PDA

View Full Version : Bishop: Probowl?



RashanGary
11-06-2011, 09:21 PM
2nd in the NFL in tackles
1st in the NFL for ILB sacks

He's playing lights out.

Joemailman
11-06-2011, 09:24 PM
He's playing great, but it can be tough for an ILB in a 3-4 to make it. Gotta figure Urlacher and Willis are going to make it. How many get voted in?

rbaloha1
11-06-2011, 09:40 PM
Yes.

mission
11-06-2011, 09:50 PM
Besides being horrible in coverage.

rbaloha1
11-06-2011, 09:55 PM
Besides being horrible in coverage.

Hugely improved. Won some battles with Gates and lost some. The last one appeared Bishop was expecting help. Solid performance.

Upnorth
11-06-2011, 10:17 PM
I will slight no LB for preforming as well against Gates as Bishop did. Not great, but this is Gates we are talking about. I doubt Bishop makes the probowl, and I also doubt he is worthy of it, and I am a homer.

Bretsky
11-06-2011, 10:19 PM
When I think of a Pro Bowl LB Bishop doesn't enter my head
Clay Matthews does

IMO they are at different levels

mraynrand
11-07-2011, 12:35 AM
Gates would love to see Bishop in the Probowl. Don't the winners get a bigger check?

Brandon494
11-07-2011, 06:21 AM
If Hawk can make it...

mmmdk
11-07-2011, 06:56 AM
Clay's hammy should go to the Pro Bowl (easy on those roids, kid). Bishop is playing well yet Clay is better - even with a hammy. The Packers DL is either declining or overrated - even sans Jenkins and Neal. Our secondary has gone 'Las Vegas' 'cos they know they can't cover for ages. That's our defense!

With that said, I think our linebackers have been the most solid defensive group. They work hard every play. Our secondary is schizo and our DL are like packages being moved backwards by the O-lines of the NFL.

Bub
11-07-2011, 07:17 AM
I have a hard time believing anyone should make it on the D. I'd like to think we're playing overly vanilla D so we have something new to throw at other teams come playoff time (when it counts)....but that may be the kool-aid talking.

Upnorth
11-07-2011, 07:55 AM
Clay's hammy should go to the Pro Bowl (easy on those roids, kid). Bishop is playing well yet Clay is better - even with a hammy. The Packers DL is either declining or overrated - even sans Jenkins and Neal. Our secondary has gone 'Las Vegas' 'cos they know they can't cover for ages. That's our defense!

With that said, I think our linebackers have been the most solid defensive group. They work hard every play. Our secondary is schizo and our DL are like packages being moved backwards by the O-lines of the NFL.

So I agree with most of this but don't undertsand the las vegas comment. What does that mean?

Zool
11-07-2011, 10:02 AM
Besides being horrible in coverage.

No shit. How many times is he going to turn his back to his guy to look at the QB?

Brandon494
11-07-2011, 10:14 AM
^ not like he was covering the best TE in the league or anything .

pbmax
11-07-2011, 10:52 AM
No shit. How many times is he going to turn his back to his guy to look at the QB?

Worked the first time.