Jacko's Death, Reason Stranger Gives for Taking Pictures

[Deputy Nutz]

My wife and I took our two children to the Brewers game on Friday night as part of the Firm's family night. It is really great because the seats are right below the children's zone or whatever it is called at Miller Packer, firstbase side, 12 rows up. Real nice.

Of course my night has to have some type of drama, Well like good parents we chase after the kids in the kids area, we are about done but the kids want to sit in the giant baseball glove. My wife starts to take their picture when I notice some strange dude walk over and pulls out his phone. He starts to attempt to take a picture of my kids. I walk right in front of him, and ask him, "why are you taking pictures of my kids?"

He mumbles something, and I say again, "Why the fuck are you taking pictures of my kids?" he then says, "Micheal Jackson, don't you get it?"

I am ready to freak out on this dude, but I don't really want to cause a scene, and scare my kids, but this is just so uncalled for and past creepy. Most likely this dude is just drunk and stupid, but he certainly could be child molester, a pedophile.

More to come later.

So anyways, this scumbag shows me his phone, "See I didn't take a picture." I didn't really give a rip, so I told him again that it is not funny, to go around taking pictures of children that you don't know. He never once apologized to me for his "joke".

I backed off, even though I certainly wanted to let him have it, and it wasn't because he was dumb enough to attempt to take a picture of my kids, but because he thought he was just so funny, and that it was I that had a problem. If he just would have apologized and said it was in bad taste I would have understood a little, I sometimes have bad tasting jokes. But he wouldn't back down, and that pissed me off. I pulled myself away from him, and took my kids back to the play area.

He stayed in the same area for at least ten minutes. My wife then took a picture of him, so she could identify him to a police person. He then tried to confront her. I had both my children, so I again had to stay in control of my emotions, it was tough. finally I just said fuck it, I am going to my seat. My wife found a police officer and showed him the picture, it probably wasn't real good, but he said he would do his best to find him, and remove him from the park.

It is situations like this though, that after the fact you wonder what is really on this guys phone. How many pictures of kids were on his phone? How creepy would it be to find out their is a picture of your kids on the internet, photo shopped? Looking back on the situation we probably should have gotten a police officer earlier while he was still in "conversation" with myself.

It was an messed up situation, one that makes me wonder why I should ever put myself with in the masses again. Next time I will only partake in the suite level.

[GrnBay007]

Creepy!

Makes you wonder how much this type of thing happens without parents even noticing. Think of how many times you in crowded areas with your kids and would not even notice some weirdo taking a pic of your kids. Just think of how easy it would be at a place like Wisconsin Dells for instance with some weirdo who enjoys seeing kids in swimsuits. Ick.

[Freak Out]

Ever see the movie "Little Children" with Kate Winslet? Freaky....

[Brando19]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

[GrnBay007]

:lol: :lol:

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ever see the movie "Little Children" with Kate Winslet? Freaky....

I was only trying to cool off!

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

[packinpatland]

Somehow the camera strap would have found itself wound tightly around his neck..........................

[Brando19]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

I wouldn't? Try taking pics of my family, weirdo...and once again...quit replying to my fuckin posts. It's almost like you have a crush on me.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

I wouldn't? Try taking pics of my family, weirdo...and once again...quit replying to my fuckin posts. It's almost like you have a crush on me.

Really? You would assault someone for taking a picture of your family. That makes total sense.

[Brando19]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

I wouldn't? Try taking pics of my family, weirdo...and once again...quit replying to my fuckin posts. It's almost like you have a crush on me.

Really? You would assault someone for taking a picture of your family. That makes total sense.

You're an idiot. You really are...something is wrong with you.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

I wouldn't? Try taking pics of my family, weirdo...and once again...quit replying to my fuckin posts. It's almost like you have a crush on me.

Really? You would assault someone for taking a picture of your family. That makes total sense.

You're an idiot. You really are...something is wrong with you.

I'm an idiot? This coming from someone who would "beat the fuck" out of someone attempting to take a picture? That pretty much defines idiot.

[Brando19]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

I wouldn't? Try taking pics of my family, weirdo...and once again...quit replying to my fuckin posts. It's almost like you have a crush on me.

Really? You would assault someone for taking a picture of your family. That makes total sense.

You're an idiot. You really are...something is wrong with you.

I'm an idiot? This coming from someone who would "beat the fuck" out of someone attempting to take a picture? That pretty much defines idiot.

So you would let strangers take pics of your children for no reason? I'm pretty sure Nutz had a problem with it..as would I. Ty...I guess you're the type that's scared shitless and would tell your wife..."Honey, don't say nothing." Pussy.

[Joemailman]

Seems a bit odd, but I don't think there's much that can be done about someone taking pictures in a public place. There is no expectation of privacy of you're in a place with 40,000 people. I imagine it's up to the Brewers to decide if they're going to allow customers to bring in cameras. Not sure what beating the hell out of the guy would have accomplished, unless you want to get arrested in front of your kids.

[Brando19]

Seems a bit odd, but I don't think there's much that can be done about someone taking pictures in a public place. There is no expectation of privacy of you're in a place with 40,000 people. I imagine it's up to the Brewers to decide if they're going to allow customers to bring in cameras. Not sure what beating the hell out of the guy would have accomplished, unless you want to get arrested in front of your kids.

I wouldn't....I said it as a joke with the Mike Tyson reference....then ty had to be a dick as usual and got me all heated up. It really would piss me off just as it did Nutz, though. There's some sick bastards out there.

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

I wouldn't? Try taking pics of my family, weirdo...and once again...quit replying to my fuckin posts. It's almost like you have a crush on me.

Really? You would assault someone for taking a picture of your family. That makes total sense.

You're an idiot. You really are...something is wrong with you.

I'm an idiot? This coming from someone who would "beat the fuck" out of someone attempting to take a picture? That pretty much defines idiot.

So you would let strangers take pics of your children for no reason? I'm pretty sure Nutz had a problem with it..as would I. Ty...I guess you're the type that's scared shitless and would tell your wife..."Honey, don't say nothing." Pussy.

I see..there is a choice..letting them take pics or beating them up? What a false dichotomy you present.

I might ask why they were doing so, I might ask them to stop, i might alert security, etc.

I might not beat up someone who might be innocent, just because i felt the need to prove i'm a man. People take photos for all sorts of reasons....just because you think they are a pedo doesn't make it so.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

[Scott Campbell]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.


:lol:

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

[Brando19]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

[Scott Campbell]

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.




You seem such a sensitive soul all of a sudden. :lol:

I think you should tell on Ayn. He's naughty.

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Was he creepy or not?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Was he creepy or not?

Why? Didn't you already tell me that i argued he wasn't. When are you going to admit you are wrong.

You are asking me to deduce something from a posting. Ridiculous.

[Brando19]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.


You seriously have a crush on me. You're a weird man. I never called you a pedo...but you'd probably do some creepy shit if given the chance. You remind me of the weird guy in Hannibal that cut his own face off.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.




You seem such a sensitive soul all of a sudden. :lol:

I think you should tell on Ayn. He's naughty.

I already said it didnt' offend me...i just think that in a post about a guy who might have been a pedo..or might not have...in thread where most are saying they would hurt him...that it is awfully hypocritical to imply Ty is one.

Rand: He is suffering enough with Obama as president. :lol:

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.


You seriously have a crush on me. You're a weird man. I never called you a pedo...but you'd probably do some creepy shit if given the chance. You remind me of the weird guy in Hannibal that cut his own face off.

You are narcissistic. One post on yours outta of how many means i have a crush on you?

I was replying to rand...you had to get involved..and now you don't like my response. Man, you are a piece of work.

Let's see: you have called me an idiot, wierd, pussy, etc. Can't wait for you to cry to the admin..you are busted.

Why don't you get back to your sister.

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Was he creepy or not?

Why? Didn't you already tell me that i argued he wasn't. When are you going to admit you are wrong.

You are asking me to deduce something from a posting. Ridiculous.

Slippery as an eel, intellectually dishonest Bigguns. Did you think he was creepy or not? If not, you should have never suggested to us that you might be a pedophile. I only pointed out how self-contradictory your position was. Very Freudian of you to reveal yourself like that. Kinda like the 15th wonder thing. What is Bigguns (littleuns) really hiding?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Was he creepy or not?

Why? Didn't you already tell me that i argued he wasn't. When are you going to admit you are wrong.

You are asking me to deduce something from a posting. Ridiculous.

Slippery as an eel, intellectually dishonest Bigguns. Did you think he was creepy or not? If not, you should have never suggested to us that you might be a pedophile. I only pointed out how self-contradictory your position was. Very Freudian of you to reveal yourself like that. Kinda like the 15th wonder thing. What is Bigguns (littleuns) really hiding?

Slippery? Dude, you are the one making false arguments..claiming i made statements about his creepyness.

It doesn't matter to ty if he is creepy or not...Ty's position is that you don't assault folks for being creepy.

You can pretend all you want, but you made an insinuation.

What position? Please tell me the position i had prior to your initial post. Can't wait.

[Brando19]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.


You seriously have a crush on me. You're a weird man. I never called you a pedo...but you'd probably do some creepy shit if given the chance. You remind me of the weird guy in Hannibal that cut his own face off.

You are narcissistic. One post on yours outta of how many means i have a crush on you?

I was replying to rand...you had to get involved..and now you don't like my response. Man, you are a piece of work.

Let's see: you have called me an idiot, wierd, pussy, etc. Can't wait for you to cry to the admin..you are busted.

Why don't you get back to your sister.

You do have a crush on me...no Ty...I will NOT have sex with you. And I'm busy with your mom as we speak (your dad must not be very good at all....she's an animal!)

[falco]

I can't tell if we're having a philosophical debate or a third grade playground showdown here.

[Brando19]

I can't tell if we're having a philosophical debate or a third grade playground showdown here.

:lol: I'm telling the teacher....Ty's eating his own poo.......again.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

[quote:c939df51db="mraynrand"]I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.


You seriously have a crush on me. You're a weird man. I never called you a pedo...but you'd probably do some creepy shit if given the chance. You remind me of the weird guy in Hannibal that cut his own face off.

You are narcissistic. One post on yours outta of how many means i have a crush on you?

I was replying to rand...you had to get involved..and now you don't like my response. Man, you are a piece of work.

Let's see: you have called me an idiot, wierd, pussy, etc. Can't wait for you to cry to the admin..you are busted.

Why don't you get back to your sister.

You do have a crush on me...no Ty...I will NOT have sex with you. And I'm busy with your mom as we speak (your dad must not be very good at all....she's an animal!)[/quote:c939df51db]

This is so christian of you.

BTW, i'm sure your wife will not be happy to know that you are cheating on her with my mom as well as your sister.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I can't tell if we're having a philosophical debate or a third grade playground showdown here.

Picking the legs of a daddy longlegs.

[Brando19]

[quote:0b5f8600c4="Tyrone Bigguns"][quote:0b5f8600c4="mraynrand"]I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.


You seriously have a crush on me. You're a weird man. I never called you a pedo...but you'd probably do some creepy shit if given the chance. You remind me of the weird guy in Hannibal that cut his own face off.

You are narcissistic. One post on yours outta of how many means i have a crush on you?

I was replying to rand...you had to get involved..and now you don't like my response. Man, you are a piece of work.

Let's see: you have called me an idiot, wierd, pussy, etc. Can't wait for you to cry to the admin..you are busted.

Why don't you get back to your sister.

You do have a crush on me...no Ty...I will NOT have sex with you. And I'm busy with your mom as we speak (your dad must not be very good at all....she's an animal!)[/quote:0b5f8600c4]

This is so christian of you.

BTW, i'm sure your wife will not be happy to know that you are cheating on her with my mom as well as your sister.[/quote:0b5f8600c4]

No I don't think of sick shit like that....i leave that to pedos like you. Now for the last time....i will not make out with you. Quit flirting...and stalking...it's not working, homo!

[Tyrone Bigguns]

[quote:f79e75b354="mraynrand"][quote:f79e75b354="Tyrone Bigguns"][quote:f79e75b354="mraynrand"]I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.


You seriously have a crush on me. You're a weird man. I never called you a pedo...but you'd probably do some creepy shit if given the chance. You remind me of the weird guy in Hannibal that cut his own face off.

You are narcissistic. One post on yours outta of how many means i have a crush on you?

I was replying to rand...you had to get involved..and now you don't like my response. Man, you are a piece of work.

Let's see: you have called me an idiot, wierd, pussy, etc. Can't wait for you to cry to the admin..you are busted.

Why don't you get back to your sister.

You do have a crush on me...no Ty...I will NOT have sex with you. And I'm busy with your mom as we speak (your dad must not be very good at all....she's an animal!)[/quote:f79e75b354]

This is so christian of you.

BTW, i'm sure your wife will not be happy to know that you are cheating on her with my mom as well as your sister.[/quote:f79e75b354]

No I don't think of sick shit like that....i leave that to pedos like you. Now for the last time....i will not make out with you. Quit flirting...and stalking...it's not working, homo![/quote:f79e75b354]

Right. You just think of sick shit like Ty having sex with you, you fucking my mom, cuckholding my dad, etc.

Let's add homo and pedo now. Admin is going to be unhappy with you.

[falco]

Right. You just think of sick shit like Ty having sex with you, you fucking my mom, cuckholding my dad, etc.

Let's add homo and pedo now. Admin is going to be unhappy with you.

Did you mean cockholding, or cuckolding?

[Brando19]

Right. You just think of sick shit like Ty having sex with you, you fucking my mom, cuckholding my dad, etc.

Let's add homo and pedo now. Admin is going to be unhappy with you.

Did you mean cockholding, or cuckolding?


Ty, you started it. I wasn't even talking to you...I haven't talked to you since that Admin told us to quit. You, however, have commented BS to a few of my posts.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Right. You just think of sick shit like Ty having sex with you, you fucking my mom, cuckholding my dad, etc.

Let's add homo and pedo now. Admin is going to be unhappy with you.

Did you mean cockholding, or cuckolding?


Ty, you started it. I wasn't even talking to you...I haven't talked to you since that Admin told us to quit. You, however, have commented BS to a few of my posts.

Say what? A comment..."sure you would" is grounds for you to go off.

Get serious. I didn't insult you, your family, your home, WV, etc.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Right. You just think of sick shit like Ty having sex with you, you fucking my mom, cuckholding my dad, etc.

Let's add homo and pedo now. Admin is going to be unhappy with you.

Did you mean cockholding, or cuckolding?

No, i meant what i spelled.


cuckhold
A cuckhold, originating from various American slang, is a man whose wife has been "around the block"

[Brando19]

Right. You just think of sick shit like Ty having sex with you, you fucking my mom, cuckholding my dad, etc.

Let's add homo and pedo now. Admin is going to be unhappy with you.

Did you mean cockholding, or cuckolding?


Ty, you started it. I wasn't even talking to you...I haven't talked to you since that Admin told us to quit. You, however, have commented BS to a few of my posts.

Say what? A comment..."sure you would" is grounds for you to go off.

Get serious. I didn't insult you, your family, your home, WV, etc.

This has turned into a silly argument. Just silly. Haha...all of this because a guy took some pics of Nutz's kids. Sorry, Ty...shouldn't have fought with you.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Right. You just think of sick shit like Ty having sex with you, you fucking my mom, cuckholding my dad, etc.

Let's add homo and pedo now. Admin is going to be unhappy with you.

Did you mean cockholding, or cuckolding?


Ty, you started it. I wasn't even talking to you...I haven't talked to you since that Admin told us to quit. You, however, have commented BS to a few of my posts.

Say what? A comment..."sure you would" is grounds for you to go off.

Get serious. I didn't insult you, your family, your home, WV, etc.

This has turned into a silly argument. Just silly. Haha...all of this because a guy took some pics of Nutz's kids. Sorry, Ty...shouldn't have fought with you.

Not a problem. Issue solved thru PM.

Nothing to see here folks, move along.

[falco]

No, i meant what i spelled.


cuckhold
A cuckhold, originating from various American slang, is a man whose wife has been "around the block"

Think you might be wrong...

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cuckold

That or we are both right.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

No, i meant what i spelled.


cuckhold
A cuckhold, originating from various American slang, is a man whose wife has been "around the block"

Think you might be wrong...

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cuckold

That or we are both right.

Brothers be using:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cuckhold

[Scott Campbell]

I think I'm going to complain to the admin. The quality of the fights around here have really dropped off. Pathetic.

[Brando19]

I think I'm going to complain to the admin. The quality of the fights around here have really dropped off. Pathetic.

:lol: I'm spent. It's your turn. Maybe you and Bretsky can battle for a few rounds. I heard he said your dog wears combat boots.

[SnakeLH2006]

At least Jacko is gone.