Graham Harrell to be released!

[Pugger]

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/371359702510477312

[pbmax]

Pugs, its in the Roster Cutdown to 75 thread. We were trying to save computer bits.

[Joemailman]

Pugs, its in the Roster Cutdown to 75 thread. We were trying to save computer bits.

Since I called it last night and you didn't, I think this deserves its own thread. :razz:

[Pugger]

Sorry guys. :oops:

[Joemailman]

May we assume that TT is done bringing in players named Harrell?

[packer4life]

May we assume that TT is done bringing in players named Harrell?

Ha!

[MJZiggy]

I can say I'm not shocked.

[Patler]

Very clear that they won't waste a third roster spot on a QB. Can't imagine anyone will have much interest in BJ Coleman, so he should make it to the PS easily (assuming he wants to or has no other PS offers.) Also, Harrell should be available to be re-signed if the need arises.

[Pugger]

I pray we don't ever need to pick up the phone and call Graham Harrell! :shock:

[gbgary]

I can say I'm not shocked.

I can't say i'm shocked.

[Patler]

Sure is clear why MM got Harrell into the game so early. Watched him play with the Packers 1's and against Seattle's #1 defense. The best demonstration of whether or not they could perform with Harrell if Rodgers goes down.

[pbmax]

This is an unusual mea culpa from Wilde. I think it covers the Graham Harrell experience nicely. Also why you never trust what a coach says publicly.

http://espnwisconsin.com/common/page.php?feed=2&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&id=9021&is_corp=1


Rather, this is an admission of guilt column; a should’ve known better column. Because in retrospect, the only surprise about the release of Graham Harrell should have been that the Green Bay Packers didn’t cut their backup quarterback before Saturday.

And it all comes down to one simple fact: When it came to Harrell, there were always more explanations for the lack of shining moments than there were shining moments themselves. And I was as guilty as anyone.