View Full Version : Bishop: Probowl?
RashanGary
11-06-2011, 09:21 PM
2nd in the NFL in tackles
1st in the NFL for ILB sacks
He's playing lights out.
Joemailman
11-06-2011, 09:24 PM
He's playing great, but it can be tough for an ILB in a 3-4 to make it. Gotta figure Urlacher and Willis are going to make it. How many get voted in?
rbaloha1
11-06-2011, 09:40 PM
Yes.
mission
11-06-2011, 09:50 PM
Besides being horrible in coverage.
rbaloha1
11-06-2011, 09:55 PM
Besides being horrible in coverage.
Hugely improved. Won some battles with Gates and lost some. The last one appeared Bishop was expecting help. Solid performance.
Upnorth
11-06-2011, 10:17 PM
I will slight no LB for preforming as well against Gates as Bishop did. Not great, but this is Gates we are talking about. I doubt Bishop makes the probowl, and I also doubt he is worthy of it, and I am a homer.
Bretsky
11-06-2011, 10:19 PM
When I think of a Pro Bowl LB Bishop doesn't enter my head
Clay Matthews does
IMO they are at different levels
mraynrand
11-07-2011, 12:35 AM
Gates would love to see Bishop in the Probowl. Don't the winners get a bigger check?
Brandon494
11-07-2011, 06:21 AM
If Hawk can make it...
mmmdk
11-07-2011, 06:56 AM
Clay's hammy should go to the Pro Bowl (easy on those roids, kid). Bishop is playing well yet Clay is better - even with a hammy. The Packers DL is either declining or overrated - even sans Jenkins and Neal. Our secondary has gone 'Las Vegas' 'cos they know they can't cover for ages. That's our defense!
With that said, I think our linebackers have been the most solid defensive group. They work hard every play. Our secondary is schizo and our DL are like packages being moved backwards by the O-lines of the NFL.
I have a hard time believing anyone should make it on the D. I'd like to think we're playing overly vanilla D so we have something new to throw at other teams come playoff time (when it counts)....but that may be the kool-aid talking.
Upnorth
11-07-2011, 07:55 AM
Clay's hammy should go to the Pro Bowl (easy on those roids, kid). Bishop is playing well yet Clay is better - even with a hammy. The Packers DL is either declining or overrated - even sans Jenkins and Neal. Our secondary has gone 'Las Vegas' 'cos they know they can't cover for ages. That's our defense!
With that said, I think our linebackers have been the most solid defensive group. They work hard every play. Our secondary is schizo and our DL are like packages being moved backwards by the O-lines of the NFL.
So I agree with most of this but don't undertsand the las vegas comment. What does that mean?
Besides being horrible in coverage.
No shit. How many times is he going to turn his back to his guy to look at the QB?
Brandon494
11-07-2011, 10:14 AM
^ not like he was covering the best TE in the league or anything .
pbmax
11-07-2011, 10:52 AM
No shit. How many times is he going to turn his back to his guy to look at the QB?
Worked the first time.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.