PDA

View Full Version : Official Packers-Seahawks Thread



Pages : 1 [2]

OkayKyle
12-27-2009, 01:51 PM
Is there a way to find out how many games the Pack has received the kickoff to start the game? It has felt like it's been nearly every game that the Packers have started the game on offense. Can someone check on this?

pbmax
12-27-2009, 01:53 PM
so far so good

we're winning big, and giants are losing big
JINX!

Fred's Slacks
12-27-2009, 01:53 PM
Is there a way to find out how many games the Pack has received the kickoff to start the game? It has felt like it's been nearly every game that the Packers have started the game on offense. Can someone check on this?

I was thinking about posting that exact same question. We have an uncanny ability to win the opening toss. It seems that we rarely do anything with the opening possesion so in a way it's like kicking off to start both halfs. I'd like to see us defer to the second half.

Brohm
12-27-2009, 01:54 PM
BUSH with a play :shock:

pbmax
12-27-2009, 01:54 PM
Bush! Keeps his job for another week!

gbgary
12-27-2009, 01:54 PM
bush...great coverage and fight for the ball

imscott72
12-27-2009, 01:54 PM
Bush with a pick? Shit he prob just made the team next year.. :roll:

Fred's Slacks
12-27-2009, 01:54 PM
Jarrett Bush makes a play!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !

Bossman641
12-27-2009, 01:54 PM
You know things are going well when Bush gets a pick

TravisWilliams23
12-27-2009, 01:55 PM
Maybe a sign of things to come?

OkayKyle
12-27-2009, 01:55 PM
OMG Bush got his head around BEFORE the ball got there, it hit him in the hands AND he caught it!!!! OMG OMG OMG

pbmax
12-27-2009, 01:55 PM
But they kept talking about kicking the field goal since it was third down........

Yeah, I don't know what they were talking about. Billick can have some "duh" moments in the booth. I'm guessing he had some of that on the sidelines too.

Anyway, I agree with you. It was well managed by the Pack to get a shot at the touchdown and come away with 3 and no time left.
He does generally allow himself to be corrected instead of just pretending like it never happened like Michaels would do with Madden.

packer4life
12-27-2009, 01:55 PM
BUSH FOR PRESIDENT...

clarification: JARRETT bush for pres hehe

Fred's Slacks
12-27-2009, 01:55 PM
Maybe a sign of things to come?

:lol:

You're joking right?

pbmax
12-27-2009, 01:56 PM
Maybe a sign of things to come?
Yes. The Apocalypse.

TravisWilliams23
12-27-2009, 01:56 PM
Maybe a sign of things to come?

:lol:

You're joking right?

Praying :lol:

imscott72
12-27-2009, 01:57 PM
I hate to say it, but after watching the replay of the pick, Bush really played it well..

Fred's Slacks
12-27-2009, 01:57 PM
But they kept talking about kicking the field goal since it was third down........

Yeah, I don't know what they were talking about. Billick can have some "duh" moments in the booth. I'm guessing he had some of that on the sidelines too.

Anyway, I agree with you. It was well managed by the Pack to get a shot at the touchdown and come away with 3 and no time left.
He does generally allow himself to be corrected instead of just pretending like it never happened like Michaels would do with Madden.

True. I'll give him that. Not that I dislike Billick but there are very few TV announcers I actually like.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 01:57 PM
Q if you could hold on to a pass, you would start and make the Pro Bowl.

Brohm
12-27-2009, 01:58 PM
Finley can :D

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:00 PM
Great first down. Nice call and run by BJack.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:00 PM
nice play by jackson. now let's get a td pass to jennings

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:01 PM
Nice eyes Brandon!!! TD!!

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:01 PM
BJax :shock: :D

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:01 PM
jackson again...i'll take it

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:01 PM
BJAX another!! DAGGER!!

Bossman641
12-27-2009, 02:01 PM
Nice to see Jackson get a few TD's today

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:02 PM
The folks that were predicting a 30 point win will be enthused. Flynn needs to be in by the Fourth Quarter.

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:03 PM
hate to beat this into the ground, but does grant see that hole and score, or does he run into the pack and gain 2 per usual?

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:08 PM
Bigby x2!

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:08 PM
man, Hasselbeck is awful...Just awful..

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:08 PM
Time for Hass to start thinking about retirement, methinks.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:08 PM
Nice pick Atari. Now Packers get to saddle up the running game.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:09 PM
way to go d

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:09 PM
Time to switch over to CBS and catch the rest of that good Raven/Steeler game. We gots this one in the bag.. :D

green_bowl_packer
12-27-2009, 02:09 PM
Lets get Ahman a TD

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:10 PM
Nice pick Atari. Now Packers get to saddle up the running game.

that'll be a three and out. keep doing what we're doing.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:10 PM
Put up another score...make it 38-3...and get some of the starters out of there.

TravisWilliams23
12-27-2009, 02:12 PM
What a difference a week makes.
Gotta give Capers credit for turning last weeks debacle into
this weeks glowing effort.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:12 PM
way to put the jinx on AR mr announcer. :roll:

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:14 PM
BJax x3!!

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:14 PM
Great drive by the Packer O.

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:14 PM
What a difference a week makes.
Gotta give Capers credit for turning last weeks debacle into
this weeks glowing effort.

Keep in mind the quality of the opponent however. The Seachickens make a lot of people look good.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:15 PM
nice to get a blow-out once in a while.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:16 PM
Time for the Flynn era to begin.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:16 PM
Yeah...the Seahawks have had some success moving the football. Hass just keeps throwing picks.

Props to the defense for correcting early issues stopping the run...and taking advantage of mistakes by holding onto the INTs.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:17 PM
Time for the Flynn era to begin.

Amen...I don't want to see anymore of Rodgers.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:17 PM
Time for the Flynn era to begin.

i hope not.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:18 PM
Nice hiding B Jackson on that play, but I am not sure they fooled the DT on it!

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:20 PM
ya think who's-your-mamma is missing cincy? lol

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:22 PM
Nice stuff Raji :D

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:23 PM
mr matthews nearly

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 02:23 PM
ya think who's-your-mamma is missing cincy? lol
They may be missing HIM--they are tied with an awful Chiefs team in the 4th today.

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:24 PM
Chillar smoked em :shock:

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:24 PM
They're just teeing off now..Beautiful!

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:24 PM
haha looks like chillar forgot his celebration dance

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:25 PM
And Flynn is in.

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:26 PM
ARods qb rating today: 102.9

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:26 PM
Hope we get to see some designed pass plays for Flynn in favorable down and distances...instead of run, run, pass against a 6 man rush.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:26 PM
Tampa scores and is within 7 of N'orleans.

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 02:27 PM
Giants now down 41-9

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:27 PM
Flynn throwing! :shock:

TravisWilliams23
12-27-2009, 02:27 PM
This is the Packers Christmas present to us all.

2nd string QB gets to mop up all 4th quarter + Carolina
puts the cherry on top by knocking off the Giants.

We're in the Playoffs!!!

:lol:

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:28 PM
looks like MM's going to let Flynn run the offense instead of being a handoff machine

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:28 PM
Nice throw Flynn.

TennesseePackerBacker
12-27-2009, 02:28 PM
What a game! GO PACK GO!

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 02:28 PM
Flynns arm strength seems improved by looking at that out he threw

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:29 PM
Flynn throwing! :shock:

needs to be throwing. 3 and out running won't help anyone.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:29 PM
McCarthy is doing the right thing here...letting Flynn gain some valuable experience throwing the ball.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:30 PM
Brian Brohm 16/26 137 Yds 0 TDs 1 Int

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:30 PM
damm nice play by flynn

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:30 PM
Nice play Flynn :D

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:30 PM
Stay inbounds!

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:30 PM
Nice Flynn!

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:31 PM
WOW...great play by Flynn.

TennesseePackerBacker
12-27-2009, 02:31 PM
Damn Flynn is a gamer.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:32 PM
Clifton is out and Lang in at LT.

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 02:32 PM
This most definitely doesn't look like the rookie that played against Tampa last year.
He might not ever be a viable starter but he surely is improved.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:33 PM
Jackson had a big gain if he had stayed wide.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:33 PM
mason needs this

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:33 PM
Come on Crosby....GOOD

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:33 PM
CROSBY!

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:33 PM
got it

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:34 PM
Nailed it. Over 50 I think.

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:34 PM
Yes..Get Mase some kicks..Well, it looked shaky but went through..Good job Mase!!

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:34 PM
20 degrees...and that was good from 60.

Again...no reason to even CONSIDER dumping Crosby right now.

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:34 PM
Yes..Get Mase some kicks..Well, it looked shaky but went through..Good job Mase!!

beggars can't be choosers...this has to really bolster his shaky confidence

TennesseePackerBacker
12-27-2009, 02:36 PM
Your avatar is my favorite Leaper.

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 02:36 PM
52 yarder for Crosby--gotta love that.

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:37 PM
Yes..Get Mase some kicks..Well, it looked shaky but went through..Good job Mase!!

beggars can't be choosers...this has to really bolster his shaky confidence

No doubt about it. I didn't realize it was 52 yards either. Great kick..

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:37 PM
Yeah...I can't bring myself to get rid of it until Dallas finally does win a playoff game.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:37 PM
The Packers don't so much hit on Special Teams as they swarm. Its not as dramatic, but its working today.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:38 PM
Crosby is mashing some nice kickoffs too...a yard deep on a day like today is awesome.

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 02:39 PM
Giants fail to score on 4th and goal at the Panthers 1.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:40 PM
Giants fail

Corrected.

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 02:40 PM
Please get Woodson out of there.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:40 PM
Martin hurt. That is not going to help ST. Hope he is OK.

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:40 PM
chuck is quiet today

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:40 PM
Yeah...I can't bring myself to get rid of it until Dallas finally does win a playoff game.

let's hope that streak lasts another 20 years.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:41 PM
Please get Woodson out of there.

Defensive players can protect themselves a little better than a QB...I've got no issue with Woodson being out there.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:41 PM
Tamps ties NO on a punt return TD

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:42 PM
tampa tied with no

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 02:42 PM
Please get Woodson out of there.

Defensive players can protect themselves a little better than a QB...I've got no issue with Woodson being out there.
He has been banged up for the last couple weeks and its exactly a young football player, what purpose does it serve?

TennesseePackerBacker
12-27-2009, 02:43 PM
chuck is quiet today

When you dont hear a CB's name it's usually a good day.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:43 PM
The NFC seems wide open going into the postseason...cracks are showing in both of the high seeds. We are now in...and it is anyone's conference to win IMO.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:44 PM
bradsack!

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:44 PM
Phew no roughing

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:45 PM
chuck is quiet today

When you dont hear a CB's name it's usually a good day.

i wanted him to solidify his DPOY with an explosive play today...oh well

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:45 PM
Tampa Bay ties the game..Wow..Maybe the NFC is more wide open than we thought??

TennesseePackerBacker
12-27-2009, 02:47 PM
chuck is quiet today

When you dont hear a CB's name it's usually a good day.

i wanted him to solidify his DPOY with an explosive play today...oh well

Patience...He'll see a good deal of Linehart(sp?) next week

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:48 PM
Flynn's arm strength does seem improved...but some of that might just be experience. He seems to know what he wants to do with the ball...he's more decisive.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:49 PM
Good PI call. Odd, it seems like a well officiated game when the Packers don't have 12 penalties. :D

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:49 PM
C'mon Flynn...get your first NFL passing TD.

Brohm
12-27-2009, 02:50 PM
Think Green was a little excited to get in the endzone :P :D

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:50 PM
Or Ahman...that's nice too.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 02:51 PM
nice to see a green td. very happy for him.

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 02:52 PM
Giants fail

Corrected.

Noted. :lol: :lol:

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:55 PM
was tony romo holding for the saints?

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 02:55 PM
I'm not liking having to play the Cardinals in the playoffs though...I don't think we match up well with them.

red
12-27-2009, 02:55 PM
what a great day, everything seems to be going our way

even jarret bush managed to not make a joke out of himself today. and maybe crosby has now shaken the mental cramps he was having

of, and we're in the playoffs. not something i expected 8 weeks ago

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:55 PM
Hawk should have driven hard to the outside and forced the receiver inside to keep the clock running.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 02:56 PM
Giants lose, it official. 41-9

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 02:57 PM
TB has taken the Saints into overtime

imscott72
12-27-2009, 02:57 PM
I'm not liking having to play the Cardinals in the playoffs though...I don't think we match up well with them.

I don't think we match up well with any pass heavy team. Lack of pass rush, combined with a subpar secondary spells trouble against teams like Minny, NO, and Zona. Look what Pitt did to us last week..

packer4life
12-27-2009, 02:58 PM
I'm not liking having to play the Cardinals in the playoffs though...I don't think we match up well with them.

I don't think we match up well with any pass heavy team. Lack of pass rush, combined with a subpar secondary spells trouble against teams like Minny, NO, and Zona. Look what Pitt did to us last week..

lack of pass rush? i wouldn't go that far

red
12-27-2009, 02:59 PM
is there any chance we can have a home playoff game? or do the wildcard teams automatically have to travel to a division winner, even if we have a better record?

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:00 PM
I think our pass rush is fine...but our secondary has holes.

ARI scares me...because they have loads of highly talented WRs and a monster OL.

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 03:00 PM
Huh--still throwing up 38 points with 4 minutes to go.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:01 PM
is there any chance we can have a home playoff game? or do the wildcard teams automatically have to travel to a division winner, even if we have a better record?

Wildcards always are on the road.

Only chance we could have at a home game in NFCC game...against the #6 seed (if we remain the #5 seed).

pbmax
12-27-2009, 03:01 PM
Horrible punt.

imscott72
12-27-2009, 03:01 PM
I'm not liking having to play the Cardinals in the playoffs though...I don't think we match up well with them.

I don't think we match up well with any pass heavy team. Lack of pass rush, combined with a subpar secondary spells trouble against teams like Minny, NO, and Zona. Look what Pitt did to us last week..

lack of pass rush? i wouldn't go that far

You can't count today's game. Seattle isn't a good measuring stick at all. Against great teams the pass rush hasn't been there.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:01 PM
Huh--still throwing up 38 points with 4 minutes to go.

Gotta give Flynn reps. THis is the NFL...I have no issue with a team putting up 100 points if they want to.

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 03:01 PM
is there any chance we can have a home playoff game? or do the wildcard teams automatically have to travel to a division winner, even if we have a better record?
Yes, division winners get seeds 1-4 and WCs get 5 and 6 even if the WC team has a better record. Only chance for a playoff game this year at Lambeau is getting the 5 seed and playing the 6 seed in the NFC title game.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:03 PM
Against great teams the pass rush hasn't been there.

They got pressure against both Dallas and Pittsburgh.

I think we also would do better against the VIkings now...our front seven has reached more of a comfort zone in the 4-3, which wasn't as true in the first half of the season.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 03:03 PM
I think our pass rush is fine...but our secondary has holes.

ARI scares me...because they have loads of highly talented WRs and a monster OL.
No, this D lacks conventional pass rushers. When a team is in throw only mode and the Packers are dropping seven or eight, their pass rush suffers. If Capers can blitz, then it works better.

Bossman641
12-27-2009, 03:03 PM
Against great teams the pass rush hasn't been there.

They got pressure against both Dallas and Pittsburgh.

I think we also would do better against the VIkings now...our front seven has reached more of a comfort zone in the 4-3, which wasn't as true in the first half of the season.

Let's hope they haven't reached a comfort level in the 4-3 :D

red
12-27-2009, 03:03 PM
is there any chance we can have a home playoff game? or do the wildcard teams automatically have to travel to a division winner, even if we have a better record?

Wildcards always are on the road.

Only chance we could have at a home game in NFCC game...against the #6 seed (if we remain the #5 seed).

thats crap, you're rewarding a team for being the best in a horrible division

it should all be based on record

if a team has the 3rd or 4th best record in their conference, they should host a first round game, even if they are a wildcard

Badgerinmaine
12-27-2009, 03:04 PM
is there any chance we can have a home playoff game? or do the wildcard teams automatically have to travel to a division winner, even if we have a better record?

Wildcards always are on the road.

Only chance we could have at a home game in NFCC game...against the #6 seed (if we remain the #5 seed).

thats crap, you're rewarding a team for being the best in a horrible division

it should all be based on record

if a team has the 3rd or 4th best record in their conference, they should host a first round game, even if they are a wildcard
I don't agree--then it would be like the NBA where divisions don't mean anything.

imscott72
12-27-2009, 03:05 PM
Against great teams the pass rush hasn't been there.

They got pressure against both Dallas and Pittsburgh.

I think we also would do better against the VIkings now...our front seven has reached more of a comfort zone in the 4-3, which wasn't as true in the first half of the season.

Dallas sucks, and when we needed the pass rush most against the Steelers it wasn't there. I'd love to be wrong, I just think with dangerous pass heavy teams we're in trouble..

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:06 PM
No, this D lacks conventional pass rushers. When a team is in throw only mode and the Packers are dropping seven or eight, their pass rush suffers. If Capers can blitz, then it works better.

What teams get great pass rush with a 3 man rush? If you are dropping 8, you aren't likely to get a pass rush...no matter if your OL has both Reggie White and Deacon Jones.

Brohm
12-27-2009, 03:06 PM
There has been talk over the past few years about making adjustments to avoid the throw away games at the end of the year (teams resting starters etc because it's wrapped up) and making overall record matter more.

gbgary
12-27-2009, 03:07 PM
tampa won

imscott72
12-27-2009, 03:07 PM
Down go the Saints..Wow..

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:08 PM
Dallas sucks, and when we needed the pass rush most against the Steelers it wasn't there.

Really? It was there on the second to last play...Jenkins should have ended it but couldn't get Ben on the ground.

Our pass rush is fine...it isn't elite, but they get to the QB enough to force turnovers.

denverYooper
12-27-2009, 03:11 PM
Against great teams the pass rush hasn't been there.

They got pressure against both Dallas and Pittsburgh.

I think we also would do better against the VIkings now...our front seven has reached more of a comfort zone in the 4-3, which wasn't as true in the first half of the season.

Dallas sucks, and when we needed the pass rush most against the Steelers it wasn't there. I'd love to be wrong, I just think with dangerous pass heavy teams we're in trouble..

If against any other QB than Roethlisburger, Cullen gets the 6th sack to end the game.

pbmax
12-27-2009, 03:12 PM
No, this D lacks conventional pass rushers. When a team is in throw only mode and the Packers are dropping seven or eight, their pass rush suffers. If Capers can blitz, then it works better.

What teams get great pass rush with a 3 man rush? If you are dropping 8, you aren't likely to get a pass rush...no matter if your OL has both Reggie White and Deacon Jones.
3 man lines, just like 4 man lines can get a rush, but the rate of success is lower for the 3 man and it takes longer. And that is fine as you don't even need the sack, you need to force the throw to come out. The Packers too often were doing neither.

red
12-27-2009, 03:12 PM
is there any chance we can have a home playoff game? or do the wildcard teams automatically have to travel to a division winner, even if we have a better record?

Wildcards always are on the road.

Only chance we could have at a home game in NFCC game...against the #6 seed (if we remain the #5 seed).

thats crap, you're rewarding a team for being the best in a horrible division

it should all be based on record

if a team has the 3rd or 4th best record in their conference, they should host a first round game, even if they are a wildcard
I don't agree--then it would be like the NBA where divisions don't mean anything.

they still matter, you still get into the playoffs when you win a division. and that should be good enough

a team that goes 6-10 in a horrible division and wins the division is already getting a gift by being in the playoffs without being one of the 6 best teams

why reward them further by giving them a home game?

denverYooper
12-27-2009, 03:13 PM
Playoffs.

Looks like numb needs to fix his sig.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:14 PM
There has been talk over the past few years about making adjustments to avoid the throw away games at the end of the year (teams resting starters etc because it's wrapped up) and making overall record matter more.

There will always be throw away games...impossible to eliminate them. But I do like the idea of eliminating the automatic home field for the division winners. Give division winners an automatic playoff berth...but seed everyone according to overall record.

ICU81MI
12-27-2009, 03:15 PM
Packers, Philly and Minne look like the teams to beat in the NFC. Philly looks to be the best team.

BallHawk
12-27-2009, 03:16 PM
a team that goes 6-10 in a horrible division and wins the division is already getting a gift by being in the playoffs without being one of the 6 best teams

But that's never happened before and likely will never happen. The worst record a division winner has ever had was 8-8 (1985 Browns). I see no problem with divisions.

The Leaper
12-27-2009, 03:19 PM
But that's never happened before and likely will never happen. The worst record a division winner has ever had was 8-8 (1985 Browns). I see no problem with divisions.

I don't think anyone is arguing that division winners shouldn't make the playoffs...just that they shouldn't host playoff games against teams with better records.

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 03:23 PM
a team that goes 6-10 in a horrible division and wins the division is already getting a gift by being in the playoffs without being one of the 6 best teams

But that's never happened before and likely will never happen. The worst record a division winner has ever had was 8-8 (1985 Browns). I see no problem with divisions.
Do you think that people are arguing to remove divisions? Thats not the case. They are simply saying that the seeds in the playoffs should be entirely based on overall record.
I find it hard to believe that you don't see anything wrong if an 11-5 wildcard team having to go play on the road in the playoffs against an 8-8 division winner.

MJZiggy
12-27-2009, 03:24 PM
I'm not liking having to play the Cardinals in the playoffs though...I don't think we match up well with them.

I don't care if we play Jesus and the Angels in the playoffs, we made it in...

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 03:27 PM
I will take this playoff argument one further and say that first round byes should also be based on overall record. Lets say the Packers and the Vikings have the same record at 13-3 but the Vikings beat the Packers twice. Under the current system even if the Packers had the second best record int he conference, they would have to play a road game in the first round of the playoffs. I would think that they should get a first round bye over an 11-5 division winner.

BallHawk
12-27-2009, 03:31 PM
a team that goes 6-10 in a horrible division and wins the division is already getting a gift by being in the playoffs without being one of the 6 best teams

But that's never happened before and likely will never happen. The worst record a division winner has ever had was 8-8 (1985 Browns). I see no problem with divisions.
Do you think that people are arguing to remove divisions? Thats not the case. They are simply saying that the seeds in the playoffs should be entirely based on overall record.
I find it hard to believe that you don't see anything wrong if an 11-5 wildcard team having to go play on the road in the playoffs against an 8-8 division winner.

I know that's what people mean, I worded that last part badly.

To answer your question, I think if a team beats out 3 other teams vying for the same title (division champ) they are entitled to host a playoff game. If the wild card teams are so supposedly superior to these division teams, it shouldn't matter that the wild card team has to go on the road, right?

pbmax
12-27-2009, 03:44 PM
Division games are largely the rivalry games. There is no reason to reduce their importance to the two cities alone. If you can't win the division, then you don't get the perks. Wild Cards have been doing just fine in the new format. In fact, they have been more successful under the new format than ever before and do not need additional help.

red
12-27-2009, 03:44 PM
a team that goes 6-10 in a horrible division and wins the division is already getting a gift by being in the playoffs without being one of the 6 best teams

But that's never happened before and likely will never happen. The worst record a division winner has ever had was 8-8 (1985 Browns). I see no problem with divisions.
Do you think that people are arguing to remove divisions? Thats not the case. They are simply saying that the seeds in the playoffs should be entirely based on overall record.
I find it hard to believe that you don't see anything wrong if an 11-5 wildcard team having to go play on the road in the playoffs against an 8-8 division winner.

I know that's what people mean, I worded that last part badly.

To answer your question, I think if a team beats out 3 other teams vying for the same title (division champ) they are entitled to host a playoff game. If the wild card teams are so supposedly superior to these division teams, it shouldn't matter that the wild card team has to go on the road, right?

bullshit

its a big advantage playing at home, not to mention the millions of dollars of revenue a home game brings in

there's a chance that we will play the cardinals in the playoffs, there's also a chance we'll have the better record when that happens

but we would have to play in arizona all because they were the best out of the worst division in the nfl.

that just doesn't seem right to me

and a game in arizona vs a game in green bay in january, there's a giant difference there

Sparkey
12-27-2009, 04:50 PM
If the Packers were the beneficiary of the current playoff setup, how many people would be wanting it changed ? :wink:

Packman_26
12-27-2009, 06:14 PM
If the Packers were the beneficiary of the current playoff setup, how many people would be wanting it changed ? :wink:
I have thought this about the playoff system for years, it just so happens that the Packers could be on the short end this year.

Guiness
12-27-2009, 07:40 PM
Missed the game today....

Love the boxscore though, looks like a solid win. I especially like the INT numbers, shows the secondary showed up pissed off after having that loss last week hung on them.

Going to watch the recorded game and read everyone's commentary now. It tends to be much more insightful than anything the announcers have to say. Primarily because the announcers never say "what the fuck was he thinking there???"

mmmdk
12-27-2009, 08:44 PM
Missed the game today....

Love the boxscore though, looks like a solid win. I especially like the INT numbers, shows the secondary showed up pissed off after having that loss last week hung on them.

Going to watch the recorded game and read everyone's commentary now. It tends to be much more insightful than anything the announcers have to say. Primarily because the announcers never say "what the fuck was he thinking there???"

Seattle was horrible to watch; Packers were in a different league all together and that says a lot 'cos Packers didn't even go full throttle (not needed).

HarveyWallbangers
12-27-2009, 10:50 PM
I like the current playoff format, and I hope it stays this way for a long time.

MJZiggy
12-27-2009, 11:03 PM
We need the practice with our calculus skills...

channtheman
12-28-2009, 12:10 AM
If the Packers do not win by 30 it will be a disappointment.

Prepare to be disappointed.

Or not. :oops: :lol:

ICU81MI
12-28-2009, 01:07 AM
6 TDs from RBs today.

Iron Mike
12-28-2009, 06:59 AM
Missed the game today....


Not me......I was there. :wink: