PDA

View Full Version : TT's 2nd Round Steals: Casey Hayward Edition



denverYooper
10-25-2012, 09:57 PM
This from PFF today:

Snapshot: Cornerback Rating (https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/10/25/snapshot-nfl-passer-rating-allowed-cornerbacks/)

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-w36vJiyN0Qw/UIn3Y_UgZjI/AAAAAAAAAO0/uzkWZCmRU9Y/s596/Week6_CBs_NFL.jpg

Casey Hayward is tops on their list of corners based on a 140 snap cutoff. Now, I don't think he'll be singled up on Megatron but he sure looks the part of another solid second round selection by Ted.

pbmax
10-25-2012, 10:21 PM
Justin!

Time to change your PackerRats handle.

I wonder if the correlation between being a Packer 2nd Round* pick and success is strong enough to earn a larger signing bonus?

* Daryn Colledge not included

denverYooper
10-25-2012, 10:45 PM
Huber at Packer Report posted this at some point earlier today:

Thompson's 2nd round selections (http://pfref.com/tiny/Jjoef)

(Side note: PFR's query tools keep getting better. I didn't actually re-post his link but just went through their draft tools to build the same query)

denverYooper
10-25-2012, 10:46 PM
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-dDhzgvkritE/UIoHFCr-WWI/AAAAAAAAAPE/MWnj3iRuIYc/s380/TT_GNB_2nd_rounders.jpg

denverYooper
10-25-2012, 10:48 PM
The Jerel Worthy version of this series is a year or two off.

Fritz
10-26-2012, 05:27 AM
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-dDhzgvkritE/UIoHFCr-WWI/AAAAAAAAAPE/MWnj3iRuIYc/s380/TT_GNB_2nd_rounders.jpg

Okay, outside of Colledge, Brohm, and Lee this is impressive. I think the jury's still out on Neal, and Murphy was looking awfully good until he was hurt.

If I remember correctly that Raji was the ninth overall, Jamaal Reynolds was tenth, and Harrell the sixteenth, then maybe Ted should trade down if he gets a first round pick between numbers ten and sixteen?

hoosier
10-26-2012, 07:41 AM
Murphy, Collins, Jackson, Lee, Brohm, Jennings, Neal....TT's second round picks are either busts or injury prone :-)

Guiness
10-26-2012, 08:51 AM
Murphy, Collins, Jackson, Lee, Brohm, Jennings, Neal....TT's second round picks are either busts or injury prone :-)

More seriously though, that's a pretty impressive list.

I'd give him no score on Worthy (not enough information), Murphy and Neale. I'm almost tempted to give him a positive score on Murphy, because it certainly looked like he was going to be a success, but ultimately it didn't work out. Neale hasn't done much yet, but there's still the potential.

He gets an obvious positive mark for Collins, Jennings, Nelson, Cobb and Hayward. Hayward's early production gets him into that category, and Antuawn Edwards was a LONG time ago. Also positive for Jackson and Colledge who, despite not having great success with the Packers are still players in the NFL.

Negative marks for Lee and Brohm. Brohm was just a bad pick, I think he panicked a little seeing a guy who a year earlier would've easily went top 10, sitting there at the end of the 2nd. It was an obvious value pick, and he got stung.

edit: just looked up a couple of guys to see where they are. Shocked to see that Lee has started five games for the Raiders this year, and Jackson has seen limited duty in Cleveland - 2 catches for 20 yards. Wiki tells me Jackson got IR'd. And maybe Lee will be a player yet.

sharpe1027
10-26-2012, 09:08 AM
Okay, outside of Colledge, Brohm, and Lee this is impressive. I think the jury's still out on Neal, and Murphy was looking awfully good until he was hurt.

If I remember correctly that Raji was the ninth overall, Jamaal Reynolds was tenth, and Harrell the sixteenth, then maybe Ted should trade down if he gets a first round pick between numbers ten and sixteen?

I wouldn't lump Colledge with Brohm and Lee. He was a decent pick even if he eventually got beat out as a starter.

sharpe1027
10-26-2012, 09:09 AM
And maybe Lee will be a player yet.

The Raiders team is where players go to die. ;)

Patler
10-26-2012, 09:18 AM
Murphy is neither a hit nor a miss. He did not play enough for a definitive judgement.
Brohm, Lee - both picks he would like to have over, I suspect.
Colledge and Jackson - a starter and a contributor, so successful picks, but you hope for a little better than that in the 2nd.
Collins, Jennings, Nelson and Cobb - excellent picks.
Hayward - Looks like another good one, but sometimes opponents need to see a guy a few times before knowing how to take advantage of him. DBs sometimes "flash".
Worthy and Neal - no judgement yet.

I've said it before and will again, for some reason TT seems to have a knack for finding good WRs. Jennings, Jones, Nelson and Cobb all were good picks. Probably Murphy, too. The worst pick was Cory Rodgers, but he was a 4th rounder and drafted more as a return man than a receiver, but clearly an unsuccessful pick. The next worst was probably Bragg, a late 6th rounder who never did anything, but it is hit and miss then anyway. Clowney and Swain made their livings as NFL players for a few years each, which isn't bad for late round picks.

Patler
10-26-2012, 09:20 AM
I wouldn't lump Colledge with Brohm and Lee. He was a decent pick even if he eventually got beat out as a starter.

I agree, and put Colledge in the same category as Jackson. Both are contributors but you hope for a little better than that in the 2nd round. Not bad picks, but not ones to be overly proud of, either.

hoosier
10-26-2012, 10:54 AM
I wonder how much of TT's success, especially in round 2, should be attributed to scouting and evaluation, and how much to player development. There are some cases where the evaluation was clearly just wrong (Brohm) and others where you wonder if a player picked by GB would have progressed comparably had he gone elsewhere (Rodgers). You don't see too many players get drafted by GB, get cut and then go on to develop into good players someplace else. So based on that little bit of anecdotal evidence I'm guessing it's probably 70% evaluation and 30% development.

sharpe1027
10-26-2012, 12:12 PM
Once a player is cut they already have a strike against them. You would not expect very many of those cut players to develop into much -- they were cut for a reason. I don't think it is a very good measuring stick to use.

Maybe you could get an answer by looking at development as the coaching changes. If players continually develop despite coaching changes, then you could lower the import of development. If you see a significant difference in development, then you could attribute less to evaluation. I am not sure if there's been enough turnover to do a good analysis under that theory though.

Guiness
10-26-2012, 02:31 PM
I wonder how much of TT's success, especially in round 2, should be attributed to scouting and evaluation, and how much to player development. There are some cases where the evaluation was clearly just wrong (Brohm) and others where you wonder if a player picked by GB would have progressed comparably had he gone elsewhere (Rodgers). You don't see too many players get drafted by GB, get cut and then go on to develop into good players someplace else. So based on that little bit of anecdotal evidence I'm guessing it's probably 70% evaluation and 30% development.

As I said above, the Brohm choice smacks a little of panic. There was no way he could expect him to be left on the board at that time, and it's possible he didn't have a full breakdown, so more of a lack of evaluation than a wrong one.

TTwas at the bottom end of the 2nd, looking at a guy who was once ranked as a high first and doesn't have character issues. It's not hard to see why he took him.

Smidgeon
10-26-2012, 05:40 PM
As I said above, the Brohm choice smacks a little of panic. There was no way he could expect him to be left on the board at that time, and it's possible he didn't have a full breakdown, so more of a lack of evaluation than a wrong one.

TTwas at the bottom end of the 2nd, looking at a guy who was once ranked as a high first and doesn't have character issues. It's not hard to see why he took him.

If I remember correctly, Brohm was supposed to be the most NFL-ready QB that year. As value in the second round and without a backup QB to Rodgers, it made perfect sense. Brohm just ended up being awful. Or had an awfully good PR firm.

Guiness
10-26-2012, 05:47 PM
If I remember correctly, Brohm was supposed to be the most NFL-ready QB that year. As value in the second round and without a backup QB to Rodgers, it made perfect sense. Brohm just ended up being awful. Or had an awfully good PR firm.

I don't think I ever heard what really happened with him. The previous year, he was the top, or at least among the top rated QB's. Remember, that was the Jamarcus and Brady Quinn year. He returned for his senior season, and I don't know what happened to make his status fall off, but I know it was pretty much accepted that he had slipped...a lot.

mission
10-26-2012, 06:49 PM
I don't think I ever heard what really happened with him. The previous year, he was the top, or at least among the top rated QB's. Remember, that was the Jamarcus and Brady Quinn year. He returned for his senior season, and I don't know what happened to make his status fall off, but I know it was pretty much accepted that he had slipped...a lot.

I think Bobby Petrino left Louisville for the Falcons and the offense went with him. Turns out, apparently, that Brohm was just a system QB playing against weak competition. Pretty easy to hit guys that are 10 yards open even with a noodle arm.

Pugger
10-27-2012, 09:24 AM
If I remember correctly, Brohm was supposed to be the most NFL-ready QB that year. As value in the second round and without a backup QB to Rodgers, it made perfect sense. Brohm just ended up being awful. Or had an awfully good PR firm.

Which goes to show how much of a crap shoot it is picking QBs! There is a thread on footballsfuture.com where they listed the worst QB draft classes and it is remarkable how many teams picked truly dreadful QBs high and the list of crappy QBs was extensive to be sure. I remember the talking heads on BSPN and the NFLN when we picked Brohm singing he was gonna push Rodgers for the starting job and all that nonsense.

Guiness
10-27-2012, 01:03 PM
Which goes to show how much of a crap shoot it is picking QBs! There is a thread on footballsfuture.com where they listed the worst QB draft classes and it is remarkable how many teams picked truly dreadful QBs high and the list of crappy QBs was extensive to be sure. I remember the talking heads on BSPN and the NFLN when we picked Brohm singing he was gonna push Rodgers for the starting job and all that nonsense.

I remember the lines about him pushing Rodgers too. Instead, he's with the Las Vegas Locomotives, pushing some guy called Chase Clement.

Packers4Glory
10-27-2012, 02:24 PM
Brohm was looked at as a potential #1 overall pick headed into his final season in college.

Guiness
10-27-2012, 02:25 PM
Brohm was looked at as a potential #1 overall pick headed into his final season in college.

If he'd come out the year before and had gone #1, do you think he'd of had more success than Jamarcus Russel? Quite possibly...

Packers4Glory
10-27-2012, 02:31 PM
If he'd come out the year before and had gone #1, do you think he'd of had more success than Jamarcus Russel? Quite possibly...

Probably because Brohm probably actually gave a shit. Ultimately he'd have prolly failed as well because Oakland still had no direction or talent. The coaching there was absolutely horrid. So it wasn't exactly a place a rookie QB could go and grow into anything.

rbaloha1
10-27-2012, 04:20 PM
Thought BB would be a good qb. In fact, MM expected BB to compete for a starting job.

IMO his brother was the major reason for college success.

Lurker64
10-27-2012, 07:19 PM
Brohm was looked at as a potential #1 overall pick headed into his final season in college.

Then again, so was Jevan Snead.

If your response is "who?" that is the correct response.

Guiness
10-27-2012, 08:09 PM
Then again, so was Jevan Snead.

If your response is "who?" that is the correct response.

Well, if you thought he would be, it was two people, you and Pete Prisco!