Bishop: Probowl?

[RashanGary]

2nd in the NFL in tackles
1st in the NFL for ILB sacks

He's playing lights out.

[Joemailman]

He's playing great, but it can be tough for an ILB in a 3-4 to make it. Gotta figure Urlacher and Willis are going to make it. How many get voted in?

[rbaloha1]

Yes.

[mission]

Besides being horrible in coverage.

[rbaloha1]

Besides being horrible in coverage.

Hugely improved. Won some battles with Gates and lost some. The last one appeared Bishop was expecting help. Solid performance.

[Upnorth]

I will slight no LB for preforming as well against Gates as Bishop did. Not great, but this is Gates we are talking about. I doubt Bishop makes the probowl, and I also doubt he is worthy of it, and I am a homer.

[Bretsky]

When I think of a Pro Bowl LB Bishop doesn't enter my head
Clay Matthews does

IMO they are at different levels

[mraynrand]

Gates would love to see Bishop in the Probowl. Don't the winners get a bigger check?

[Brandon494]

If Hawk can make it...

[mmmdk]

Clay's hammy should go to the Pro Bowl (easy on those roids, kid). Bishop is playing well yet Clay is better - even with a hammy. The Packers DL is either declining or overrated - even sans Jenkins and Neal. Our secondary has gone 'Las Vegas' 'cos they know they can't cover for ages. That's our defense!

With that said, I think our linebackers have been the most solid defensive group. They work hard every play. Our secondary is schizo and our DL are like packages being moved backwards by the O-lines of the NFL.

[Bub]

I have a hard time believing anyone should make it on the D. I'd like to think we're playing overly vanilla D so we have something new to throw at other teams come playoff time (when it counts)....but that may be the kool-aid talking.

[Upnorth]

Clay's hammy should go to the Pro Bowl (easy on those roids, kid). Bishop is playing well yet Clay is better - even with a hammy. The Packers DL is either declining or overrated - even sans Jenkins and Neal. Our secondary has gone 'Las Vegas' 'cos they know they can't cover for ages. That's our defense!

With that said, I think our linebackers have been the most solid defensive group. They work hard every play. Our secondary is schizo and our DL are like packages being moved backwards by the O-lines of the NFL.

So I agree with most of this but don't undertsand the las vegas comment. What does that mean?

[Zool]

Besides being horrible in coverage.

No shit. How many times is he going to turn his back to his guy to look at the QB?

[Brandon494]

^ not like he was covering the best TE in the league or anything .

[pbmax]

No shit. How many times is he going to turn his back to his guy to look at the QB?

Worked the first time.