View Full Version : Packers 5th overall defense in yards per game
RashanGary
09-17-2012, 10:34 PM
Not as bad as we're making it out to be?
Joemailman
09-17-2012, 10:42 PM
A little early to tell how good they will be. All of the rookies contributing gives hope for improvement. However, they're only 25th against the run, and they will have to improve on that if they want to be a top defense.
Brandon494
09-17-2012, 10:47 PM
Dude we've played two games.
mission
09-17-2012, 11:23 PM
OMG TOP 5 DEFENSE!!! 9 OFFENSIVE DRAFT PICKS NEXT YEAR FIRE MM
mission
09-17-2012, 11:24 PM
(As I've said before, I *do* think this defense is going to turn out to be outstanding by the end of the year)
MadScientist
09-18-2012, 12:31 AM
They didn't look good in the first game, but were outstanding in the second. Seattle will be an interesting test - good running and a limited but efficient passing attack.
Fritz
09-18-2012, 07:35 AM
It will be a good test for the line. Can they eat enough blocks and hold enough ground to free up the linebackers to make tackles for little gain?
denverYooper
09-18-2012, 09:01 AM
It will be a good test for the line. Can they eat enough blocks and hold enough ground to free up the linebackers to make tackles for little gain?
I have a 7 month old. He tries to eat blocks all the time.
mmmdk
09-18-2012, 09:59 AM
I have a 7 month old. He tries to eat blocks all the time.
:lol:
denverYooper
09-18-2012, 10:05 AM
Green Bay is currently 2nd in pass defense yardage, with 132.5. They are giving up more rushing yards than passing yards.
They are 3rd in passer rating against, at 64.7.
denverYooper
09-18-2012, 10:07 AM
So it looks like they've fixed the defense, but as brought up in the Finley thread drift, their offense is now broken. 23 ppg is just not cutting it.
denverYooper
09-18-2012, 10:11 AM
Based on our 1 game experiments against totally different offenses, It sure does seem like having a competent-looking safety who can tackle (McMillan) helps.
mmmdk
09-18-2012, 10:17 AM
I don't think we've seen the last lineup shakeup on defense; it's that kind of defense - UP & DOWN from week to week with no extra gear for the playoffs.
denverYooper
09-18-2012, 10:22 AM
I don't think we've seen the last lineup shakeup on defense; it's that kind of defense - UP & DOWN from week to week with no extra gear for the playoffs.
I agree to an extent. It's just fun extrapolating from small samples. When the experiments cost so much, ya gotta do what ya gotta do. If only they could turn science experiments into such a public spectacle. Maybe they should have sent 2 rovers to Mars and made them battle for samples, then charged $150 a pop to watch it in large auditoriums where you could buy overpriced food and crappy domestic beer. They could have funded several iterations.
rbaloha1
09-18-2012, 10:22 AM
Meaningless.
Packers 1-1.
mmmdk
09-18-2012, 11:07 AM
I agree to an extent. It's just fun extrapolating from small samples. When the experiments cost so much, ya gotta do what ya gotta do. If only they could turn science experiments into such a public spectacle. Maybe they should have sent 2 rovers to Mars and made them battle for samples, then charged $150 a pop to watch it in large auditoriums where you could buy overpriced food and crappy domestic beer. They could have funded several iterations.
Hey! Science is fun yet probably only to the curious mind. 2 rovers on Mars would be like cheese & ham! :smile:
Cheesehead Craig
09-18-2012, 02:31 PM
I have a 7 month old. He tries to eat blocks all the time.
Duly repped
RashanGary
09-18-2012, 05:23 PM
I don't think we've seen the last lineup shakeup on defense; it's that kind of defense - UP & DOWN from week to week with no extra gear for the playoffs.
Agree. House and Hayward, in particular, have a chance to make their way over some of the guys playing now.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.