WTF?!?

[Mazzin]

Where is that crazy bastard tank at?

Haven't seen him around, and haven't heard him say goodbye, is he around?

[Bretsky]

Haven't seen him in a while; my guess is he's girl whipped with the chick at work.

[retailguy]

Haven't seen him in a while; my guess is he's girl whipped with the chick at work.

either that, or we all finally pissed him off... Maybe his dad cut him off and he had to decide between internet access or pot?

[retailguy]

Mazzin - What's a "crunk"?

[Mazzin]

Crunk would be just "live, energetic, loud, having fun, like instead of acting crazy, it would be GETTING CRUNK!!!!!!!!! you know.

Tank messaged me on AIM....but i wasn't at my computer to understand or get what happened, he just swaid hey, do you still post at packerrats...and thats it, i think something fishy is up...next i wont be able to post here either, so if i dissappear raise hell everyone haha, its like this is the secret govt' of pr. :lol:

[Bretsky]

Hey Mazzin,

You're a hottie; I don't think Tank was forced out of the ship here. No clue why he's not posting. I know he tried posting some junk in the Packer forum that should have been in the OT Romper Room and was upset because people were making him follow the rules, but hey, Tank's always had rough skin so I'd be surprised if that bothers him in the end.

Cheers,
B

[Mazzin]

Thanks bretsky, Ill talk to him the next time he gets on AIM, and ill get the low down! Thanks bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SEE THAT SHIT RIGHT THERE IS CRUNK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[BallHawk]

He's handcuffed to the bed at a Super 8 Motel somewhere in Maryland. His wallet is missing and so is his car. Turned out the girl wasn't worth spending 1,000+ dollars on, in the end. And the worst part is that he can't find the remote and the TV is stuck to Fox News. :shock:

[Doe]

Haven't seen him in a while; my guess is he's girl whipped with the chick at work.

either that, or we all finally pissed him off... Maybe his dad cut him off and he had to decide between internet access or pot?

I'm glad he made the right choice.

[Scott Campbell]

And the worst part is that he can't find the remote and the TV is stuck to Fox News. :shock:

Hilarious! I've never seen a 13 year old who is so damned funny.

[Partial]

the definition of crunk is widely debated between getting high and drunk at the sametime

&

getting drunk and crazy and combining the words.


Either way, it seems stupid to me.

[Mazzin]

Yes I am indeed stupid, but its a word people my age use alot in a joking manner. So say what you will, I'm just crunk like a motherfucking riot!


And if I offended you by saying BITCHES! it was like a friend thing like you know how you call you friends bitches to their face joking aournd, thats how it is, you dont have to be my bitches but you guys are THE bitches!

Or you guys could possibly be the "shit" (its a good thing :wink:

[Bretsky]

I wanna be thought of as "The Shit"

[K-town]

I wanna be thought of as "The Shit"

I've often been called "a shit." Is that the same thing?

[MJZiggy]

Yes, dear. :wink:

[Deputy Nutz]

"Man that was dope, you get your bitch on, You're one bad ass bear shit homey!"

[retailguy]

"Man that was dope, you get your bitch on, You're one bad ass bear shit homey!"


Sigh.... I'm old. Guess that makes me "old shit"....

[jack's smirking revenge]

I wanna be thought of as "The Shit"

I've often been called "a shit." Is that the same thing?

"A" is an indefinite article, meaning that you are part of the big, massive shitpile known as the human race. "The" is a definite article, meaning you are the "king shit" or "big shit" or "top shit" or "most important shit". Sadly, they are not the same thing.

But, on a positive note, at least you are made of the same composte as the rest of us...

tyler

[K-town]

I wanna be thought of as "The Shit"

I've often been called "a shit." Is that the same thing?

"A" is an indefinite article, meaning that you are part of the big, massive shitpile known as the human race. "The" is a definite article, meaning you are the "king shit" or "big shit" or "top shit" or "most important shit". Sadly, they are not the same thing.

But, on a positive note, at least you are made of the same composte as the rest of us...

tyler

Thanks, JSR. I feel better now, all warm and fuzzy. Or, warm and smelly.
You know what I mean.

[Zool]

Peanutty?

[GBRulz]

Many people are at a loss for a response when someone says, "You don't know Jack Schitt" Now you can handle the situation.

Jack was the only son of Awe Schitt and Owe Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertiliser magnate, married Owe Schitt, the proprietor of Kneedeep N. Schitt Inc.

In turn Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt, and the deeply religious couple had six children: Holie Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Giva Schitt, Bull Schitt and the twins Deap Schitt and Dip Schitt.

Against her parents will, Deap Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school drop-out. After being married for 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced. Noe Schitt later married Mr. Sherlock and, because her children were still living with them she kept her previous name. She was then known as NoeSchitt-Sherlock.

Dip Schitt married Loada Schitt and they produced a nervous son, Chicken Schitt.

Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt were inseparable throughout their childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. The local newspapers duly announced the Schitt-Happens weddings. The Schitt-Happens children were named Dawg, Byrd and Hoarse.

Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently returned from Italy with his new wife, Pisa Schitt.

So now when someone says,"You don't know Jack Schitt", you can correct them because you know his whole family and life story!

[MJZiggy]

Very nice, very nice.

[BallHawk]

And the worst part is that he can't find the remote and the TV is stuck to Fox News. :shock:

Hilarious! I've never seen a 13 year old who is so damned funny.

Thanks, Scott. I have to say I watch mainly CNN and MSNBC, but I pop in to fox occasionaly. Gotta see what loofah boy and Cuu-Koo Coulter are up to.

[woodbuck27]

Where is that crazy bastard tank at?

Haven't seen him around, and haven't heard him say goodbye, is he around?

Yea!! where is Tank and also - where is Harlan?

It's been awhile since I've seen Harlan post. Longer . . for Tank.

????????

[Partial]

Where is that crazy bastard tank at?

Haven't seen him around, and haven't heard him say goodbye, is he around?

Yea!! where is Tank and also - where is Harlan?

It's been awhile since I've seen Harlan post. Longer . . for Tank.

????????

HH decided he didn't want to post here anymore. I don't know why and miss his sly humor and ability to stir the pot in a good debate.

[MJZiggy]

Harlan loves us too much.

[woodbuck27]

GBRulz:

I have a female friend that I'll send that to, back in " the Maritimes" and she'll dig that schitt alot.

She'll read that over a few times, and honest to Betsy - memorize it .

For years to come, party goers (with Nancy) will hear that schtick.

NO SCHITT !! :mrgreen:

[woodbuck27]

Where is that crazy bastard tank at?

Haven't seen him around, and haven't heard him say goodbye, is he around?

Yea!! where is Tank and also - where is Harlan?

It's been awhile since I've seen Harlan post. Longer . . for Tank.

????????

HH decided he didn't want to post here anymore. I don't know why and miss his sly humor and ability to stir the pot in a good debate.

No way!!???

I thought he was just "hanging the schitt" Partial.

That's . . . NOT RIGHT. :sad: X 10

[hurleyfan]

Where is that crazy bastard tank at?

Haven't seen him around, and haven't heard him say goodbye, is he around?

Has the mystery about this "girl" ever been solved? No one in their right mind would ever post their own pic, would they? :?: :?:

[Partial]

Where is that crazy bastard tank at?

Haven't seen him around, and haven't heard him say goodbye, is he around?

Yea!! where is Tank and also - where is Harlan?

It's been awhile since I've seen Harlan post. Longer . . for Tank.

????????

HH decided he didn't want to post here anymore. I don't know why and miss his sly humor and ability to stir the pot in a good debate.

No way!!???

I thought he was just "hanging the schitt" Partial.

That's . . . NOT RIGHT. :sad: X 10

yeah its sad. I guess that means no huck and buck commedy hour after all

[woodbuck27]

Where is that crazy bastard tank at?

Haven't seen him around, and haven't heard him say goodbye, is he around?

Yea!! where is Tank and also - where is Harlan?

It's been awhile since I've seen Harlan post. Longer . . for Tank.

????????

HH decided he didn't want to post here anymore. I don't know why and miss his sly humor and ability to stir the pot in a good debate.

No way!!???

I thought he was just "hanging the schitt" Partial.

That's . . . NOT RIGHT. :sad: X 10

yeah its sad. I guess that means no huck and buck commedy hour after all

I can't believe that Harlan would give up nor Tank.

They are taking a break.

[BallHawk]

I think Harlan left because he felt everything was too censored. i.e. Jock sniffer. He did go a little over the top from time to time, but I found him the funniest guy on the forum.

[MJZiggy]

I think Harlan left because he felt everything was too censored. i.e. Jock sniffer. He did go a little over the top from time to time, but I found him the funniest guy on the forum.

I don't think that was it. HH has a much thicker skin than that. I think he left for the exact reason he said he was leaving. He also said on his way out the door that he had no bad feelings. If you want to know for sure, you can ask him as he posted his own name and e-mail in that message as well. Come to think of it...

[GBRulz]

ok, I've obviously missed something here..... what did HH say about leaving? I love blue dog....hope he comes back.

besides, he'll be lonely and need someone's leg after a while

[Joemailman]

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:32 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nutz, I am not taking a break, I am going to not post here anymore. And the real reason is I am changing priorities in my life. This forum is too addictive for me to dabble in.

I am not mad at Madtown or anybody else. Mad treated me crappy because he is kind of an idiot. So what. We'll be friends again and chat occasionally in IM, despite his macho statements to contrary now.

I am lurking in here because I don't want to leave with bad feelings, so many great memories of characters here. Your statement about me wanting to sour the forum, uhh, sorry you have this impression. I am rebellious, and speak-up to authority. And there's the pitch black sense of humor.

Anyway, anybody can email me at RBurger@SequelSolutions.biz, my name is Dick Burger, "Harlan Huckleby" is now retired. I am staying away from the forum because it is best for me to go cold turkey, not because the forum isn't a blast.



This post was by Harlan in the thread titled Psychology 101 Questions. I had been unaware of this until just now also.

[Mazzin]

YEa i would post pics of myself, people do it on MYSPACE all the time, adn tell their city and everything.

[MadtownPacker]

despite his macho statements to contrary now.
Despite his feminine statements, he was logged on a few days ago! Hahaha!

[BananaMan]

I miss Mr. Burger.

This reminds me about the time on JSO that I locked myself out of my account. I was trying to put javascript in my sig, and it ended up not allowing anyone using IE to see the rest of the thread after I posted. And it messed up the account options page too, so I couldn't change it.

Me and him exchanged a few emails, and I know he got a laugh out of my stupidity.

Then Michele said that it was fine using Firefox. So I switched to Firefox, corrected the problem, and I've loved Firefox ever since.

And damn, I need to start spamming or something so I can get more posts and then get into the damn Garbage Can. Is the AP thread going in there?

[MJZiggy]

AP is in here. It's just a little buried is all.

[justanotherpackfan]

Hey Mazzin,

You're a hottie
I agree. :wink:

[justanotherpackfan]

And the worst part is that he can't find the remote and the TV is stuck to Fox News. :shock:

Hilarious! I've never seen a 13 year old who is so damned funny.
I agree.

[GBRulz]

Don't fret about the garbage can, nana.... I think it's going to take a while for it to get going...not much going on in there at all right now.

[Scott Campbell]

despite his macho statements to contrary now.
Despite his feminine statements, he was logged on a few days ago! Hahaha!


Cold turkey my ass.

LOL

[the_idle_threat]

If you want to know for sure, you can ask him as he posted his own name and e-mail in that message as well.

I think it was a fake name and address. I've spammed a ton of gay and goat porn to that address and so far ... no response.

Seriously, I think Tank and to a greater degree Harlan added to this forum in ways that are missed. I hope we haven't seen the last of either.

[mraynrand]

These two threads are pretty funny. I always thought Mazzin was tank - she just liked the guy way too much. Too bad about Harlan, but I know where he's coming from - I waste way too much time checking into this forum.


I think I was one of the few people who didn't think there was anything wrong with multiple accounts. The whole thing is for fun, right? Just so long as each account behaves itself, what's the harm?

I thought the reason for this forum was justified - the JSO didn't give a flying #uck about their forum - wouldn't police it, and there were some nasty people (just one - LJ?) who deliberately disrupted the forum. Still, given all that, what's wrong with more accounts? Oh, and BTW, I guess my Tankdar must be faulty as I never figured out Tank's alter egos on this forum - other than Mazzin (LOL).

[GBRulz]

I'm curious as to why someone would want multiple accounts? Other than to hide behind something.

I totally agree with the ban on multiple accounts rule that is set up here.

besides, who wants to remember another damn password to log in? :wink:

[Scott Campbell]

I think I was one of the few people who didn't think there was anything wrong with multiple accounts.

Of course you didn't Mr. President.

How you liken them Cowboys now Dubya?

[mraynrand]

I think I was one of the few people who didn't think there was anything wrong with multiple accounts.

Of course you didn't Mr. President.

How you liken them Cowboys now Dubya?

???

[mraynrand]

I'm curious as to why someone would want multiple accounts? Other than to hide behind something.

I totally agree with the ban on multiple accounts rule that is set up here.

besides, who wants to remember another damn password to log in? :wink:

1.) APB/Tank did that John Holmes, MD PhD on the JSO and it was very funny. I think the idea there was not to hide, but to be funny. In that instance, it worked.

2.) If you didn't want multiple accounts with multiple passwords, you don't have to choose that route.

I think I asked this on the thread where the multiple accounts poll was taken, but I'll posit it here: What possible harm is there in multiple accounts, so long as each "account" behaves itself? Can anyone answer this question? I have yet to see any answer that is even remotely convincing.

[HarveyWallbangers]

The bits weren't that funny. Actually, I thought all of the alter egos were pretty lame. I'd rather have one account. Then we "know" who people are. Plus, it's less maintenance for the admins.

[mraynrand]

The bits weren't that funny. Actually, I thought all of the alter egos were pretty lame. I'd rather have one account. Then we "know" who people are. Plus, it's less maintenance for the admins.

I agree that a lot of the bits weren't that funny. I don't know how you 'know' who people are just from a screen name. Harvey, you could be two or more different guys all logging in from the same computer in a house, at work, or in a dorm for all anyone knows here. And can you explain how it's more work for the administrator if the only criteria is good behaviour, and the poster behaves him/herself? If a poster misbehaves, isn't it pretty simple to IP ban the person and all accounts? And if it isn't simple, how do you know if someone hasd multiple accounts in the first place (pardon my ignorance on this issues, since I don't know how to do the multiple IP address and/or account trick). I'm still not convinced.

[GBRulz]

1.) APB/Tank did that John Holmes, MD PhD on the JSO and it was very funny.

I agree that a lot of the bits weren't that funny.


So, were they funny or not? Make up your damn mind! :wink:

[Scott Campbell]

I think I was one of the few people who didn't think there was anything wrong with multiple accounts.

Of course you didn't Mr. President.

How you liken them Cowboys now Dubya?

???

I think there were quite a few of us the figured Green Day's alter ego was the George W. Bush poster at JSO.

[Scott Campbell]

Whether you agree with it or not, the matter was put to a vote here at PR, and membership was overwhelmingly against posters using multiple accounts.

The people have spoken.

[Mazzin]

I agree the people have spoken, but for some f-ing reason, even tough we aren't allowed to have 2 accounts some how, everyone and their fucking mom tell me im tank, that shit is old!

HEY IT'S ME! MAZZIN! :evil:


Sorry about the anger! FUCK!

[GBRulz]

what is getting old is the stirring up of the drama pot all the time. You're starting to make me believe you're HH.

[jack's smirking revenge]

I agree the people have spoken, but for some f-ing reason, even tough we aren't allowed to have 2 accounts some how, everyone and their fucking mom tell me im tank, that shit is old!

HEY IT'S ME! MAZZIN! :evil:


Sorry about the anger! FUCK!

Hi Mazzin. Hope all is well with you and Tank. j/k. :D

tyler

[mraynrand]

Whether you agree with it or not, the matter was put to a vote here at PR, and membership was overwhelmingly against posters using multiple accounts.

The people have spoken.

You're right. But that doesn't change my position that I haven't heard one good argument against multiple accounts.

And I'm pretty certain that 'Greenday' and the George Bush guy were separate entities. To my knowledge, Greenday had just one account and only changed avatars and names a couple of times ('Winston Smith' and 'Gangreneday' if I recall correctly)

[mraynrand]

1.) APB/Tank did that John Holmes, MD PhD on the JSO and it was very funny. I think the idea there was not to hide, but to be funny. In that instance, it worked.

I can't believe I'm quoting myself. I think the phrase "In that instance, it worked" means that I thought the John Holmes bit was funny, but that other things were not. I didn't care much for the "Ted in the closet" poems, for example. This isn't hard to grasp, is it?

[jack's smirking revenge]

I had a really fun time posting periodically as Mike Sherman at JSO. To me, an additional account gave me the ability to have a different personality in the forum. Some would say having another personality is not necessary, but when your psyche is as fragmented and chaotic as mine, sometimes its therapeutic.

You can believe me when I say (unlike Tank evidentally) that I only have one account here. One account is enough work to keep me busy.

:D

tyler

[MadtownPacker]

You're right. But that doesn't change my position that I haven't heard one good argument against multiple accounts.

Aynrand - The overwhelming majority of PR posters thought multiple accounts are BS so who gives a shit how many "good arguements" you have heard.

Let me use AntiPolarbear aka "Tank" as the perfect example.

He was able to log on as APB, post whatever garbage he wanted, whenever, over and over. If it wasnt about football it was moved to the Romper Room but he was still able to do it, over and over. Yet that wasnt good enough, he had to make not 1 but 2 extra accounts for no other purpose but to start crap.

Can you give everyone a good arguement for that? The majority has spoken and thats how PR operates, just like the USA.

[mraynrand]

Some would say having another personality is not necessary, but when your psyche is as fragmented and chaotic as mine, sometimes its therapeutic.

I wonder if Dr. John Holmes, MD, Ph.D. would agree with this. Schizophrenia is considered a mental illness (psychosis) by the APA (American Psychiatric Association).

[mraynrand]

You're right. But that doesn't change my position that I haven't heard one good argument against multiple accounts.

Aynrand - The overwhelming majority of PR posters thought multiple accounts are BS so who gives a shit how many "good arguements" you have heard.

I do.



Let me use AntiPolarbear aka "Tank" as the perfect example.

He was able to log on as APB, post whatever garbage he wanted, whenever, over and over. If it wasnt about football it was moved to the Romper Room but he was still able to do it, over and over. Yet that wasnt good enough, he had to make not 1 but 2 extra accounts for no other purpose but to start crap.

Can you give everyone a good arguement for that? The majority has spoken and thats how PR operates, just like the USA.

You're not arguing for or against multiple accounts here, but rather, you're arguing that APB (and his other manifestations) were providing poor or questionable content. As I stated above, I have absolutely no problem with you guys setting a standard for behavior and tossing someone who violates that standard. And you're well within your rights to not allow multiple accounts as a standard. If it's far more difficult to track down someone who violates content standards when they start multiple accounts, I can see that as one argument for not allowing multiple accounts. My understanding (which may very likely be wrong) is that an IP ban would take care of someone making multiple accounts. If it's easy to set up mulitiple IPs and avoid an IP ban, I'm not sure how you'd police the multiple user thing in the first place. So we've come full circle. I think (and I'm one of the very few) that it makes no difference whether you post with different names, just so long as you follow the content behavior standards. It appears to me that you're much more upset with APB/Tank for content than you are for the multiple names. But feel free to set me straight if what I wrote is full of misconceptions.

[Mazzin]

GBrulz, sorry if i'm "Stirring" the pot. But if it bothers you that I wondered where tank was, and asked, and than told HIS side of the story, if that pissed you off, you are just sensitive.

[KYPack]

Ayn,

After what everybody has been thru on this forum, I think the "multi-ban" is to deter LJ types rather than the Baby Tanky. Tank is a pain in the ass, but he's harmless. LJ activity could well sink a forum. The ban gives Mad and the Mods the tools to police a psycho like that.

If a goof like Tank had to be publically hung to enforce the ban, all the better.

Noodle, you were MS? Good job.

Which wunna you buttheads was Spock?

That was funny for a minute.

[SkinBasket]

GBrulz, sorry if i'm "Stirring" the pot. But if it bothers you that I wondered where tank was, and asked, and than told HIS side of the story, if that pissed you off, you are just sensitive.

Maybe you didn't notice that no one appreciated you creating drama, not just GBR. The fact that you hooted and hollared like a bleeding monkey, made uneducated and idiotic accusations about Madtown, and misrepresented the situation is the problem. Then again, maybe we're all just sensitive because you're such a ironclad hardass hooch.

[Deputy Nutz]

SKINBASKET!!! Whats up you badass motherfucker of a Bear Shit!!! Haven't heard from you in a while! Just wanted to give a shout out to one of my Bitches!!!

[mraynrand]

After what everybody has been thru on this forum, I think the "multi-ban" is to deter LJ types rather than the Baby Tanky. Tank is a pain in the ass, but he's harmless. LJ activity could well sink a forum. The ban gives Mad and the Mods the tools to police a psycho like that.

Ok, but again, you're arguing content behavior. If people are nasty in their different logins, that's a different issue, isn't it? Let's say for the sake of argument that Harvey and Patler were the same guy or that GBRulz and 007 were the same lady, would you be in favor of banning them for violating the multi login rule?

[KYPack]

After what everybody has been thru on this forum, I think the "multi-ban" is to deter LJ types rather than the Baby Tanky. Tank is a pain in the ass, but he's harmless. LJ activity could well sink a forum. The ban gives Mad and the Mods the tools to police a psycho like that.

Ok, but again, you're arguing content behavior. If people are nasty in their different logins, that's a different issue, isn't it? Let's say for the sake of argument that Harvey and Patler were the same guy or that GBRulz and 007 were the same lady, would you be in favor of banning them for violating the multi login rule?

That's a nice argument, but in fact doesn't hold that much water.

The Forum is having to lose a little content to enforce a rule that can help it's survival. Savage posters intent on destroying the Forum by hiding behind the multiple ID's can create all sorts of havoc.

You were on JSO during the LJ debacle (I think), you wanna return to the dark ages?

[Bretsky]

this thread blows again; not even sure why it's being discussed.

This issue was considered in detail by everyone who wanted to give input long long ago and the rule was laid out. Naturally some will not agree; tha'ts cool. Everyone won't agree with every rule but it's the rule and should be respected by those in here.

I don't like the NFL Celebration rule either; but I still choose to watch the NFL. There could be rules in here I don't like; I still choose to post here.

Would be cool to move on now that we all agree there are diffences over a rule that isn't going to be changed and was considered in detail months ago.

[mraynrand]

This issue was considered in detail by everyone who wanted to give input long long ago and the rule was laid out. Naturally some will not agree; tha'ts cool. Everyone won't agree with every rule but it's the rule and should be respected by those in here.

I respect the rule, but there are some things I don't understand, and I'm being kind of tenacious about trying to find the answers. I know probably no one really cares, but I'm interested in seeing if anyone can convince me that there's some inherent harm in having multiple logins. I can understand people preferring to know that they're not conversing with the same person using different names, but again, if no harm is being done, what is the problem? As I pointed out, many different people in a household or workplace could potentially log on as the same guy. How could you police that? LJ was a problem because he was a nasty dude in multiple iterations. But if he had been a friendly guy, playing multiple roles, who would have cared?

Also, I hope mad answers my question about tracking down trouble makers. I don't understand how having multiple logins makes it harder to track down and IP ban someone for bad behaviour.

Let me repeat, I respect the rule and I understand it. I have no desire to set up multiple accounts. I simply don't understand how it is a threat to the forum, just so long as the person, or multiple-personality behaves him or herself. Personally, I'm interested in the answers to these questions out of simple curiosity, but hey, if you really don't care to answer them, I can understand that too.

[HarveyWallbangers]

http://packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?t=1902&start=0

[Deputy Nutz]

After what everybody has been thru on this forum, I think the "multi-ban" is to deter LJ types rather than the Baby Tanky. Tank is a pain in the ass, but he's harmless. LJ activity could well sink a forum. The ban gives Mad and the Mods the tools to police a psycho like that.

Ok, but again, you're arguing content behavior. If people are nasty in their different logins, that's a different issue, isn't it? Let's say for the sake of argument that Harvey and Patler were the same guy or that GBRulz and 007 were the same lady, would you be in favor of banning them for violating the multi login rule?


Unfortunately we would have to ban them. Everyone is aware of the fact that creating multiple accounts without a stated reason to the administrator or the mods is in danger of being banned.

It compromises the integrity of everyone on this forum when people go ahead and create multiple accounts. If you are too much of a coward to state an opinion from your trusted user account and have to go create another account to either state that opinion or back up the opinion from your trusted user account that is being a candy ass. Something that Tank did on 10 times with his "other" accounts. That is a total lack of integrity and alowing something like that to continue will in the long term wreck the integrity and respect of this forum.

I don't get all this agrument. It is a rule follow it or don't.

[mraynrand]

I don't get all this agrument. It is a rule follow it or don't.

*sigh*

Did you read my posts? Several people have made the argument that having multiple logins could ruin the forum. Most of them seem to be making the leap that anyone having multiple logins must be a trouble-maker, since that's what LJ did. I'm asking for clarifications, which I explained above. I'm not asking for the rule to be changed

[Deputy Nutz]

I don't get all this agrument. It is a rule follow it or don't.

*sigh*

Did you read my posts? Several people have made the argument that having multiple logins could ruin the forum. Most of them seem to be making the leap that anyone having multiple logins must be a trouble-maker, since that's what LJ did. I'm asking for clarifications, which I explained above. I'm not asking for the rule to be changed

I added to my post. go back and read it. if your not asking for the rule to be changed than who gives a fuck about clarification? Here is all the clarification you need, if you create multiple accounts and the admin finds out you will get banned.

[MadtownPacker]

Aynrand - Telling you how security works would defeat the purpose of having security. I hope you understand and if you dont then I cant help you.

The forum decided "no" to duplicate accounts and that is all the explaining that is gonna happen.

Like I said before, Antipolarbear was posting whatever he wanted. That is not why he was suspended.

If GBM and 007 where duplicate accounts they would be suspended too.

[Scott Campbell]

Whether you agree with it or not, the matter was put to a vote here at PR, and membership was overwhelmingly against posters using multiple accounts.

The people have spoken.

You're right. But that doesn't change my position that I haven't heard one good argument against multiple accounts.


The only good argument against multiple accounts you need to hear is that our membership voted against it. And that makes all other arguments irrelevent at this point.

I've been involved with decisions here that I didn't initially agree with too. But once the decision is made by the vote, or by Mad and the admins - I get on board and support the decision and the site because that's what is best for our community. The time to make a difference with your input/arguments is before the vote. When you complain about it afterwards, it just sounds like sour grapes. It's counter productive.

I suggest you adopt a pet cause that is more constructive. We've wasted enough time on this. It's no big deal, and certainly not worth arguing over.

IMO

[RashanGary]

Did I have duplicate accounts Mad?

My wife said she was unable to make an account. She tried.

[mraynrand]

It compromises the integrity of everyone on this forum when people go ahead and create multiple accounts. If you are too much of a coward to state an opinion from your trusted user account and have to go create another account to either state that opinion or back up the opinion from your trusted user account that is being a candy ass. Something that Tank did on 10 times with his "other" accounts. That is a total lack of integrity and alowing something like that to continue will in the long term wreck the integrity and respect of this forum.

I think this is a reasonable argument, but it still assumes that someone would be setting up multiple accounts for nefarious purposes. I don't buy the argument that this must be so, and I still maintain that if someone were using multiple names just for fun, and wasn't being nasty mean-spirited, or violating forum behaviour rules, it wouldn't necessarily compromise the 'integrity' of the forum. For example, if I wanted a login as "Cliff Cristl" (or Cleft Crusty) to give viewpoints from 'Cliff's' perspective, I think that would be much more fun than logging in as Mraynrand and saying "Cliff Cristl would say...." What would be the harm in that?

[MadtownPacker]

Did I have duplicate accounts Mad?

My wife said she was unable to make an account. She tried.If she used a bogus email is was deleted. Lucky for you cuz if she read the way you talked about women she would have kicked your ass!

[GBRulz]

GBrulz, sorry if i'm "Stirring" the pot. But if it bothers you that I wondered where tank was, and asked, and than told HIS side of the story, if that pissed you off, you are just sensitive.

No, it doesn't bother me that you asked where Tank was. It bothers me that you have to bring your issue to the whole forum instead of taking it to just the admins.

[Bretsky]

Mad,
Can you send me over some duplicate Latinas for the weekend ??

B

[Scott Campbell]

Unfortunately we would have to ban them. Everyone is aware of the fact that creating multiple accounts without a stated reason to the administrator or the mods is in danger of being banned.


And that helps explains why nobody has yet opened a Harlan Fuckleby account.

[SkinBasket]

POSITIVES OF MULIPLE ACCOUNTS
-----------------------------
Make joke posts (usually bad jokes)



NEGETIVES OF MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS
------------------------------
Tool used to fuck with forum and its users





POSITIVES OF ALLOWING PEOPLE TO SHOOT OTHER PEOPLE
---------------------------
Makes for good jokes



NEGETIVES OF ALLOWING PEOPLE TO SHOOT OTHER PEOPLE
---------------------------
Tool used to kill people


As you can see my logic is irrefutable. Multiple accounts are bad.

[MadtownPacker]

Mad,
Can you send me over some duplicate Latinas for the weekend ??

BFinally, a reasonable and well thought out request.

Of course my pale Packer brother!

But the carpet might not match the curtains! Might not even have any carpet at all! :lol:

[GBRulz]

this thread blows again; not even sure why it's being discussed.

This issue was considered in detail by everyone who wanted to give input long long ago and the rule was laid out. Naturally some will not agree; tha'ts cool. Everyone won't agree with every rule but it's the rule and should be respected by those in here.

I don't like the NFL Celebration rule either; but I still choose to watch the NFL. There could be rules in here I don't like; I still choose to post here.

Would be cool to move on now that we all agree there are diffences over a rule that isn't going to be changed and was considered in detail months ago.

I agree with B. Enough already or GJ is going to start his rant about allowing OT posts in the Packer forum! :wink:

[SkinBasket]

But the carpet might not match the curtains! Might not even have any carpet at all! :lol:

Can I get one without the curtains too?

[mraynrand]

Whether you agree with it or not, the matter was put to a vote here at PR, and membership was overwhelmingly against posters using multiple accounts.

The people have spoken.

You're right. But that doesn't change my position that I haven't heard one good argument against multiple accounts.


The only good argument against multiple accounts you need to hear is that our membership voted against it. And that makes all other arguments irrelevent at this point.

I've been involved with decisions here that I didn't initially agree with too. But once the decision is made by the vote, or by Mad and the admins - I get on board and support the decision and the site because that's what is best for our community. The time to make a difference with your input/arguments is before the vote. When you complain about it afterwards, it just sounds like sour grapes. It's counter productive.

I suggest you adopt a pet cause that is more constructive. We've wasted enough time on this. It's no big deal, and certainly not worth arguing over.

IMO

I'm not complaining about it. I just want to understand the logic, or lack thereof, behind it. Nutz gave a decent argument, but he, like others, seems to assume that a multiple login must correlate with bad behavior. I asked other specific questions, and your answers addressed none of them. If you don't want to address my specific questions, you're not obligated to respond.

I dispute your point that "The only good argument against multiple accounts you need to hear is that our membership voted against it. And that makes all other arguments irrelevent at this point." (Using this argument, no law on the books good or bad would ever be changed)

I would argue that many might enjoy multiple logins by the same person if they were clever and not mean spirited, just so long as any nasty guy using multiple logins could be easily rooted out.

[HarveyWallbangers]

I think the whole thing is it's easier to deal with somebody who would want to do harm to the forum by banning duplicate accounts than letting the cat of the bag and having to deal with the admin work that it would take to deal with them after they did the harm.

That's all I'm going to say about that.

Hell, I've raised a stink about getting something other than "Trailer Rat" and the Redneck Mexican won't listen to me, so I've moved on. That wasn't even put up to a damn vote.

[Zool]

How about

Because the guy running the ship said so

It might not be a perfect system, but its the system thats in place, and its about 6000% better than the alternative.

[SkinBasket]

Goddamnit mraynrand! Stop trolling this subject. If anything you should be explaining to us why multiple accounts are a good thing, beyond making lame joke posts, not others explaining to you why they are a bad thing, beyond that no one wants them, no one likes them, and they CAN be used to fuck with the forum, which is more than enough reason.

The burden is on you my friend and just because you dismiss every reason thats been presented doesn't mean they don't exist.

Now come give me a hug and I'll slap your ass.

[GBRulz]

You can have my name, Harv. I won't complain!

[Scott Campbell]

Then lets put it this way. You could be more constructive and supportive if you lobbied Mad and/or the mods in PM to re-open the issue to another vote.

Maybe you don't intend to be complaining. But it sure sounds like complaining from my end.

[SkinBasket]

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go braid my testicle hair to match the viking helmet I bought for my penis.

[Zool]

I hear corn rows look lovely this time of year

[Scott Campbell]

Hell, I've raised a stink about getting something other than "Trailer Rat" and the Redneck Mexican won't listen to me, so I've moved on. That wasn't even put up to a damn vote.


No THAT is how to complain.

What would you choose for a tag line if he let you pick?

[HarveyWallbangers]

Hedgehog Rat?

[mraynrand]

Then lets put it this way. You could be more constructive and supportive if you lobbied Mad and/or the mods in PM to re-open the issue to another vote.

I don't want this. I don't think this part of it is a big deal. I want to know

1) Is it harder to ban someone who has multiple accounts than someone with one account?
2) Who is actually bothered by someone with multiple accounts, if they are friendly and/or clever? If you are bothered by this, are you bothered by the fact that multiple people could be commenting using the same login?
3) Why do you assume that people with multiple logins will be nasty? I think I could be pretty naive here - maybe most if not all of multiple login people are nasty (except Smirking Revenge)

Finally, I'm not interested in changing the rule, I was just curious about the above stuff and about arguing things I see as being logical inconsistencies. Maybe the Packers just look so lousy that I'm not all that interested in arguing whether one pile of crap (Boerigter) is better than another pile of crap (Gardner).

[mraynrand]

Goddamnit mraynrand! Stop trolling this subject. If anything you should be explaining to us why multiple accounts are a good thing, beyond making lame joke posts, not others explaining to you why they are a bad thing, beyond that no one wants them, no one likes them, and they CAN be used to fuck with the forum, which is more than enough reason.

The burden is on you my friend and just because you dismiss every reason thats been presented doesn't mean they don't exist.

Now come give me a hug and I'll slap your ass.

LOL. OK, I'll let it go. I did give one example. If I knew how to make multiple logins, and it wasn't banned, I would have made a "Cliff Cristl" login to give my crusty opinions in the guise of 'ole cliffy. Also, I liked that John Holmes thread on the JSO, and probably it wouldn't have been as much fun had I known it was tank. But I'm probably giving tank too much credit for that, considering all the other lame threads he's come up with (Ted in the closet chapters 1-12 come to mind).

[pacfan]

i'll play along on the dreary slow friday afternoon (in southern wisconsin).

maynard,

I understand your logic as to why you want question the rationale behind the decision and your fustration with the "its the rules just deal with it" response".

I look at it this way. The on-line persona that you create when you join packerrats constitutes a singular identity, unique unto you. This makes that one person directly accountable for things that they would write, to the admins and to all of us as a community.

With multiple logins somebody can circumvent that idea by becoming somebody else. No accountability and no control for the admin (which has been proven we need).

At JSO, where multiple ID's were possible, this was used to create the worst scenario (for me). Somebody was able to post private real-life informatrion about another poster on the web. This breach of ettiqutte is just wrong.

There were people hi-jacking other logins/ID's and talking insane trash. In this space i'm "pacfan", and I'm confident I can embarrass myself with my own spelling errors and foolish ideas all by myself. This ID theft happened to a number of people here (at JSO) and it became confusing who was saying what about who and we lurkers have to know who saying what in order to track the conversation.

I think the rules are just fine. one-for-one ensures that harv is harv, that partial is partial, and that ballhawk is the 13 year old kid with cool sense of humor.

I don't see a need for multiple accounts, if you want to show different sides of your personality in this place, then go ahead. Just use your own ID.

[test]

I hear corn rows look lovely this time of year

You'll never pull it off.

[SkinBasket]

I hear corn rows look lovely this time of year

You'll never pull it off.

You mean my pubes or the look?

[test]

I hear corn rows look lovely this time of year

You'll never pull it off.

You mean my pubes or the look?

the wax off your ass.

[SkinBasket]

There's wax on my ass? I told you to use the pig lard, not the wax. I understand, it was dark and you were nervous because it was your first time. Don't worry, I'll just get some astroglide for next time.

[BallHawk]

Thanks for the kind words, JAPF and pacfan.

[test]

There's wax on my ass? I told you to use the pig lard, not the wax. I understand, it was dark and you were nervous because it was your first time. Don't worry, I'll just get some astroglide for next time.

damn I'm good. nailed ya from 900 miles away.

[Mazzin]

The reason I brought it all out to the WHOLE FORUM is because mad wouldn't give me a real answer, and seemed fishy! Now he is saying that I'm banned for posting his private message, but for some reason i can still post, he is scared of an 18 year old girl so he will boot me, thats real mature, that overweight peice of shit.

Bye bitches

[Mazzin]

I really do like all of you guys even skinbasket, and still like mad, when he isn't on a fucking powertrip! But thanks for good times, ill be at Packerchatters.com or JSO. see you around

[BallHawk]

bye :roll:

[SkinBasket]

There's wax on my ass? I told you to use the pig lard, not the wax. I understand, it was dark and you were nervous because it was your first time. Don't worry, I'll just get some astroglide for next time.

damn I'm good. nailed ya from 900 miles away.

Actually you're more lame than usual. Congratulations. It's kind of like a promotion for you.

[SkinBasket]

The reason I brought it all out to the WHOLE FORUM is because mad wouldn't give me a real answer, and seemed fishy! Now he is saying that I'm banned for posting his private message, but for some reason i can still post, he is scared of an 18 year old girl so he will boot me, thats real mature, that overweight peice of shit.

Bye bitches

Mazzin, maybe he wouldn't give you a real answer because it was none of your business. And posting PMs kind of defeats the purpose of Private Messeges. Especially when you use the text of the messege to make accusations and generally shit all over some one. I can guarantee you he isn't scared of you. He may be tired of your crap, but he ain't scared - especially of having juvenile insults hurled at him.

If you leave, I hope you're smart enough to stay on the pill without Ziggy to goad you.

[the_idle_threat]

A quick $.02 re: multiple IDs ...

Many folks have the opinion this forum is a more friendly place than others on the web ... a place where debate is spirited and yet respectful ... a place where members make plans to meet each other in person as friends ... hell, we even have the friendliest and most respectful "troll" I've ever met, one who has been a part of said meetings despite being a fan of the Dread Purple.

It's my opinion that the ban on multiple IDs is directly responsible for this positive environment ... perhaps even more so than the fact that lurkers must register in order to read content. You get ONE identity here, and everything you say is attributable to that single identity. If you want to be repected and welcomed in this friendly place, you will be compelled to conduct yourself in a socially acceptable manner.

With multiple IDs, this social reinforcement is lost. You could hide behind different identities in order to post something nasty one minute and friendly the next ... and if you regret being nasty, no harm if you stop using that "nasty" ID. Just create another one the next time something nasty comes to mind.

Under the current setup, nasty posts have social consequences. The result is an almost total lack of the behavior the Internet is famous for---statements made in print that a person would never say to another's face. I think it's wise to keep it that way.

Regarding the argument that multiple IDs could be used for good rather than evil ... it's a trade off I think most of us are willing to make. We value the atmosphere here enough that we will preclude the occasional comic alter-ego in order to preserve it. FWIW, mraynrand, I thought your "Cleft Crusty" column was well-received and very funny even when posted under your own ID.

IMHO

[FavreChild]

I'm sure Mad would give permission for a second account to create a "Cleft Crusty" persona or the like, if the intended purpose was made clear to him and the persona would make a healthy new contribution to the forum.

[justanotherpackfan]

Mazzin is gone.(cries softly) :sad:

[the_idle_threat]

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Don't fret, little guy ... I doubt she's really gone for good.

[MadtownPacker]

Great post Idle!



I'm sure Mad would give permission for a second account to create a "Cleft Crusty" persona or the like, if the intended purpose was made clear to him and the persona would make a healthy new contribution to the forum.
PR is actually in the process of trying to sign Cleft Crusty to a lucrative contract to do a Q&A sesssion on the PR homepage for the 2006 season. The bastard aint coming cheap though.

[the_idle_threat]

Thanks, boss.

Give ol' Crusty what he's asking for ... he's worth a whole box of Ding-Dongs.

[justanotherpackfan]

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Don't fret, little guy ... I doubt she's really gone for good.
Good, she is hot. :lol:

[Partial]

Whether you agree with it or not, the matter was put to a vote here at PR, and membership was overwhelmingly against posters using multiple accounts.

The people have spoken.

You're right. But that doesn't change my position that I haven't heard one good argument against multiple accounts.


The only good argument against multiple accounts you need to hear is that our membership voted against it. And that makes all other arguments irrelevent at this point.

I've been involved with decisions here that I didn't initially agree with too. But once the decision is made by the vote, or by Mad and the admins - I get on board and support the decision and the site because that's what is best for our community. The time to make a difference with your input/arguments is before the vote. When you complain about it afterwards, it just sounds like sour grapes. It's counter productive.

I suggest you adopt a pet cause that is more constructive. We've wasted enough time on this. It's no big deal, and certainly not worth arguing over.

IMO

you're a smart man, scott

[BallHawk]

Good, she is hot. :lol:

She'd be better without braces. Not bad, though. One thing that annoys me about her is she craves for attention. She'll say she'll leave, than she'll come back, than she'll start a thread about her pregnacy issues, than she'll post private messages.

For Fuck's sakes people it's PackerRats, not Days of Our Lives.

[Partial]

Unfortunately we would have to ban them. Everyone is aware of the fact that creating multiple accounts without a stated reason to the administrator or the mods is in danger of being banned.


And that helps explains why nobody has yet opened a Harlan Fuckleby account.

Registering as we speak :mrgreen: (j/k)

[Partial]

Mad,
Can you send me over some duplicate Latinas for the weekend ??

BFinally, a reasonable and well thought out request.

Of course my pale Packer brother!

But the carpet might not match the curtains! Might not even have any carpet at all! :lol:

Nobody likes carpet anyways!!!

[Partial]

I think the whole thing is it's easier to deal with somebody who would want to do harm to the forum by banning duplicate accounts than letting the cat of the bag and having to deal with the admin work that it would take to deal with them after they did the harm.

That's all I'm going to say about that.

Hell, I've raised a stink about getting something other than "Trailer Rat" and the Redneck Mexican won't listen to me, so I've moved on. That wasn't even put up to a damn vote.

I don't get the joke behind it myself, but I think it's funny mad won't change it :mrgreen:

[Partial]

How about

Because the guy running the ship said so

It might not be a perfect system, but its the system thats in place, and its about 6000% better than the alternative.

preach on bro

[Partial]

A quick $.02 re: multiple IDs ...

Many folks have the opinion this forum is a more friendly place than others on the web ... a place where debate is spirited and yet respectful ... a place where members make plans to meet each other in person as friends ... hell, we even have the friendliest and most respectful "troll" I've ever met, one who has been a part of said meetings despite being a fan of the Dread Purple.

It's my opinion that the ban on multiple IDs is directly responsible for this positive environment ... perhaps even more so than the fact that lurkers must register in order to read content. You get ONE identity here, and everything you say is attributable to that single identity. If you want to be repected and welcomed in this friendly place, you will be compelled to conduct yourself in a socially acceptable manner.

With multiple IDs, this social reinforcement is lost. You could hide behind different identities in order to post something nasty one minute and friendly the next ... and if you regret being nasty, no harm if you stop using that "nasty" ID. Just create another one the next time something nasty comes to mind.

Under the current setup, nasty posts have social consequences. The result is an almost total lack of the behavior the Internet is famous for---statements made in print that a person would never say to another's face. I think it's wise to keep it that way.

Regarding the argument that multiple IDs could be used for good rather than evil ... it's a trade off I think most of us are willing to make. We value the atmosphere here enough that we will preclude the occasional comic alter-ego in order to preserve it. FWIW, mraynrand, I thought your "Cleft Crusty" column was well-received and very funny even when posted under your own ID.

IMHO

hit the nail right on the head

[justanotherpackfan]

Good, she is hot. :lol:

She'd be better without braces. Not bad, though. One thing that annoys me about her is she craves for attention. She'll say she'll leave, than she'll come back, than she'll start a thread about her pregnacy issues, than she'll post private messages.

For Fuck's sakes people it's PackerRats, not Days of Our Lives.
I know but the key is....she's hot.

[mraynrand]

A quick $.02 re: multiple IDs ......

Best argument I've seen yet. Thanks for taking the time. I really appreciate it (I mean that).

[the_idle_threat]

Happy to help .... I could see where you were coming from on this, as "rules are rules" has never cut it for me either.

[justanotherpackfan]

Good, she is hot. :lol:

She'd be better without braces. Not bad, though. One thing that annoys me about her is she craves for attention. She'll say she'll leave, than she'll come back, than she'll start a thread about her pregnacy issues, than she'll post private messages.

For Fuck's sakes people it's PackerRats, not Days of Our Lives.
Braces are alright, they straighten your teeth up nicely. How can you even tell? I had braces and my teeth are now perfect.

[Mazzin]

Well you can bet your ass I'm not leaving till I get the boot. Sure I crave the attention, I mean sometimes this place is slow, so why not stir some shit. Sue me.

[Partial]

Well you can bet your ass I'm not leaving till I get the boot. Sure I crave the attention, I mean sometimes this place is slow, so why not stir some shit. Sue me.

Based on the fact I read every new thread and skim every post, I would say that its definitely busier than ever. There's no need to stir shit up and make excuses.

[the_idle_threat]

Oh hell, why not let Mazzin have her fun? You have to admit her threads get a lot of responses and keep this place hoppin'.

[Partial]

Oh hell, why not let Mazzin have her fun? You have to admit her threads get a lot of responses and keep this place hoppin'.




ouch man, ouch

[justanotherpackfan]

Oh hell, why not let Mazzin have her fun? You have to admit her threads get a lot of responses and keep this place hoppin'.



Yeah, Mazzin is cool. Partial you are cool too, because you lift weights.

[Partial]

Oh hell, why not let Mazzin have her fun? You have to admit her threads get a lot of responses and keep this place hoppin'.



Yeah, Mazzin is cool. Partial you are cool too, because you lift weights.

Working out just takes me from Greg Norman to Tiger Woods. Either way, I am pretty damn cool and rich.

[test]

Oh hell, why not let Mazzin have her fun? You have to admit her threads get a lot of responses and keep this place hoppin'.




I'm jealous. I guess I'll have to the picture of me in my thong.

[Mazzin]

haha thanks idle!

[BallHawk]

How can you even tell?

She posted several pictures a while back and you could see them then. I can't remember what thread it was in. It might of been the Pregnency Pandemonium thread, but I'm not sure.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Hi gang!

A little brown bird told me to check this thread. I don't see anything scandalous or exciting.

Thanks for the love (and especially thanks for the shout-out, Scott Campbell!)

Well, just a personal update: I've moved to Thailand and found a teaching job at a girl's elementary school.

I will post in this forum again someday. Am lurking a little bit - and I don't just mean around the school yard.

[the_idle_threat]

Sounds like a cover story for rehab ... :razz:

We'll look forward to your triumphant return when the whole nose candy thing gets worked out ...

I hope all is well, Harlan!

[FavreChild]

HH, you told me you'd never leave me!

Another damn lying man, that's what you are.

[Joemailman]

Men don't lie. We just adjust our thinking. :razz:

[Bretsky]

HH, you told me you'd never leave me!

Another damn lying man, that's what you are.


You can only trust a good man if you work in two's :))))))) :evil:

[Scott Campbell]

Nutz, I am not taking a break, I am going to not post here anymore. And the real reason is I am changing priorities in my life. This forum is too addictive for me to dabble in.

I am not mad at Madtown or anybody else. Mad treated me crappy because he is kind of an idiot. So what. We'll be friends again and chat occasionally in IM, despite his macho statements to contrary now.

I am lurking in here because I don't want to leave with bad feelings, so many great memories of characters here. Your statement about me wanting to sour the forum, uhh, sorry you have this impression. I am rebellious, and speak-up to authority. And there's the pitch black sense of humor.

Anyway, anybody can email me at RBurger@SequelSolutions.biz, my name is Dick Burger, "Harlan Huckleby" is now retired. I am staying away from the forum because it is best for me to go cold turkey, not because the forum isn't a blast.



I'm reminded of the 7 year old who runs away from home vowing never to return - showing up a half hour later because it's raining outside and he forgot his toothbrush.

Welcome back Huck!

[Guiness]

Hi gang!

A little brown bird told me to check this thread. I don't see anything scandalous or exciting.

Thanks for the love (and especially thanks for the shout-out, Scott Campbell!)

Well, just a personal update: I've moved to Thailand and found a teaching job at a girl's elementary school.

I will post in this forum again someday. Am lurking a little bit - and I don't just mean around the school yard.

So you're the one that got the job over me - they said there was another pot bellied, middle aged, balding guy with better credentials...

[Guiness]

Good, she is hot. :lol:

She'd be better without braces. Not bad, though. One thing that annoys me about her is she craves for attention. She'll say she'll leave, than she'll come back, than she'll start a thread about her pregnacy issues, than she'll post private messages.

For Fuck's sakes people it's PackerRats, not Days of Our Lives.

Err - a teenage girl who's willing to talk to us, and you're looking for a sane one too?

Not asking for too much, are ya? :roll:

[KYPack]

Hi gang!

A little brown bird told me to check this thread. .

That would be the Turd bird.

Ah, HH

You come sniveling back to us!

I thought that was you I saw down by the schoolyard playground, hiding behind the teetertotters.

It's good to see you again, sorta.

[Bubba "hotdog&quot]

Haven't seen him in a while; my guess is he's girl whipped with the chick at work.

either that, or we all finally pissed him off... Maybe his dad cut him off and he had to decide between internet access or pot?

I'm glad he made the right choice.

Im new here but thats funny!! Glad Im not havin to make that choice!!

[retailguy]

Haven't seen him in a while; my guess is he's girl whipped with the chick at work.

either that, or we all finally pissed him off... Maybe his dad cut him off and he had to decide between internet access or pot?

I'm glad he made the right choice.

Im new here but thats funny!! Glad Im not havin to make that choice!!

Welcome to the forum. It is good to have you here....

[woodbuck27]

Hi gang!

A little brown bird told me to check this thread. I don't see anything scandalous or exciting.

Thanks for the love (and especially thanks for the shout-out, Scott Campbell!)

Well, just a personal update: I've moved to Thailand and found a teaching job at a girl's elementary school.

I will post in this forum again someday. Am lurking a little bit - and I don't just mean around the school yard.

Harlan. Jaysus smarten up, and try to get in here a little more. :mrgreen: