Chillar done

[SavedByGrace]

http://www.jsonline.com/newswatch/126394378.html

[Zool]

I know I'm mostly alone in this, but thank you Ted. We need LB's not big safety's.

[SkinBasket]

I know I'm mostly alone in this, but thank you Ted. We need LB's not big safety's.

With fabulous hair.

[hoosier]

I thought that in a normal year you can't cut someone who is injured. Does that only apply if they got hurt on the job, so to speak, in a game or in TC? If there hadn't been a lockout and Chillar hurt his hammy in the offseason, would they have any obligation to him?

[Smidgeon]

I know I'm mostly alone in this, but thank you Ted. We need LB's not big safety's.

And yet I was still impressed for that game where he did play safety...

[Fritz]

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTF8OlTShKPJHk6g5jUN_GqceUB1kp_B MyagLyWX5Hn5syyzF-Y

[pbmax]

That is one think ILB corp right now. Chillar and Barnett are better than thin air. And its not much in coverage and TEs were the only pass option that killed the Packers last year.