PDA

View Full Version : OFFICIAL Packers @ Rams game thread



Pages : 1 [2] 3

pbmax
09-27-2009, 01:53 PM
Chillar also sucks cock.

And Hawk needs geometry lessons.
You think he might have heard that Stephen Jackson is big AND fast.

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 01:53 PM
Chillar also sucks cock.

Kinda looks like a knockout for waldo.

bobble, stay down, my god, stay down.

Brohm
09-27-2009, 01:53 PM
Running right by the RB again

pbmax
09-27-2009, 01:54 PM
chillar actually playing ss per jso
Not all the time. They are running him at SS with base personnel (Smith comes out) for expected runs. Not all of the bad plays have come with this package on the field.

MJZiggy
09-27-2009, 01:54 PM
Jiminy Christmas, people!!! A little defense, please!!

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 01:55 PM
boller was stopped until Stephen Jackson tackled him forward; once upon a time I thought that was illegal

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 01:55 PM
boller was stopped until Stephen Jackson tackled him forward; once upon a time I thought that was illegal

I was thinking the same thing.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 01:55 PM
please wake up and realize this isnt the greatest show on turf

pbmax
09-27-2009, 01:56 PM
Pickett saved that run. It was 20 if he doesn't get the leg. wist might be right today about the LBs.

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 01:56 PM
boller was stopped until Stephen Jackson tackled him forward; once upon a time I thought that was illegal

I was thinking the same thing.



either it's not illegal anymore or everybody just universally ignores it

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 01:56 PM
go for it :lol:

Partial
09-27-2009, 01:56 PM
Can't do PBP as it turns out. Boo.

This team is so flaky. The D carries them and the O sucks. Then, the D sucks and the O carries them. Terrible.

MJZiggy
09-27-2009, 01:57 PM
Jiminy Christmas, people!!! A little defense, please!!

Thank you.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 01:57 PM
I'll take the stop, but we need bigger badder D

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 01:57 PM
BOOOOOM

falco
09-27-2009, 01:58 PM
Can't do PBP as it turns out. Boo.


:(


:lol:

Partial
09-27-2009, 01:58 PM
Well, let's see if that accountability speech at halftime did anything. Let's go O.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 01:58 PM
We make good teams look great, average teams look good and bad teams look average.

pbmax
09-27-2009, 01:58 PM
For good luck.

http://imgsrv.qcountry1037.com/image/wqny/UserFiles/Image/faith_hill_high_boots.jpg

imscott72
09-27-2009, 01:58 PM
Yea like I said far from over..It wouldn't totally shock me if we blew this one..

pbmax
09-27-2009, 01:58 PM
BOOOOOM
Goes the dynamite?

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 01:59 PM
Our offense is coming out and taking over now; come on guys.

This is the Dam Rams and they are banged up.

Earth to the Packers

This is the Rams :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:00 PM
QB controversy in STL?

Cheesehead Craig
09-27-2009, 02:00 PM
This team is really missing Brandon Jackson

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:01 PM
QB controversy in STL?
You would think.

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:01 PM
the last thing the D needs now is a Packer 3 and out. got to put a drive together now or i'm afraid we'll be seeing stephen jackson running past our dbs the rest of the game.

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:01 PM
This team is really missing Brandon Jackson
If that is true then I will stop watching.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:01 PM
boller was stopped until Stephen Jackson tackled him forward; once upon a time I thought that was illegal

I was thinking the same thing.



either it's not illegal anymore or everybody just universally ignores it

Helping the runner is a 10y penalty. havent seen it enforced in long time.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:01 PM
This team is really missing Brandon Jackson

i agree

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:02 PM
Jordy! AHHHHHHH

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:02 PM
Damn, hang on to that wtf.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:02 PM
Jordy, he laid that in perfect for you. Good job splitting the coverage, but you have GOT to make that catch.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:02 PM
these drops are fucking lame

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
God Damned DROPS!

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
Slightly underthrown

Zool
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
I see Laurent Robinson is out with an ankle. Just picked that guy up this week. I am the kiss of death for WR's. Maybe I'll pickup and start a WR from whatever team the Packers play each week.

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
Double wow

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
Ugh, here come the drops.

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
2 drops and 3rd and 10. I know what is next.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
dammit jordy - had ar led him justa little bit more, that's 6. At least Jones can catch the ball :evil:

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
DROP JORDY NELSON

DROP JAMES JONES


DAMMIT

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
Turns out we don't have a 3rd WR. They both suck cock.

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
Jones hurt.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:03 PM
sloppy

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
dammit jordy - had ar led him justa little bit more, that's 6. At least Jones can catch the ball :evil:

Woops :P

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
Turns out we don't have a 3rd WR. They both suck cock.


SO DOES WASTING A DAM TIMEOUT

I can handle physical screw ups

But the Mental Shit is inexcusable

Losing that timeout worked out great last week

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
This team is really missing Brandon Jackson

i agree

Team really misses eric torkelson

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
2 drops and 3rd and 10. I know what is next.

4 yard pass or 2 yard run.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
Big third down here. My guess is they F it up. Here's hoping I'm wrong.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
dammit jordy - had ar led him justa little bit more, that's 6. At least Jones can catch the ball :evil:

Woops :P

"Sarcasm"!!

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
Turns out we don't have a 3rd WR. They both suck cock.
I am sure Jones has a secret College injury history that Thompson ignored despite the fact that everyone knows he was an injury risk.

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
Our offense is coming out and taking over now; come on guys.

This is the Dam Rams and they are banged up.

Earth to the Packers

This is the Rams :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:

Let's not forget how good we made the Bengals look last week..

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
Everyone bitch all you want at McCarthy of TT, but the fucken players need to own up and perform.

The pack has a bunch of freakin lame ass mental softies on the team.

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:05 PM
2 drops and 3rd and 10. I know what is next.

4 yard pass or 2 yard run.

Dump Arod, insert tolzien!!!!

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:05 PM
what's happened to dink and dunk and passes to the backs?

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:05 PM
Turns out we don't have a 3rd WR. They both suck cock.


SO DOES WASTING A DAM TIMEOUT

I can handle physical screw ups

But the Mental Shit is inexcusable

Losing that timeout worked out great last week

qft

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:05 PM
The pack has a bunch of freakin lame ass mental softies on the team.

Which is odd considering MM was suppose to be a hard-nosed Pitt guy..

pbmax
09-27-2009, 02:05 PM
Turns out we don't have a 3rd WR. They both suck cock.


SO DOES WASTING A DAM TIMEOUT

I can handle physical screw ups

But the Mental Shit is inexcusable

Losing that timeout worked out great last week
Is Swain active? Losing Jones to sideline might have screwed up that sub package.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:06 PM
without ruvell, we just dont have any team chemistry

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:06 PM
Everyone bitch all you want at McCarthy of TT, but the fucken players need to own up and perform.

The pack has a bunch of freakin lame ass mental softies on the team.


TT brought them here :wink:

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:06 PM
what's happened to dink and dunk and passes to the backs?

Don't know, but I'm pretty fed up with the play calling and passing decisions.

Empty backfield, what a surprise they blitzed like hell. Christ.

Rams are gonna pull ahead right here.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:06 PM
2 drops and 3rd and 10. I know what is next.

4 yard pass or 2 yard run.

Dump Arod, insert tolzien!!!!

he was en fuego yesterday.

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:06 PM
Great idea; let's let a guy come up the middle unblocked

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:07 PM
a defensive score would be great here

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:07 PM
Ok... settle down. get a turnover here.

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:07 PM
what's happened to dink and dunk and passes to the backs?

They're too busy playing tackle.

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:07 PM
Man o man this O line. Everyone and their grandma's know all you have to do is blitz this line and they crumble.

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:07 PM
good luck defence. barely had time to catch your breath. let's hope you get a turnover.

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:08 PM
Ok. Can we finally put to rest the absurd notion that we had the best and deepest receiving core.

Ty isn't down on the receivers, just a bit more realistic than some. Shout out to my pal bobble who had my back on this.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:08 PM
Again, great protection. You have Well & Spitz blockin a big fat tackle while no one bothers to chuck the LB coming up the middle. NICE! :evil:

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:08 PM
good luck defence. barely had time to catch your breath. let's hope you get a turnover.

Yep, but everyone will still blame them despite the O going most of the first half sucking it up averaging 1.6 yards per play.

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:09 PM
Popps with the uber contaiment....

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:09 PM
spy please

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:10 PM
Thank god Poppinga didn't get pulled inside... :oops:

woodbuck27
09-27-2009, 02:10 PM
3rd Quarter

San Fran 14 - Minnesota 13

3-3-MIN 47 (9:31) (Shotgun) B.Favre pass deep middle intended for B.Berrian INTERCEPTED by S.Spencer at SF 37. S.Spencer to SF 39 for 2 yards (S.Rice).

Favre's first pick of 2009 season.

Favre 13 of 28 with 1 TD and 1 Pick (2 sacks)

The San Fran 'D' has the Vikings 'O' confused. The Vikings look ripe for the picking. On the next series the 49ers come up with a FG.

San Fran 17 - Minnesota 13. ( 4:47 remains in 3rd Qtr.)

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:10 PM
good luck defence. barely had time to catch your breath. let's hope you get a turnover.

Yep, but everyone will still blame them despite the O going most of the first half sucking it up averaging 1.6 yards per play.

I don't think we've blamed the defense once yet this year P.

bbbffl66
09-27-2009, 02:10 PM
Anyone else being hit by that falling sky? :shock:

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:10 PM
Nice play by Hawk. Anybody else love the old oiler jerseys? Best uni's in sports.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:10 PM
Great pursiot by Hawk! nice tackle

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:10 PM
3rd Quarter

San Fran 14 - Minnesota 13

3-3-MIN 47 (9:31) (Shotgun) B.Favre pass deep middle intended for B.Berrian INTERCEPTED by S.Spencer at SF 37. S.Spencer to SF 39 for 2 yards (S.Rice).

Favre's first pick of 2009 season.

Favre 13 of 28 with 1 TD and 1 Pick (2 sacks)

The San Fran 'D' has the Vikings 'O' confused. The Vikings look ripe for the picking.


now thats good luck!

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:11 PM
this is a packer game day thread...

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:11 PM
Ok. Can we finally put to rest the absurd notion that we had the best and deepest receiving core.

Ty isn't down on the receivers, just a bit more realistic than some. Shout out to my pal bobble who had my back on this.



DITTO

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:11 PM
Nice stand D.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:11 PM
Nice stop by the D. Time for the offense to eat some time off th clock with a nice drive


Oops,

best guess after the great punt by the Rams:
run run pass punt

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:12 PM
good luck defence. barely had time to catch your breath. let's hope you get a turnover.

Yep, but everyone will still blame them despite the O going most of the first half sucking it up averaging 1.6 yards per play.

I don't think we've blamed the defense once yet this year P.

BS. The blame has not been on the QB and coach who deserve 99% of it thus far.

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:12 PM
3rd Quarter

San Fran 14 - Minnesota 13

3-3-MIN 47 (9:31) (Shotgun) B.Favre pass deep middle intended for B.Berrian INTERCEPTED by S.Spencer at SF 37. S.Spencer to SF 39 for 2 yards (S.Rice).

Favre's first pick of 2009 season.

Favre 13 of 28 with 1 TD and 1 Pick (2 sacks)

The San Fran 'D' has the Vikings 'O' confused. The Vikings look ripe for the picking.

That pick wasn't even close to being favre's fault. Berrian should of caught it and it was tipped..

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:12 PM
loooooooooong field to go...

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:12 PM
good luck defence. barely had time to catch your breath. let's hope you get a turnover.

Yep, but everyone will still blame them despite the O going most of the first half sucking it up averaging 1.6 yards per play.

I don't think we've blamed the defense once yet this year P.

Ty does...defense or tt. :wink:

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:12 PM
Ouch...

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:12 PM
I'll take a 15 play, 7 min, 95+ yard TD drive,

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:12 PM
here comes a two yard run on first down.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:13 PM
Very surprised we had a stop after the D was sucking wind since the offense sucks so much balls.

They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:13 PM
Which is worse, our run blocking or our pass protection...

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:13 PM
98 yard drive here we go....

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:13 PM
Colledge out??

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:14 PM
Time for a crack block on dipshit.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:14 PM
Colledge out??

He's back in now.

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:14 PM
it's run for two or throw deep. same as last year. geesh!!

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:14 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

Freak Out
09-27-2009, 02:14 PM
Hard to believe were letting the freaking Rams hang around this thing......sad.

]{ilr]3
09-27-2009, 02:14 PM
this oline seriously sucks. no pass protection and no run blocking

PackerTimer
09-27-2009, 02:14 PM
What happened to the short passes?

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:15 PM
Driver is always being double covered. How on earth is this not opening the other receivers?

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:15 PM
finally jordy shows some hands

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:15 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:15 PM
Driver is always being double covered. How on earth is this not opening the other receivers?

I think Jennings is banged up too and has not been the same player since the injury in the AZ game. Really he has only one good play in three games. Not good for your offensive star.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:16 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

STFU

Great throw from Rodfgers to Nelson

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:16 PM
maybe some rhythm starting here? Where the f is finley?

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:16 PM
Nice Catch Jordy

Man, I was just watching the Pats game on Direct TV; it's unbelievable how many times Randy Moss just bails Tom Brady out in key situations

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:16 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:17 PM
maybe some rhythm starting here? Where the f is finley?

To tell the truth, I haven't even seen him on the field much today.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:17 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

STFU

Great throw from Rodfgers to Nelson

Very low. They were lucky. And that is ignoring several really bad passes before that.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:17 PM
Quick hit pass plays. They seem to have a rhythm going now

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:17 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:18 PM
2nd and 15 with an empty back field. WTF. Stop with this empty backfield shotgun BS.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:18 PM
finally a drive and of course a hold...

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:18 PM
Nice Catch Jordy

Man, I was just watching the Pats game on Direct TV; it's unbelievable how many times Randy Moss just bails Tom Brady out in key situations

my directv is taking too long on channel changes, trying to keep on eye on detroit / washington (from where I lived to where i live!) but fox audio is painful

woodbuck27
09-27-2009, 02:18 PM
3rd Quarter

San Fran 14 - Minnesota 13

3-3-MIN 47 (9:31) (Shotgun) B.Favre pass deep middle intended for B.Berrian INTERCEPTED by S.Spencer at SF 37. S.Spencer to SF 39 for 2 yards (S.Rice).

Favre's first pick of 2009 season.

Favre 13 of 28 with 1 TD and 1 Pick (2 sacks)

The San Fran 'D' has the Vikings 'O' confused. The Vikings look ripe for the picking.

That pick wasn't even close to being favre's fault. Berrian should of caught it and it was tipped..

OK. I'm just watching the days action on NFL.COM.

PackerTimer
09-27-2009, 02:18 PM
Effing holding call puts us in a hole again.

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:18 PM
Driver is always being double covered. How on earth is this not opening the other receivers?

I think Jennings is banged up too and has not been the same player since the injury in the AZ game. Really he has only one good play in three games. Not good for your offensive star.

I agree, something is definitely very wrong..

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:19 PM
Guess they are calling illegal contact today

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:19 PM
Always bombs. Need to hit some intermediate stuff, where is our TE advantage?

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:19 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

And now we rejoin the argument from last week...

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:19 PM
wow bush made a positive play on st

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:19 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

He has some drops, sure, but who doesn't? Maybe he should work on his balls' catchability. He also was bailed out by his receivers on multiple occasions (low pass to Jordy).

Yet another inaccurate, deep pass and punt.

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:19 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Dominate. Cmon. You are heading off into one of your patented partial death spirals.

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:20 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?


I only recall two...one by Jones and one by Nelson

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:20 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:20 PM
Bishop in at LB. First play, guesses wrong on run and shoots thew wrong gap

ThunderDan
09-27-2009, 02:20 PM
How is that not defensive pass interference on Jennings route? The safety runs into Jennings to bump him off of his route!

falco
09-27-2009, 02:20 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

He has some drops, sure, but who doesn't? He also was bailed out by his receivers on multiple occasions (low pass to Jordy).

Yet another inaccurate, deep pass and punt.

the pass was on, jennings ran into the defender. you're a cock.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:21 PM
1 for 8 on 3rd down...

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:21 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:21 PM
maybe some rhythm starting here? Where the f is finley?

To tell the truth, I haven't even seen him on the field much today.

I don't understand this either. It's well documented that the Rams have let TE's torch them over and over yet ours are nowhere to be found..

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:22 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

He has some drops, sure, but who doesn't? He also was bailed out by his receivers on multiple occasions (low pass to Jordy).

Yet another inaccurate, deep pass and punt.

the pass was on, jennings ran into the defender. you're a cock.

I'm a cock because I call things as they are? Can't deny 1 for 8 on third downs, either... The D is sucking wind because the O cannot sustain a drive. Things keep going this way and they will lose again.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:22 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

He has some drops, sure, but who doesn't? He also was bailed out by his receivers on multiple occasions (low pass to Jordy).

Yet another inaccurate, deep pass and punt.

the pass was on, jennings ran into the defender. you're a cock.

I'm a cock because I call things as they are? Can't deny 1 for 8 on third downs, either...

no, you're just a cock in general. and i think very little of you for it.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:23 PM
packers should have put the rams away a long time ago.

can't keep relying on long bombs...

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:23 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:23 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

He has some drops, sure, but who doesn't? He also was bailed out by his receivers on multiple occasions (low pass to Jordy).

Yet another inaccurate, deep pass and punt.

the pass was on, jennings ran into the defender. you're a cock.

I'm a cock because I call things as they are? Can't deny 1 for 8 on third downs, either...

no, you're just a cock in general. and i think very little of you for it.

Okay.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:23 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

He has some drops, sure, but who doesn't? He also was bailed out by his receivers on multiple occasions (low pass to Jordy).

Yet another inaccurate, deep pass and punt.

the pass was on, jennings ran into the defender. you're a cock.

I'm a cock because I call things as they are? Can't deny 1 for 8 on third downs, either...

If you're calling things as they are, at least admit that Jennings route was impeded after the ball was already in the air. It should have been called but wasn't.

PackerTimer
09-27-2009, 02:24 PM
Ok we get another stop. Maybe the offense can make something of it finally.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:24 PM
grant is picking up steam. need better playcalling. more RG

falco
09-27-2009, 02:25 PM
i have not been impressed with MM since sometime in the second half of the 2007 season.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:25 PM
MM needs to call shorter drops and quicker shorter passes to get this O going. They don't get things going when everything is going deep.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:25 PM
Nice cutback by Grant there.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:25 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:26 PM
On a side note the Bucs have 35 total yards against the Giants in the 4th quarter.. :shock:

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:26 PM
Rodgers does not throw the ball accurately anymore. I think he is hurt. Or just not that good. But probably hurt.

11 of 19 w/ 3+ drops?

He has some drops, sure, but who doesn't? He also was bailed out by his receivers on multiple occasions (low pass to Jordy).

Yet another inaccurate, deep pass and punt.

the pass was on, jennings ran into the defender. you're a cock.

I'm a cock because I call things as they are? Can't deny 1 for 8 on third downs, either... The D is sucking wind because the O cannot sustain a drive. Things keep going this way and they will lose again.

Your a cock, because you use every little issue as a means to try and push your fucked up beliefs. Like some fuck that sells tv's knows anything about football. Lose the I know everything about everything attitude. That shit is reserved for teenagers. You know just as little as all of us do.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:26 PM
what? peterson is better than grant??? get out of here. :roll:

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:26 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:26 PM
we do fine on the up the gut runs...keep running them...when we need to run. i think we've run on first down every possession except one. can you say predictable?!

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:26 PM
Bert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:27 PM
Dang does Percy Harvin look good so far though

ThunderDan
09-27-2009, 02:27 PM
Where is our West Cost Offense? Let's hit the slants.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
Nice shot on the move :shock:

falco
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
boy, jennings sucks, doesn't he partial.... lol

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
JAX - HOU have a good one going. HOU's red uniforms look like a 4 year old's pajamas - wonder if they've got a flap in the back that snaps shut...

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
So in lieu of play-by-play, we get more asinine trolling? Gee thanks Partial.

There's plenty to criticize on this team without your confabulation.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
Finally. Atta boy J and ARod.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:28 PM
oh, and rodgers isn't accurate.... :roll:

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate?

You tell me. You're the one that said he would dominate behind our line. I don't agree with you. I don't care how much skill your RB has, if the line blows then so will his stats. It's a little hard to judge Grant when the line play is so poor. When there's no blocking what's he suppose to do run through 3-4 guys there waiting for him?

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
Wells misse the block, three yards deep in the backfield

falco
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
Finally. Atta boy J and ARod.

this.... partial goes as the wind blows....

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.


I think Minnesota has a much better OL and I think you'd be challenged to find many that would argue with that.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?

Wasn't it 8 prior to today? ARod has brought at least half of the sacks on himself imo.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
Bert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.

Just threw a rocket on 3rd &12 then ran down field for a pointless block.

pasquale
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
haha...i liked rodger's little DD impression there

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:30 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.

We have an inferior LT in Colledge, a below average guard in Spitz, and an average center in Wells. And that's the way it's gonna be for another month. Now you know.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:30 PM
rodgers now our leading rusher in the game.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:30 PM
Finally. Atta boy J and ARod.

this.... partial goes as the wind blows....

What does this even mean? I call it as I see it. I'm happy for a good play. Why wouldn't I be? Because I think the team isn't spectacular I shouldn't be happy for a big play?

This makes absolutely zero sense. Please explain how this makes any sense at all.

woodbuck27
09-27-2009, 02:30 PM
Awesome! Greg Jennings is over 100 yards.

I was shocked that he had no receptions Vs the Bengals.

MOBB DEEP
09-27-2009, 02:30 PM
Bert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.

Just threw a rocket on 3rd &12 then ran down field for a pointless block.

AWESOME effort on the block son

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:31 PM
nice play call. First Draw I have seen in a while

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:31 PM
ARod jacked up :D

falco
09-27-2009, 02:31 PM
Finally. Atta boy J and ARod.

this.... partial goes as the wind blows....

What does this even mean? I call it as I see it. I'm happy for a good play. Why wouldn't I be? Because I think the team isn't spectacular I shouldn't be happy for a big play?

This makes absolutely zero sense. Please explain how this makes any sense at all.

you'll figure it out one day.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:31 PM
haha...i liked rodger's little DD impression there

missed it.. oh there it is!!

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:31 PM
Arod TD!!

Tony Oday
09-27-2009, 02:32 PM
missed an XP!

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:32 PM
Missed XP :shock:

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:32 PM
Jeez... need that pat.

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:32 PM
had to have a td there. great!!!! points are good any way you can get them. crosby missed the pat? ouch!

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:32 PM
So in lieu of play-by-play, we get more asinine trolling? Gee thanks Partial.

There's plenty to criticize on this team without your confabulation.

The Confabulist!!!

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:32 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.


I think Minnesota has a much better OL and I think you'd be challenged to find many that would argue with that.

Agree to disagree I guess.

Clifton is still great. I'll give you he is injured. He is much better than McKinney.

Without a doubt Hutch is better than Colledge, but Colledge is still solid. Great versus very good. I'm okay with that.

Spitz is a border-line pro-bowl player at center. He's very good and I imagine he is much better than the first year starter at center for Minne. Again, I really have no idea, though.

Sitton is a solid, big nasty RG. I don't even know who Minne's RG is so I would like to hear Ras' opinion on the matter.

Isn't Ryan Cook starting at RT and isn't he horrible? We'll see. Otherwise Phil Loadholdt the Rook is probably starting. Barbre sucks.

Iron Mike
09-27-2009, 02:32 PM
Brent would never have run that in by himself.

MOBB DEEP
09-27-2009, 02:33 PM
rodgers now our leading rusher in the game.

crazy

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:33 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.

We have an inferior LT in Colledge, a below average guard in Spitz, and an average center in Wells. And that's the way it's gonna be for another month. Now you know.

Injuries happen. Grant wasn't doing anything with our starting line with a stud LT, a very good guard and a very good center, so...

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:33 PM
Bert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.

Just threw a rocket on 3rd &12 then ran down field for a pointless block.

AWESOME effort on the block son

40 yr old, hurt bicep, pointless as receiver was being tackled.

MOBB DEEP
09-27-2009, 02:33 PM
Brent would never have run that in by himself.

:roll:

PackerTimer
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
A missed extra point. God it's a good thing we're playing the Rams. I hope this team is better than they've looked the last few weeks. I'm really keeping my fingers crossed that this is some kind of extended slump.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
Brent would never have run that in by himself.

He needs those TD passes.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
Brent would never have run that in by himself. not in the later part of his career, but early on, certainly

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?

Wasn't it 8 prior to today? ARod has brought at least half of the sacks on himself imo.

And, of course, all of bert's are his line's fault. You are a piece of work.

MOBB DEEP
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
Bert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.

Just threw a rocket on 3rd &12 then ran down field for a pointless block.

AWESOME effort on the block son

40 yr old, hurt bicep, pointless as receiver was being tackled.

Play til whistle

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
rodgers now our leading rusher in the game.

crazy

Why is that crazy?

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
Nice drive, now let's make a play here D and get this game outta hand.

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:35 PM
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?

Wasn't it 8 prior to today? ARod has brought at least half of the sacks on himself imo.

And, of course, all of bert's are his line's fault. You are a piece of work.

Never did I say this. I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue. Stop with your bullshit agenda.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:35 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.

We have an inferior LT in Colledge, a below average guard in Spitz, and an average center in Wells. And that's the way it's gonna be for another month. Now you know.

Injuries happen. Grant wasn't doing anything with our starting line with a stud LT, a very good guard and a very good center, so...

Clifton never has been and never will be a good run blocker. So, if your judging based on Grant's production, Clifton is far from elite.

Oh, and you're certifiably crazy if you think Spitz is a PRO BOWL caliber center.

ThunderDan
09-27-2009, 02:36 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.

We have an inferior LT in Colledge, a below average guard in Spitz, and an average center in Wells. And that's the way it's gonna be for another month. Now you know.

Injuries happen. Grant wasn't doing anything with our starting line with a stud LT, a very good guard and a very good center, so...

Clifton has run block like a girl for years!!!! How is that a stud? He was a superior pass blocker but never in the run game! A one demension T is not a stud!!!

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:36 PM
Bert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.

Just threw a rocket on 3rd &12 then ran down field for a pointless block.

AWESOME effort on the block son

40 yr old, hurt bicep, pointless as receiver was being tackled.

Play til whistle

I respect him and he'll be my fav player - ever. But he's losing his mind.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:36 PM
[quote:9b7f84ba7a="Partial"]

They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?

Wasn't it 8 prior to today? ARod has brought at least half of the sacks on himself imo.

And, of course, all of bert's are his line's fault. You are a piece of work.

Never did I say this. I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue. Stop with your bullshit agenda.[/quote:9b7f84ba7a]

says pot to kettle :lol:

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:36 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

MOBB DEEP
09-27-2009, 02:36 PM
rodgers now our leading rusher in the game.

crazy

Why is that crazy?

Uhhhhh, he's the QB not the RB...??

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:36 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.

We have an inferior LT in Colledge, a below average guard in Spitz, and an average center in Wells. And that's the way it's gonna be for another month. Now you know.

Injuries happen. Grant wasn't doing anything with our starting line with a stud LT, a very good guard and a very good center, so...

Clifton never has been and never will be a good run blocker. So, if your judging based on Grant's production, Clifton is far from elite.

Oh, and you're certifiably crazy if you think Spits is a PRO BOWL caliber center.

I agree Clifton isn't a superb run blocker but how many LT's are? Is McKinney? I have no idea but I doubt it as he's known for quick feet and being a pass protector.

Bob McGinn wrote an article (I think) saying Spitz was taking a step to the next level and is very good. I guess you know more than the professionals, right? Spitz is very, very solid as I understand it.

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:37 PM
Bert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.

Just threw a rocket on 3rd &12 then ran down field for a pointless block.

14 of 30, 1 td, 1 int....best back in the nfl, just think what he could do with our line. Poor Bert.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:37 PM
Good read there by Bishop. Sniffed that out well.

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:37 PM
Less pack on pack crime please!!! we almost need a troll in here to beat on for a while

Bretsky
09-27-2009, 02:37 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.


I think Minnesota has a much better OL and I think you'd be challenged to find many that would argue with that.

Agree to disagree I guess.

Clifton is still great. I'll give you he is injured. He is much better than McKinney.

Without a doubt Hutch is better than Colledge, but Colledge is still solid. Great versus very good. I'm okay with that.

Spitz is a border-line pro-bowl player at center. He's very good and I imagine he is much better than the first year starter at center for Minne. Again, I really have no idea, though.

Sitton is a solid, big nasty RG. I don't even know who Minne's RG is so I would like to hear Ras' opinion on the matter.

Isn't Ryan Cook starting at RT and isn't he horrible? We'll see. Otherwise Phil Loadholdt the Rook is probably starting. Barbre sucks.


Come on Partial; we agree on a lot of things but to say our OL is as good as the Vikings is foolish IMO.

At this point in his career Clifton is no better than McKinney; but saying he is is important to your argument because it might be the only position we are as good as they are at. Spitz is nowhere near Pro Bowl caliber at G or at Center. Wells is sub par. Sitton is nasty but not good enough yet. College is decent.

We are average at best
They are solid at worst and dominant at best

I have a hard time believing many would call our OL solid at this point

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:37 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:38 PM
I agree Clifton isn't a superb run blocker but how many LT's are? Is McKinney? I have no idea..

If you have no idea then stop arguing as though you do.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:38 PM
good - a few stops by the D in a row.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:38 PM
Bishop has been playing for Barnett this half

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:39 PM
Is detroit gonna win a game?

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:39 PM
Ugly f'ing ST play again. Bush again....

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:39 PM
[quote:1b92c01842="Partial"]

They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?

Wasn't it 8 prior to today? ARod has brought at least half of the sacks on himself imo.

And, of course, all of bert's are his line's fault. You are a piece of work.

Never did I say this. I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue. Stop with your bullshit agenda.[/quote:1b92c01842]

http://static.footballguys.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/laughing.gif You are something else P...

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:39 PM
I agree Clifton isn't a superb run blocker but how many LT's are? Is McKinney? I have no idea..

If you have no idea then stop arguing as though you do.

Who even brought up the OL? OL is irrelevant. Packer's OL is good enough to win. Grant sucks. That is the story.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:39 PM
Bush holding on the punt return. Guy is awesome man! :roll:

falco
09-27-2009, 02:39 PM
even if we win this game, it does not give us much to be hopeful for.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:39 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

Grant's sucktitude has NOTHING to do with the line. Okay.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:40 PM
I say again - smith over bush? really??

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:40 PM
do you think we'll run on first down again?

SkinBasket
09-27-2009, 02:40 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.


I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

That was like 5 minutes ago for fuck's sake. Take your bullshit shit-stirring somewhere else please.

Tyrone Bigguns
09-27-2009, 02:40 PM
I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.


I think Minnesota has a much better OL and I think you'd be challenged to find many that would argue with that.

Agree to disagree I guess.

Clifton is still great. I'll give you he is injured. He is much better than McKinney.

Without a doubt Hutch is better than Colledge, but Colledge is still solid. Great versus very good. I'm okay with that.

Spitz is a border-line pro-bowl player at center. He's very good and I imagine he is much better than the first year starter at center for Minne. Again, I really have no idea, though.

Sitton is a solid, big nasty RG. I don't even know who Minne's RG is so I would like to hear Ras' opinion on the matter.

Isn't Ryan Cook starting at RT and isn't he horrible? We'll see. Otherwise Phil Loadholdt the Rook is probably starting. Barbre sucks.

Ty loves how you tell it like it is regarding Arod...and then come up with doozies like Clifton is still great and better than McKinney, Spitz borderline pro bowl...yep, first year starting at center, sitton is solid...first year starting.

Key line:Again, I really have no idea, though.

pasquale
09-27-2009, 02:40 PM
if you want to debate packers vs vikes OL, start a thread about it.

talk about the damn game.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:41 PM
TD 9ers!

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:41 PM
Nice run by Grant. Actually stayed up after contact.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:41 PM
need to keep pounding it

PackerTimer
09-27-2009, 02:42 PM
I'm also watching the Vikings game right now, Vernon Davis is a beast today.

]{ilr]3
09-27-2009, 02:42 PM
I agree Clifton isn't a superb run blocker but how many LT's are? Is McKinney? I have no idea..

If you have no idea then stop arguing as though you do.

Who even brought up the OL? OL is irrelevant. Packer's OL is good enough to win. Grant sucks. That is the story.

grant does what he is told to. make one cut and run down hill. i dont blame him for a shitty line and bad play calling

falco
09-27-2009, 02:42 PM
need to keep pounding it

see

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:42 PM
Another nice run by Grant.

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
Damn, I think that's the first long run this year that was not called back :shock:

gbgary
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
as i said earlier...quick hitters up the middle.

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
I agree Clifton isn't a superb run blocker but how many LT's are? Is McKinney? I have no idea..

If you have no idea then stop arguing as though you do.

Who even brought up the OL? OL is irrelevant. Packer's OL is good enough to win. Grant sucks. That is the story.

http://static.footballguys.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/bs.gif Now you're just fishing for attention. I'm not even going to entertain this.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
i guess it only takes 3 quarters for our bombs to set up the run game

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
Follow up not so hot :P

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

Grant's sucktitude has NOTHING to do with the line. Okay.

When has he ever made a big play except when he had all-world talent around him led by Brett?? He hasn't made a play in two years. Last year it was "injury excuses". This year it is??? He gets to the second level often but never makes anyone miss and runs anyone over. He's just a guy.

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
grant is picking up steam. need better playcalling. more RG

more please - run some clock and get some 1st downs

woodbuck27
09-27-2009, 02:43 PM
San Fran 24 - Minnesota 20 with 8:12 remain. in 4th Qtr.

What could that mean? :D

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:44 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.


I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

That was like 5 minutes ago for fuck's sake. Take your bullshit shit-stirring somewhere else please.

Someone else brought it up as an excuse, not me. That is the point. Stop with your stupid ass agenda.

Sparkey
09-27-2009, 02:44 PM
Wynn had a hole to his right and missed it.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:44 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

Grant's sucktitude has NOTHING to do with the line. Okay.

When has he ever made a big play except when he had all-world talent around him led by Brett?? He hasn't made a play in two years. Last year it was "injury excuses". This year it is??? He gets to the second level often but never makes anyone miss and runs anyone over. He's just a guy.

Whatever you say P. You are obviously a better judge of things than the rest of us are.

falco
09-27-2009, 02:44 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

Grant's sucktitude has NOTHING to do with the line. Okay.

When has he ever made a big play except when he had all-world talent around him led by Brett?? He hasn't made a play in two years. Last year it was "injury excuses". This year it is??? He gets to the second level often but never makes anyone miss and runs anyone over. He's just a guy.

lool

imscott72
09-27-2009, 02:44 PM
San Fran 24 - Minnesota 20 with 8:12 remain. in 4th Qtr.

What could that mean? :D

It means the Vikings will come back and win..

Fosco33
09-27-2009, 02:45 PM
1 for 9. sad

Brohm
09-27-2009, 02:45 PM
1/9 on 3rd down conversions :(

MichiganPackerFan
09-27-2009, 02:45 PM
San Fran 24 - Minnesota 20 with 8:12 remain. in 4th Qtr.

What could that mean? :D

It means the Vikings will come back and win..

just adds drama to next week

Partial
09-27-2009, 02:46 PM
I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

Grant's sucktitude has NOTHING to do with the line. Okay.

When has he ever made a big play except when he had all-world talent around him led by Brett?? He hasn't made a play in two years. Last year it was "injury excuses". This year it is??? He gets to the second level often but never makes anyone miss and runs anyone over. He's just a guy.

Whatever you say P. You are obviously a better judge of things than the rest of us are.

I'm asking you a question that if you cannot answer, then you LOSE the argument.

When has Grant made a single big play since 2007? Even average players get lucky and make a big play. I haven't seen this guy make more than one or two big plays in the past two seasons. You tell me.

He averaged 3.9 yards per carry last year. Horrible.

He is averaging 3.6 yards per carry this year.

You tell me where there is anything more than a shitty player who gets to the second level frequently and then fucks it up.

Gunakor
09-27-2009, 02:46 PM
Oh SOB.

Kampinos does what Kampinos does. He drops the ball inside the 10 and spins it back, but our damn coverage team can't kill it until it comes all the way back to the 15.