" But maybe not.

[SkinBasket]

Hmmm....a Packer fan emailing King to tell him that Barnett does not deserve any credit for holding an explosive offense down on Sunday. Sure, the secondary played well but so did Barnett. I don't know what more the guy can do to satisfy some of you. It's kind of pathetic. Peter King may look at your email and say "And this guys is calling ME a dope?" But maybe not.

There's a difference between "playing well" and playing at such a level as to be anointed "defensive player of the week." If Barnett's performance was the best out of the 300 or so defensive efforts out there this week, it was a sad, sad day for defense in the NFL.

IMO Barnett did his job and managed not to fuck up or whip himself into such a self-induced rage as to act stupid or play stupid, as he too often does. If that's the new gold standard for defensive players, then, well, I guess he's the top dog this week.

[red]

wow, i really didn't see anything too special about nicks game

he did have a couple big plays towards the end, but they weren't as big as collins and rouse's picks. and woodson just had played a complete great game, as usual

[gbpackfan]

This forum defines many, many packer fans. Maybe sports fans in general. Nothing is ever good enough. It really is sad. Oh well, it looks like I'm in the minority on this one. So maybe I'm the dope! :shock: :P

[ThunderDan]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/10/20/week7/2.html

Defensive Player of the Week

Nick Barnett, LB, Green Bay. To watch this game was to watch one of the most frustrating days of Peyton Manning's career. The Packers defense, led by Barnett (six tackles, two tackles for loss, excellent sideline-to-sideline athleticism), kept Manning scoreless on eight of 10 possessions and forced him into throwing two interceptions, both returned for Green Bay touchdowns.

I have already e-mailed Peter King on this one. What a dope!!! Barnett is not the reason the Packers keep Peyton down. As I stated in another thread if Manning doesn't throw the INTs it's a 20 point swing and the D doesn't look that good.

I give all the credit to Woodson, T Williams, Rouse and "Pro Bowl" Nick Collins. Chillar played well also.

Why Barnett? He had a lot of tackles isn't that what our D scheme is supposed to create for the MLB?

What I saw on run play after play was Barnett getting blown off the ball unable to shed blockers.


Hmmm....a Packer fan emailing King to tell him that Barnett does not deserve any credit for holding an explosive offense down on Sunday. Sure, the secondary played well but so did Barnett. I don't know what more the guy can do to satisfy some of you. It's kind of pathetic. Peter King may look at your email and say "And this guys is calling ME a dope?" But maybe not.

You really thought the Barnett was the Defensive MVP for the whole league? :shock: You thought he was the MVP for the Packers D? :lol:

Chillar had 3 more tackles than Barnett, two solo. He kept on Dallas Clarke all game and limited 4 yard crossing paterns to 4 yards.

T Williams had 7 solo tackles and a FF. He was tight in coverage all day against a top tiered WR.

Woodson had 2 tackles. What a slacker!!! Limited Harrison most of the day.

Rouse had 1 more tackle than Barnett and had an INT return for a TD.

Collins who I thought played well had only 1 tackle for the game.

Harrison and Wayne had 4 catches for 35 yards for the game. The DB played awesome.

I thought Barnett had a steady game but got pushed off the ball numerous times by blockers. That has to be the first time in weeks we have seen the samuri dance.

I have been wondering if Barnett is more hurt than the Packers have acknowledged. He isn't playing as well as last year.

[ThunderDan]

This forum defines many, many packer fans. Maybe sports fans in general. Nothing is ever good enough. It really is sad. Oh well, it looks like I'm in the minority on this one. So maybe I'm the dope! :shock: :P

Notice I am not calling for Nick Barnetts replacement.

[ThunderDan]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/10/20/week7/2.html

Defensive Player of the Week

Nick Barnett, LB, Green Bay. To watch this game was to watch one of the most frustrating days of Peyton Manning's career. The Packers defense, led by Barnett (six tackles, two tackles for loss, excellent sideline-to-sideline athleticism), kept Manning scoreless on eight of 10 possessions and forced him into throwing two interceptions, both returned for Green Bay touchdowns.

I have already e-mailed Peter King on this one. What a dope!!! Barnett is not the reason the Packers keep Peyton down. As I stated in another thread if Manning doesn't throw the INTs it's a 20 point swing and the D doesn't look that good.

I give all the credit to Woodson, T Williams, Rouse and "Pro Bowl" Nick Collins. Chillar played well also.

Why Barnett? He had a lot of tackles isn't that what our D scheme is supposed to create for the MLB?

What I saw on run play after play was Barnett getting blown off the ball unable to shed blockers.


Hmmm....a Packer fan emailing King to tell him that Barnett does not deserve any credit for holding an explosive offense down on Sunday. Sure, the secondary played well but so did Barnett. I don't know what more the guy can do to satisfy some of you. It's kind of pathetic. Peter King may look at your email and say "And this guys is calling ME a dope?" But maybe not.

Wouldn't you be surprised if my e-mail lands in Tuesdays Edition. :D

[gbpackfan]

I would be. My point is this. Peter King wants to give Nick Barnett, A GREEN BAY PACKER, some props. LET HIM! Geesh. So what if he believes Barnett played lights out. Maybe he saw something you didn't? Well, obviously he did. Ha ha. But don't email the guy, as a Packer fan, and take a shit on Barnett. Let the media put Barnett over if they want. Why would you email him and basically ask him to take it back? IMHO that is just silly.

[ThunderDan]

I would be. My point is this. Peter King wants to give Nick Barnett, A GREEN BAY PACKER, some props. LET HIM! Geesh. So what if he believes Barnett played lights out. Maybe he saw something you didn't? Well, obviously he did. Ha ha. But don't email the guy, as a Packer fan, and take a shit on Barnett. Let the media put Barnett over if they want. Why would you email him and basically ask him to take it back? IMHO that is just silly.

Hey, it is great to see the Pack get some props. But its the wrong guy and you know it!!!

[HarveyWallbangers]

Well, Woodson was our stud, but if King wants to give Barnett props, that's fine. I guess it all depends on how you worded the email. If you dumped on Barnett, then I don't agree with that. If you said something like "hey Barnett was solid, but Woodson was the real MVP," then that's good to go in my book.

[gbpackfan]

I would be. My point is this. Peter King wants to give Nick Barnett, A GREEN BAY PACKER, some props. LET HIM! Geesh. So what if he believes Barnett played lights out. Maybe he saw something you didn't? Well, obviously he did. Ha ha. But don't email the guy, as a Packer fan, and take a shit on Barnett. Let the media put Barnett over if they want. Why would you email him and basically ask him to take it back? IMHO that is just silly.

Hey, it is great to see the Pack get some props. But its the wrong guy and you know it!!!

I think Woodson played great! The entire D played lights out. It's hard to tell though sometimes. What were Barnett's assignments? How many passes were not thrown because Barnett was there? It's more then just stats. I have no problem with Peter King praising Barnett. None what so ever. Long overdue!!!!